<<  >> (p.41)
    Author Topic: EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.6  (Read 85969 times)

    • hell_slayer
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 139


    View Profile WWW
    September 24, 2018, 11:30:26 AM
    Last edit: September 24, 2018, 11:43:40 AM by hell_slayer
     #801
    Quote from: fistsofgod on September 23, 2018, 06:36:40 PM
    anyone know how to downgrade B250 mining expert bios? ez flash 3 wont let me flash an older bios version
    I think you can downgrade your bios by using afuefix64 EFI shell . I won't give you any links here , but you can use google search how to flash bios using afuefix64 . I used it for downgrade 2 times and it worked fine for me.
    1) Put afuefix shell on your flash drive together with desired bios version . 2) boot from your flash drive and skip further EFI loading 3)type : fs6: (this can be different for you , to know your number you need to look what number will have Removable HardDisk in the list) 4)type : cd EFI 5) type : cd BOOT 6)type : ls
    Now you'l see a directory where afuefix64 shell and desired bios should be allocated . 7) type : Afuefix64 "name of your bios"BPNKXCLRCFG , wait until flashing is finished and enjoy your new "old" bios  Cool

  • EWBF_ (OP)
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 198
    Merit: 160


    View Profile
    September 24, 2018, 12:06:53 PM
     #802
    Quote from: Andrey09 on September 23, 2018, 07:19:02 PM
    Hello EWBF, i have problem with one rig from 20 on your program.

    He started and after 20-30 sec go to restart. I reinstall drivers, make clean install, tried without overcloking and always same issue. Any idea how to fix my problem?  (Super stable + overclock on usual equihash on ZCL for example, or previous algo BTG) windows version.
    I mine ANON coin here anon.2miners.com  144.5 algo

    Rig with 8xGPU:

    4 x 1080
    1x 1070
    3x 1060 3Gb

    EDIT:

    I turned off one by one gpu from devices, problem with one of my 1080 GPU....other 3 same (gigabyte 1080, same vendor, all same) works without problem. This gpu which cause problem, super stable at usual Equihash algo...don't know ho to solve problem, i tried to downgrade frequency from here -200 for mem and - 100 for GPU, still restart after 10 second of work.

    Hello, I can recommend you to check the cables: riser and power, and also run a memtest for this gpu.


    Quote from: Overdrive5 on September 24, 2018, 02:16:34 AM
    EWBF,

    I just noticed you have Group and World write permissions set on your miner file in Linux. (I.E. 777)

    Is this what you want or need?

    Most executables ship set with Group and World write permissions off (I.E 755).

    Let me know either way please.

    OverDrive5

    Hello, no, these permissions are not mandatory, you can set any permissions that are convenient for you.

    Quote from: micro_m on September 24, 2018, 10:59:27 AM
    have a problem with last 0.5v miner. When I start, miner.exe usage is 142mb memory. But after 24h this process use all available memory, 3.9gb for me. Restart is helps. Someone have this ussue? How you solve it? Maybe EWBFs have option for restart, like -r in Claymoors eth miner?

    Hello, thanks for the message, this is definitely a problem, I will investigate it ASAP. Do you use windows?

  • micro_m
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 25
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    September 25, 2018, 07:21:08 AM
     #803
    Quote from: EWBF_ on September 24, 2018, 12:06:53 PM
    Hello, thanks for the message, this is definitely a problem, I will investigate it ASAP. Do you use windows?
    Hi, yes I'm using win10. Below you can see task manager screenshot after miner restart.
    http://i.piccy.info/i9/6d4b0e0b3e91d0b715d720f1699724c1/1537859828/58801/1251037/1.jpg

  • fistsofgod
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 164
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    September 25, 2018, 07:38:31 AM
     #804
    all my gpus are working properly now. I was changing risers to troubleshoot the issue but windows decided to update at the same time. im not sure if the risers did it or the windows update, im leaning towards windows update. regardless, all issues have resolved themselves

  • krnlx
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 243
    Merit: 105


    View Profile
    September 25, 2018, 11:15:04 AM
     #805
    Not working with turing GPU RTX 2080, Linux, driver 410.57

    Code:
    +-------------------------------------------------+
    |         EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.5         |
    +-------------------------------------------------+
    14:09:51 INFO: Configured pools: 1
    14:09:51 INFO: Selected pool: zero.suprnova.cc:6568
    14:09:51 INFO: Algorithm: 192_7 "ZERO_PoW"
    14:09:51 INFO: Devices: All.
    14:09:51 INFO: Temperature limit: 100
    14:09:51 INFO: Api: Disabled
    ---------------------------------------------------
    14:09:52 INFO: Target: 0078787878787878...
    14:09:52 INFO: Detected new work: 2abb
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce RTX 2080, 7951 MB i:64
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce RTX 2080, 7952 MB i:64
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce RTX 2080, 7952 MB i:64
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce RTX 2080, 7952 MB i:64
    14:10:22 Temp: GPU0: 23C GPU1: 21C GPU2: 21C GPU3: 18C
    14:10:22 GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s
    14:10:22 Total speed: 0 Sol/s

    Code:
    Tue Sep 25 14:10:55 2018       
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | NVIDIA-SMI 410.57                 Driver Version: 410.57                    |
    |-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    | GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
    | Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
    |===============================+======================+======================|
    |   0  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:01:00.0  On |                  N/A |
    |100%   23C    P2    47W 255W |   2625MiB  7951MiB |     17%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    |   1  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
    |100%   21C    P2    57W 255W |   2618MiB  7952MiB |     19%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    |   2  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
    |100%   21C    P2    42W 255W |   2618MiB  7952MiB |     17%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    |   3  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:04:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
    |100%   18C    P2    44W 255W |   2618MiB  7952MiB |     14%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
                                                                                   
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
    |  GPU       PID   Type   Process name                             Usage      |
    |=============================================================================|
    |    0      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                            12MiB |
    |    0      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    |    1      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
    |    1      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    |    2      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
    |    2      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    |    3      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
    |    3      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

  • revenant2017
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 252


    Healing Galing


    View Profile
    September 25, 2018, 06:10:09 PM
     #806
    Quote from: krnlx on September 25, 2018, 11:15:04 AM
    Not working with turing GPU RTX 2080, Linux, driver 410.57

    Code:
    +-------------------------------------------------+
    |         EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.5         |
    +-------------------------------------------------+
    14:09:51 INFO: Configured pools: 1
    14:09:51 INFO: Selected pool: zero.suprnova.cc:6568
    14:09:51 INFO: Algorithm: 192_7 "ZERO_PoW"
    14:09:51 INFO: Devices: All.
    14:09:51 INFO: Temperature limit: 100
    14:09:51 INFO: Api: Disabled
    ---------------------------------------------------
    14:09:52 INFO: Target: 0078787878787878...
    14:09:52 INFO: Detected new work: 2abb
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce RTX 2080, 7951 MB i:64
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce RTX 2080, 7952 MB i:64
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce RTX 2080, 7952 MB i:64
    14:09:52 CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce RTX 2080, 7952 MB i:64
    14:10:22 Temp: GPU0: 23C GPU1: 21C GPU2: 21C GPU3: 18C
    14:10:22 GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s
    14:10:22 Total speed: 0 Sol/s

    Code:
    Tue Sep 25 14:10:55 2018       
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | NVIDIA-SMI 410.57                 Driver Version: 410.57                    |
    |-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    | GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
    | Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
    |===============================+======================+======================|
    |   0  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:01:00.0  On |                  N/A |
    |100%   23C    P2    47W 255W |   2625MiB  7951MiB |     17%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    |   1  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
    |100%   21C    P2    57W 255W |   2618MiB  7952MiB |     19%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    |   2  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
    |100%   21C    P2    42W 255W |   2618MiB  7952MiB |     17%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
    |   3  GeForce RTX 2080    On   | 00000000:04:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
    |100%   18C    P2    44W 255W |   2618MiB  7952MiB |     14%      Default |
    +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
                                                                                   
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
    |  GPU       PID   Type   Process name                             Usage      |
    |=============================================================================|
    |    0      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                            12MiB |
    |    0      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    |    1      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
    |    1      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    |    2      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
    |    2      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    |    3      1716      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
    |    3      9699      C   ./miner                                     2601MiB |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+


    Can you try to mine at zergpool using the same algo? Someone has posted this on benchmarking the RTX 2080's.

  • fistsofgod
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 164
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    September 26, 2018, 07:13:49 AM
     #807
    EWBF_, in next ver could you add an avg speed readout for avg sol/s, averaging the sol/s over the runtime of the miner since last start, and also avg efficiency in sol/w (averaging all cards together) over the runtime since last start?

  • donlaiq
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 12
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    September 26, 2018, 05:38:34 PM
     #808
    Is EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.5 open source?

  • revenant2017
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 252


    Healing Galing


    View Profile
    September 26, 2018, 08:50:58 PM
     #809
    Quote from: donlaiq on September 26, 2018, 05:38:34 PM
    Is EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.5 open source?
    Nope. It's not opensource. Mose Equihash mining software are not opensource. If you are finding other open source alternatives, sorry but what i know is they don't publish open source software.

  • Andrey09
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 176
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    September 27, 2018, 07:39:54 AM
     #810
    Quote from: EWBF_ on September 24, 2018, 12:06:53 PM

    If i use --fee 0 my performance will lower than if  i use default --fee 2?

    EWBF ?

  • EWBF_ (OP)
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 198
    Merit: 160


    View Profile
    September 27, 2018, 04:58:15 PM
     #811
    Quote from: Andrey09 on September 27, 2018, 07:39:54 AM
    Quote from: EWBF_ on September 24, 2018, 12:06:53 PM

    If i use --fee 0 my performance will lower than if  i use default --fee 2?

    EWBF ?

    No.

    Quote from: fistsofgod on September 26, 2018, 07:13:49 AM
    EWBF_, in next ver could you add an avg speed readout for avg sol/s, averaging the sol/s over the runtime of the miner since last start, and also avg efficiency in sol/w (averaging all cards together) over the runtime since last start?

    Well, this is not a problem, only since version 0.7.

    Quote from: krnlx on September 25, 2018, 11:15:04 AM
    Not working with turing GPU RTX 2080, Linux, driver 410.57


    Unfortunately, I'm still waiting for my RTX card. But thanks for the information.

    Quote from: luky76 on September 24, 2018, 01:30:10 PM
    hi,

    start mine BTG

    with
    2x1070
    1x1080

    nooverclok

    one of 1070 start but bet error,  stoped responde,

    would like to know if posible to set intensity for each gpu, and how do that command line on bat. file.

    using w10
    tks,

    if i start mine BTG with one card work without prolem.

    Hi, if gpu does not respond, it means that the thread gets stuck in the cuda call, if this happens - you need to first check this gpu, its memory and all the cables connected to it. the --intensity parameter works similarly to --cuda_devices, for example: --cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 --intensity 64 64 1 64 sets the intensity 1 to gpu 2.

  • dwarren
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 11
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    September 27, 2018, 05:24:05 PM
     #812
    Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2

    I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?

    Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?

  • abudfv2008
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 106


    View Profile
    September 27, 2018, 06:15:11 PM
    Last edit: September 27, 2018, 07:12:49 PM by abudfv2008
     #813
    Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
    Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.

  • revenant2017
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 252


    Healing Galing


    View Profile
    September 28, 2018, 11:24:06 PM
     #814
    Quote from: abudfv2008 on September 27, 2018, 06:15:11 PM
    Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
    Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
    Does this happen oftenly? Do any balances appear after you mined for 1 day? Have experienced this on different pool but they still show the right correct balance. Maybe it's on the pools side that has the problem.

  • abudfv2008
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 106


    View Profile
    September 29, 2018, 05:11:08 AM
     #815
    Quote from: revenant2017 on September 28, 2018, 11:24:06 PM
    Quote from: abudfv2008 on September 27, 2018, 06:15:11 PM
    Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
    Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
    Does this happen oftenly? Do any balances appear after you mined for 1 day? Have experienced this on different pool but they still show the right correct balance. Maybe it's on the pools side that has the problem.
    Right now again - several hours passed since hashrate dropped and miner disappeared from pool. But miner was mining as before all that time.

  • EWBF_ (OP)
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 198
    Merit: 160


    View Profile
    September 29, 2018, 05:09:54 PM
     #816
    Version 0.6 has been released.
    In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.

    Quote from: dwarren on September 27, 2018, 05:24:05 PM
    Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2

    I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?

    Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?

    Yes, it should work.

    Quote from: abudfv2008 on September 27, 2018, 06:15:11 PM
    Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
    Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.

    The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.

  • MineOrDie
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 74
    Merit: 1


    View Profile
    September 29, 2018, 05:43:18 PM
     #817
    I see some minor performance decrease on 96_5 compared to 0.5

  • Andrey09
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 176
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    September 29, 2018, 05:43:36 PM
     #818
    Quote from: EWBF_ on September 29, 2018, 05:09:54 PM
    Version 0.6 has been released.
    In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.

    Quote from: dwarren on September 27, 2018, 05:24:05 PM
    Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2

    I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?

    Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?

    Yes, it should work.

    Quote from: abudfv2008 on September 27, 2018, 06:15:11 PM
    Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
    Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.

    The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.

    Any improvements in 0.6 according to 0.5 ?

  • EWBF_ (OP)
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 198
    Merit: 160


    View Profile
    September 29, 2018, 05:45:31 PM
     #819
    Quote from: MineOrDie on September 29, 2018, 05:43:18 PM
    I see some minor performance decrease on 96_5 compared to 0.5

    what gpu?

  • EWBF_ (OP)
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 198
    Merit: 160


    View Profile
    September 29, 2018, 05:48:03 PM
     #820
    Quote from: Andrey09 on September 29, 2018, 05:43:36 PM
    Quote from: EWBF_ on September 29, 2018, 05:09:54 PM
    Version 0.6 has been released.
    In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.

    Quote from: dwarren on September 27, 2018, 05:24:05 PM
    Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2

    I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?

    Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?

    Yes, it should work.

    Quote from: abudfv2008 on September 27, 2018, 06:15:11 PM
    Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
    Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.

    The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.

    Any improvements in 0.6 according to 0.5 ?

    I updated the performance measurements in the first post.

    96_5 uses ~1.6GB vram
     1050ti   ~7.8 KS/s  
     1060    ~14 KS/s
     1070    ~20 KS/s
     1080    ~25 KS/s
     1080ti    ~37 KS/s

    192_7 uses ~2.5GB vram
     1050ti    ~8 S/s
     1060    ~15 S/s
     1070    ~22 S/s
     1080    ~24 S/s
     1080ti    ~35 S/s

    144_5 uses ~1.63GB vram
     1050ti   ~18 S/s  
     1060    ~30 S/s
     1070    ~45 S/s
     1080    ~50 S/s
     1080ti    ~75 S/s

    210_9(aion) uses 1.2G vram
     1050ti   ~75 S/s
     1060    ~130 S/s
     1070    ~190 S/s
     1080    ~210 S/s
     1080ti  ~320 S/s

    for 144_5    3 - 15 %
    for 192_7   ~10 %
    for 96_5     ~2-5 %
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
      Print  
Page 40
Viewing Page: 41

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com