WOW it really shows how things can degenerate on here. I am not in any way affiliated with SC or CoinHunter. I never even mined SC1 because of finding about it late. I am just seeing the features in SC2 are way better than Tenebrix 7.7 million premined coins and failbrix attacked by you.

Nope. Neither can you disprove that you attacked Fairbrix because it would kill Tenecrap

LOL the entertainment value in these forums is just over 9000 !!! Might as well rename it to comedycoin

Good puppet master.

Now go pump and dump them brix !!! Wonder why TBX price is so low now  

On another note, what about our genius' revelation ? BitcoinExpress said that virtually all these CPU only currencies can easily be made into GPU currencies by IE9 hardware accelerator !? How true is that for Tenebrix ?

can we get some retailer love for the brix

So you are one of the early miners who hope to get rich with TBX? 

If I remember correctly, he only openly explained the pre-mine after he got called out on it.  Pre-mined coins were not mentioned in the OP or the first few pages.

On an unrelated note, the FBX attack could have been ANYONE with an AWS account.  It is trivial to 51% chains when they are just starting.

If that's the case they should release this for everyone to use.

I did PM him for more details and I didn't get a reply. If it was true wouldn't we see the difficulty go up by like a factor of  >1000 ?

The script source code is here: http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/GRAY/Crypt-Scrypt-0.05/src/src/lib/crypto/crypto_scrypt-sse.c

But...  this algorithm is supposed to be memory-hard but only takes 7MB of RAM on my system? (minerd.exe)  But maybe memory-hard in this instance refers to cache size on the CPU?  GPUs are based around something requiring large amounts of sequential memory access, and if the data is not constantly being reused but instead overwritten GPU computing might be inefficient.  An easy way of destroying GPU efficiency is just to make an algorithm require it to access memory randomly instead of sequentially, but the same goes for CPUs...  So the only thing I can think of that this algorithm would do to make it GPU proof would be requiring to read and write to the cache memory that is on board a lot.  There should be no way GPUs can compete with large CPU level 2 and 3 caches that have way faster write rates.