<<  >> (p.3)
    Author Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Tenebrix, a CPU-friendly, GPU-hostile cryptocurrency  (Read 127361 times)

    • Raoul Duke
    aka psy
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1386
    Merit: 1002



    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:10:27 AM
     #41
    No, plain English for Yet Another Useless Piece of Shit Currency...

    Still trying to decide what's worse, if you and Artforz losing your time to do this or all this morons mining it lol

  • caston
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 500



    View Profile WWW
    September 26, 2011, 10:11:20 AM
     #42
    OK I have it built now:
    Code:
    ./minerd --user username --pass password
    [2011-09-26 18:10:41] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
    [2011-09-26 18:10:41] HTTP request failed: couldn't connect to host
    [2011-09-26 18:10:41] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
    [2011-09-26 18:10:42] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
    [2011-09-26 18:10:43] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
    [2011-09-26 18:10:44] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
    [2011-09-26 18:10:45] 4 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
    [2011-09-26 18:11:11] HTTP request failed: couldn't connect to host
    [2011-09-26 18:11:11] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds

    I'm running the bitcoin-qt. I couldn't find a bitcoind.
    bitcoin BTC: 1MikVUu1DauWB33T5diyforbQjTWJ9D4RF
    bitcoin cash: 1JdkCGuW4LSgqYiM6QS7zTzAttD9MNAsiK

    -updated 3rd December 2017

  • racerguy
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 270
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:21:53 AM
     #43
    Is anyone else getting a lot of false proof of works?  around 80% of my proof of works turn out like the one below.

    [2011-09-26 17:50:30] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: false (booooo)

  • caston
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 500



    View Profile WWW
    September 26, 2011, 10:24:03 AM
     #44
    Quote from: racerguy on September 26, 2011, 10:21:53 AM
    Is anyone else getting a lot of false proof of works?  around 80% of my proof of works turn out like the one below.

    [2011-09-26 17:50:30] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: false (booooo)

    I can't even figure out how to get the miner running.

    are you using minerd?
    bitcoin BTC: 1MikVUu1DauWB33T5diyforbQjTWJ9D4RF
    bitcoin cash: 1JdkCGuW4LSgqYiM6QS7zTzAttD9MNAsiK

    -updated 3rd December 2017

  • ahitman
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 302
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:25:13 AM
     #45
    To mine use the batch file in the folder.

    Im getting many False proofs as well. How do I fix this?

    Also is there any exchange for these coins yet?

  • Lolcust (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 11

    Hillariously voracious


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:26:05 AM
     #46
    Quote from: racerguy on September 26, 2011, 10:21:53 AM
    Is anyone else getting a lot of false proof of works?  around 80% of my proof of works turn out like the one below.

    [2011-09-26 17:50:30] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: false (booooo)

    Try setting -s in your miner to 5
    Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

    Feed the Lolcust!
    NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
    BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
    GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK

  • caston
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 500



    View Profile WWW
    September 26, 2011, 10:31:21 AM
     #47
    OK I got it working with : ./minerd --user 1 --pass 1 --url http://127.0.0.1:8697


    But I'm not sure if I'm getting the right hash rate...

    ./minerd --user 1 --pass 1 --url http://127.0.0.1:8697
    [2011-09-26 18:30:19] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
    [2011-09-26 18:30:20] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
    [2011-09-26 18:30:21] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
    [2011-09-26 18:30:22] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
    [2011-09-26 18:30:23] 4 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
    [2011-09-26 18:31:00] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 1.66 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:01] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 1.65 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:02] thread 0: 65535 hashes, 1.53 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:04] thread 1: 8191 hashes, 1.66 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:06] thread 2: 8191 hashes, 1.66 khash/sec


    Looks a little slow although I must admit I don't usually CPU mine

    what hashrates are you guys getting?
    bitcoin BTC: 1MikVUu1DauWB33T5diyforbQjTWJ9D4RF
    bitcoin cash: 1JdkCGuW4LSgqYiM6QS7zTzAttD9MNAsiK

    -updated 3rd December 2017

  • Lolcust (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 11

    Hillariously voracious


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:39:24 AM
     #48
    Quote from: psy on September 26, 2011, 10:10:27 AM
    No, plain English for Yet Another Useless Piece of Shit Currency...

    Still trying to decide what's worse, if you and Artforz losing your time to do this or all this morons mining it lol

    With all due respect to your opinion, I believe that in a world where i0coin is being actually sold (or perhaps it would be better to say actually bought  Roll Eyes) it is most unfair to call a cryptocurrency with novel PoW that significantly changes adoption dynamics "Useless Piece of Shit" :-P

    Quote from: caston on September 26, 2011, 10:31:21 AM
    OK I got it working with : ./minerd --user 1 --pass 1 --url http://127.0.0.1:8697


    But I'm not sure if I'm getting the right hash rate...

    ./minerd --user 1 --pass 1 --url http://127.0.0.1:8697
    [2011-09-26 18:30:19] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
    [2011-09-26 18:30:20] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
    [2011-09-26 18:30:21] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
    [2011-09-26 18:30:22] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
    [2011-09-26 18:30:23] 4 miner threads started, using SHA256 'scrypt' algorithm.
    [2011-09-26 18:31:00] thread 1: 65535 hashes, 1.66 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:01] thread 2: 65535 hashes, 1.65 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:02] thread 0: 65535 hashes, 1.53 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:04] thread 1: 8191 hashes, 1.66 khash/sec
    [2011-09-26 18:31:06] thread 2: 8191 hashes, 1.66 khash/sec


    Looks a little slow although I must admit I don't usually CPU mine

    what are you guys getting?

    Typical hashrates for TBX.

    Do mind that most GPU implementations will be notably slower with modern GPUs.
    Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

    Feed the Lolcust!
    NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
    BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
    GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK

  • caston
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 500



    View Profile WWW
    September 26, 2011, 10:43:21 AM
     #49
    Quote from: Lolcust on September 26, 2011, 10:39:24 AM

    Typical hashrates for TBX.



    Thank you


    ahh then I wonder how long until I find a  block at this rate?
    bitcoin BTC: 1MikVUu1DauWB33T5diyforbQjTWJ9D4RF
    bitcoin cash: 1JdkCGuW4LSgqYiM6QS7zTzAttD9MNAsiK

    -updated 3rd December 2017

  • racerguy
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 270
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:45:15 AM
     #50
    thanks, switching -s to 5 fixes it.

    I'm getting 1.2-3khashes on my q9400@3.2ghz and 1.08khash on my sisters q8200.

  • Lolcust (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 11

    Hillariously voracious


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:55:27 AM
     #51
    "tPKbCkqgio92KVJj4cQAXqs7Ng4dfbhFxR","-765.00"

    "tFCq32aZFqa13wrab6m55Nv3R53tk4zkL8","-765.00"

    "tVEFkyC8VkXyMfpCyeM78k2nBC6nYUHKS4","-765.00"

    "t9ArZXPEa4hiPY22WXDyLu8LW34b13zVMB","-765.00"

    "tUK2EQTMF6cN6vuNEfJtVf1BMqarvEZJBL","-765.00"

    Sent. Also, other people who posted their addresses before this message will recieve a sum too, a smaller one tho Smiley
    Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

    Feed the Lolcust!
    NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
    BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
    GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK

  • EskimoBob
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 910
    Merit: 1000


    Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 10:56:06 AM
     #52
    Quote from: Lolcust on September 26, 2011, 10:08:07 AM
    Quote from: EskimoBob on September 26, 2011, 09:56:01 AM
    Code:
    make
    make  all-recursive
    make[1]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    Making all in compat
    make[2]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[3]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
    make[3]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[2]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[2]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing     -g -O2 -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
    cpu-miner.c: In function ‘parse_arg’:
    cpu-miner.c:786: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘json_load_file’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
    /usr/include/jansson.h:221: note: expected ‘size_t’ but argument is of type ‘struct json_error_t *’
    cpu-miner.c:786: error: too few arguments to function ‘json_load_file’
    make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
    make[2]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    make: *** [all] Error 2

    Any ideas whats wrong here?


    I vaguely suspect jansson is to blame. What's dependency versions and what are you building it on (and for) ?

    I've built it for windows from under Fedora 15 (Eh, I know) vm and under ubuntu for, well, ubuntu.



    in Gentoo for Gentoo

    dev-libs/jansson Installed versions:  2.0.1
    and works fine with other *coin miners/apps
    While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
    BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....

  • Lolcust (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 11

    Hillariously voracious


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 11:01:04 AM
     #53
    Quote from: EskimoBob on September 26, 2011, 10:56:06 AM
    Quote from: Lolcust on September 26, 2011, 10:08:07 AM
    Quote from: EskimoBob on September 26, 2011, 09:56:01 AM
    Code:
    make
    make  all-recursive
    make[1]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    Making all in compat
    make[2]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[3]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
    make[3]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[2]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner/compat'
    make[2]: Entering directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing     -g -O2 -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
    cpu-miner.c: In function ‘parse_arg’:
    cpu-miner.c:786: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘json_load_file’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
    /usr/include/jansson.h:221: note: expected ‘size_t’ but argument is of type ‘struct json_error_t *’
    cpu-miner.c:786: error: too few arguments to function ‘json_load_file’
    make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
    make[2]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/Tenebrix-miner'
    make: *** [all] Error 2

    Any ideas whats wrong here?


    I vaguely suspect jansson is to blame. What's dependency versions and what are you building it on (and for) ?

    I've built it for windows from under Fedora 15 (Eh, I know) vm and under ubuntu for, well, ubuntu.



    in Gentoo for Gentoo

    dev-libs/jansson Installed versions:  2.0.1
    and works fine with other *coin miners/apps


    Did you try going  autogen.sh route as described in readme ( needs  automake and autoconf)?
    Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

    Feed the Lolcust!
    NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
    BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
    GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK

  • doublec
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1078
    Merit: 1005


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 11:04:52 AM
     #54
    Quote from: EskimoBob on September 26, 2011, 10:56:06 AM
    cpu-miner.c:786: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘json_load_file’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
    /usr/include/jansson.h:221: note: expected ‘size_t’ but argument is of type ‘struct json_error_t *’
    cpu-miner.c:786: error: too few arguments to function ‘json_load_file’

    You'll need to tweak the call to json_loads. It changed the number of arguments it accepted between the 1.x and 2.x versions of libjansson.

  • Lolcust (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 11

    Hillariously voracious


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 11:11:30 AM
     #55
    Hm, indeed.

    doublec, I wonder why it compiles allright on my ubuntu when I go the autogen route... somewhat weird.
    Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

    Feed the Lolcust!
    NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
    BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
    GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK

  • caston
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 500



    View Profile WWW
    September 26, 2011, 11:13:13 AM
     #56
    Rejuvepedia is accepting donations at:

    tVxuc4sgkCTsDLZPSaZPc4TDxt1mz47Rsi


    http://www.rejuvepedia.org/index.php?title=Donations

    Oh and I seem to have mined 10 blocks but they haven't come up in my balance yet.. this is actually pretty fun.
    bitcoin BTC: 1MikVUu1DauWB33T5diyforbQjTWJ9D4RF
    bitcoin cash: 1JdkCGuW4LSgqYiM6QS7zTzAttD9MNAsiK

    -updated 3rd December 2017

  • racerguy
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 270
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 11:16:35 AM
     #57
    yes today is the first time I've ever mined a block in anything, up to 31 blocks so far today.

  • EskimoBob
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 910
    Merit: 1000


    Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 11:33:11 AM
     #58
    Quote from: doublec on September 26, 2011, 11:04:52 AM
    Quote from: EskimoBob on September 26, 2011, 10:56:06 AM
    cpu-miner.c:786: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘json_load_file’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
    /usr/include/jansson.h:221: note: expected ‘size_t’ but argument is of type ‘struct json_error_t *’
    cpu-miner.c:786: error: too few arguments to function ‘json_load_file’

    You'll need to tweak the call to json_loads. It changed the number of arguments it accepted between the 1.x and 2.x versions of libjansson.

    I followed the README  doc:

    Code:
    Basic *nix build instructions:
            ./autogen.sh    # only needed if building from git repo
            CFLAGS="-O3 -Wall -msse2" ./configure
            make


    autogen whines:

    Code:
      ./autogen.sh
    configure.ac:95: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body
    ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2662: _AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2679: AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4:606: AS_IF is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2032: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2053: AC_CACHE_CHECK is expanded from...
    /usr/share/aclocal/libcurl.m4:38: LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG is expanded from...
    configure.ac:95: the top level
    configure.ac:95: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body
    ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2662: _AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2679: AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4:606: AS_IF is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2032: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2053: AC_CACHE_CHECK is expanded from...
    aclocal.m4:59: LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG is expanded from...
    configure.ac:95: the top level
    configure.ac:95: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body
    ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2662: _AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2679: AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4:606: AS_IF is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2032: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2053: AC_CACHE_CHECK is expanded from...
    aclocal.m4:59: LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG is expanded from...
    configure.ac:95: the top level
    configure.ac:95: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body
    ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2662: _AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2679: AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from...
    ../../lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4:606: AS_IF is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2032: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from...
    ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2053: AC_CACHE_CHECK is expanded from...
    aclocal.m4:59: LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG is expanded from...
    configure.ac:95: the top level


    BTW, client compiles fine but in Gentoo you probably need top add '-I/usr/include/db4.8/' to 'make' (if you get a can not find db_cxx.h error) 

    Can someone tweak the call to json_loads adn push it to git? 


    While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
    BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....

  • EskimoBob
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 910
    Merit: 1000


    Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 12:02:53 PM
     #59
    Quote from: racerguy on September 26, 2011, 10:45:15 AM
    thanks, switching -s to 5 fixes it.

    I'm getting 1.2-3khashes on my q9400@3.2ghz and 1.08khash on my sisters q8200.

    I had --s  120
    now I have --s 5 and I still get boooo's
    While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
    BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....

  • CosicMiner
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 135
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    September 26, 2011, 12:03:14 PM
     #60
    Thank you Lolcust for the generous starting bounty!
    Been mining during the night with 2 spare cores on my i5 2500k (Dedicated one core to 100% cpu bug for gpu mining and one core left free for system stability.) and my second rig is mining with C2D E6750. Found nearly 30 blocks so far.
    Will unleash it on all of the i5 cores during the day to see how it affects overall system performance and gpu mining.

    Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
      Print  
Page 2
Viewing Page: 3

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com