<<  >> (p.21)
    Author Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Tenebrix, a CPU-friendly, GPU-hostile cryptocurrency  (Read 127371 times)

    • racerguy
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 270
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    October 01, 2011, 07:37:58 PM
     #401
    Quote from: Matoking on October 01, 2011, 07:29:09 PM
    The port is 8337 like with some Bitcoin mining pools.

    thanks that did it.

  • ama
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 10


    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 07:40:34 PM
     #402
    Quote from: Matoking on October 01, 2011, 07:29:09 PM
    The port is 8337 like with some Bitcoin mining pools.

    Wouldn't you be mining BTC if you use that port?

  • Matoking
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 352
    Merit: 250

    Firstbits: 1m8xa


    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 07:41:13 PM
     #403
    No, just set your worker to TBX Proportional and it will be fine.
    BTC : 1CcpmVDLvR7DgA5deFGScoNhiEtiJnh6H4 - LTC : LYTnoXAHNsemMB2jhCSi1znQqnfupdRkSy
    Bitcoin-otc
    BitBin - earn bitcoins with your pastes!

  • simplecoin
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 406
    Merit: 250



    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 07:43:18 PM
     #404
    Stats readout is wrong, but the pool is running quite happily.
    Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk

  • kjlimo
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2142
    Merit: 1037


    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 07:49:33 PM
     #405
    Can you use guiminer?  Which miner should we be using?  Ufasoft? CUDA?
    Coinbase for selling BTCs
    Fold for spending BTCs
    PM me with any questions on these sites/apps! 



    RIP: http://www.montybitcoin.com


    or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
    CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.

  • Matoking
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 352
    Merit: 250

    Firstbits: 1m8xa


    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 07:50:12 PM
     #406
    A miner that supports scrypt. The only one that supports scrypt at the moment is minerd which comes with the Tenebrix pack. And no, you can't use anything like CUDA, it would be against the Tenebrix's point of being a GPU-hostile cryptocurrency. Tongue
    BTC : 1CcpmVDLvR7DgA5deFGScoNhiEtiJnh6H4 - LTC : LYTnoXAHNsemMB2jhCSi1znQqnfupdRkSy
    Bitcoin-otc
    BitBin - earn bitcoins with your pastes!

  • racerguy
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 270
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    October 01, 2011, 07:51:17 PM
     #407
    [2011-10-02 03:47:10] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
     
    mining on simplecoin, did I find a 'share' like you do bitcoin mining or did i find a block?

  • simplecoin
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 406
    Merit: 250



    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 07:52:32 PM
     #408
    Quote from: racerguy on October 01, 2011, 07:51:17 PM
    [2011-10-02 03:47:10] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
     
    mining on simplecoin, did I find a 'share' like you do bitcoin mining or did i find a block?

    Just a share. The miner readouts will be success for anything that is not a reject.

    True found blocks are only seen on the website under TBX Proportional Stats.
    Donations: 1VjGJHPtLodwCFBDWsHJMdEhqRcRKdBQk

  • Lolcust (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 11

    Hillariously voracious


    View Profile
    October 01, 2011, 07:53:57 PM
     #409
    @ Matoking
    Well, he can - if he asks Art he might give him the optimized GPU miner for tenebrix. A good  radeon will be slightly  slower than 2-3 cores of a recent-ish Phenom though Cheesy

    @racerguy

    a share
    Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

    Feed the Lolcust!
    NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
    BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
    GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK

  • dishwara
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1855
    Merit: 1016



    View Profile
    October 01, 2011, 08:05:09 PM
     #410
    so only " PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)" is a share accepted by simplecoin.us?
    what about all the hashes showing like this
    Code:
    [2011-10-02 00:53:46] thread 0: 38059 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:53:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
    [2011-10-02 00:54:32] thread 1: 66285 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:54:48] thread 0: 67162 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:55:32] thread 1: 65198 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:55:48] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:56:32] thread 1: 66303 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:56:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:57:31] thread 1: 65216 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:57:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:58:32] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:58:50] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:59:34] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:59:50] thread 0: 64977 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:00:01] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from ser
    [2011-10-02 01:00:35] longpoll failed, sleeping for 30s
    [2011-10-02 01:00:38] thread 1: 65233 hashes, 1.03 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:00:40] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:00:40] thread 0: 50813 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:10
    0] thread 1: 1280 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:00:43] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2[2011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 0: 3882 hashes, 1.17 khash/sec
    011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 1: 3519 hashes, 1.16 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:01:48] thread 1: 70380 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:01:54] thread 0: 77640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:02:48] thread 1: 65981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:02:53] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:02:53] thread 0: [64926 hashes, 2011-10-02 01:02
    85 hashes, 1.110 khash/sec
    .12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:03:14] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10[2011-10-0-02 02 01:03:14] thread 0: 22568 hashes, 11:.
    03:14] thread 1: 22010 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:04:14] thread 1: 62885 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:04:15] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:05:12] thread 1: 63950 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:05:14] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:06:13] thread 1: 66155 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:06:14] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:07:14] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:07:15] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:08:13] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:08:14] thread 0: 64497 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:08:36] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:08:36] thread 1: 25654 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:08
    480 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:09:39] thread 0: 66763 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:09:41] thread 1: 66923 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:10:07] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 0: 29683 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 1: 28469 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 0: 63606 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 1: 63264 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:12:05] thread 0: 66953 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:12:07] thread 1: 66593 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:12:09] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:12:09] thread 0: 3532 hash[2011-10-02 01:12:09]
    shes, es, 1.07 khash/sec
    1.00 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:13:01] thread 1: 56400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:13:13] thread 0: 70640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:14:01] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:14:14] thread 0: 67276 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:15:03] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:15:15] thread 0: 66173 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:02] thread 1: 64211 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:14] thread 0: 64038 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:41] thread 1: 43738 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:41] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
    [2011-10-02 01:17:13] thread 0: 66246 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:17:28] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 [2011-10-02 01:17:28] thre01:17:28] thread 0: 16319
    361.09 khash/se5 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    c
    [2011-10-02 01:17:38] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:17:38] thread 1: 11150 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:17
    860 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
    1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:18:40] thread 1: 66900 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:18:45] thread 0: 72400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:19:40] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:19:45] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:20:38] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:20:43] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:21:38] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:21:43] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:22:40] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:22:45] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:22:52] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:22:52] thread 1: 13555 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:22
    98 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:23:53] thread 0: 65982 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:23:55] thread 1: 67775 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:24:12] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01[2011-10-02 01:24:12] thread 1: 18286 hashes, 1.0
    :24:12] thread 0: 20109 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:25:11] thread 1: 64538 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:25:13] thread 0: 67030 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:10] thread 1: 65631 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:13] thread 0: 65931 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:27] thread 1: 18202 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:27] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
    [2011-10-02 01:27:12] thread 0: 67048 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:27:28] thread 1: 68257 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:28:04] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 0: 57784 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 1: 40762 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:29:06] thread 0: 67981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:29:07] thread 1: 67936 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:29:59] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:29:59] thread 1: 59018 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:29
    351 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:31:01] thread 0: 67189 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:31:02] thread 1: 68097 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:31:10] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:31:10] thread 0: 9738 hashes, [2011-10-02 101:31
    82 hashes, .12 khash/sec
    1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:32:09] thread 0: 64920 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:32:12] thread 1: 68417 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:33:07] thread 0: 66020 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:33:10] thread 1: 66210 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:34:07] thread 0: 68296 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:34:10] thread 1: 68493 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec

  • bulanula
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 518
    Merit: 500



    View Profile
    October 01, 2011, 08:08:52 PM
     #411
    Quote from: Lolcust on October 01, 2011, 07:53:57 PM
    @ Matoking
    Well, he can - if he asks Art he might give him the optimized GPU miner for tenebrix. A good  radeon will be slightly  slower than 2-3 cores of a recent-ish Phenom though Cheesy

    @racerguy

    a share

    Well then this still is a bit of a fail for me. The CPU advantage is not that big really so then 2 Radeons = Phenom 1100T is not that big advantage for CPU people. So on a rig with 1x 1100T and 4x 6990 will be just like 5x 1100T which is still advantageous. Need to make GPU like equal to less than 1 core etc.

  • Matoking
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 352
    Merit: 250

    Firstbits: 1m8xa


    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 08:11:13 PM
     #412
    Quote from: dishwara on October 01, 2011, 08:05:09 PM
    so only " PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)" is a share accepted by simplecoin.us?
    what about all the hashes showing like this
    Code:
    [2011-10-02 00:53:46] thread 0: 38059 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:53:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
    [2011-10-02 00:54:32] thread 1: 66285 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:54:48] thread 0: 67162 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:55:32] thread 1: 65198 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:55:48] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:56:32] thread 1: 66303 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:56:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:57:31] thread 1: 65216 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:57:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:58:32] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:58:50] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:59:34] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 00:59:50] thread 0: 64977 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:00:01] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from ser
    [2011-10-02 01:00:35] longpoll failed, sleeping for 30s
    [2011-10-02 01:00:38] thread 1: 65233 hashes, 1.03 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:00:40] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:00:40] thread 0: 50813 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:10
    0] thread 1: 1280 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:00:43] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2[2011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 0: 3882 hashes, 1.17 khash/sec
    011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 1: 3519 hashes, 1.16 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:01:48] thread 1: 70380 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:01:54] thread 0: 77640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:02:48] thread 1: 65981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:02:53] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:02:53] thread 0: [64926 hashes, 2011-10-02 01:02
    85 hashes, 1.110 khash/sec
    .12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:03:14] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10[2011-10-0-02 02 01:03:14] thread 0: 22568 hashes, 11:.
    03:14] thread 1: 22010 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:04:14] thread 1: 62885 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:04:15] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:05:12] thread 1: 63950 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:05:14] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:06:13] thread 1: 66155 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:06:14] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:07:14] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:07:15] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:08:13] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:08:14] thread 0: 64497 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:08:36] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:08:36] thread 1: 25654 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:08
    480 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:09:39] thread 0: 66763 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:09:41] thread 1: 66923 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:10:07] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 0: 29683 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 1: 28469 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 0: 63606 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 1: 63264 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:12:05] thread 0: 66953 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:12:07] thread 1: 66593 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:12:09] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:12:09] thread 0: 3532 hash[2011-10-02 01:12:09]
    shes, es, 1.07 khash/sec
    1.00 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:13:01] thread 1: 56400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:13:13] thread 0: 70640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:14:01] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:14:14] thread 0: 67276 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:15:03] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:15:15] thread 0: 66173 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:02] thread 1: 64211 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:14] thread 0: 64038 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:41] thread 1: 43738 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:16:41] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
    [2011-10-02 01:17:13] thread 0: 66246 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:17:28] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 [2011-10-02 01:17:28] thre01:17:28] thread 0: 16319
    361.09 khash/se5 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    c
    [2011-10-02 01:17:38] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:17:38] thread 1: 11150 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:17
    860 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
    1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:18:40] thread 1: 66900 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:18:45] thread 0: 72400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:19:40] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:19:45] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:20:38] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:20:43] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:21:38] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:21:43] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:22:40] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:22:45] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:22:52] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:22:52] thread 1: 13555 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:22
    98 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:23:53] thread 0: 65982 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:23:55] thread 1: 67775 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:24:12] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01[2011-10-02 01:24:12] thread 1: 18286 hashes, 1.0
    :24:12] thread 0: 20109 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:25:11] thread 1: 64538 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:25:13] thread 0: 67030 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:10] thread 1: 65631 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:13] thread 0: 65931 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:27] thread 1: 18202 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:26:27] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
    [2011-10-02 01:27:12] thread 0: 67048 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:27:28] thread 1: 68257 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:28:04] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 0: 57784 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 1: 40762 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:29:06] thread 0: 67981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:29:07] thread 1: 67936 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:29:59] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:29:59] thread 1: 59018 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:29
    351 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
    1.13 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:31:01] thread 0: 67189 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:31:02] thread 1: 68097 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:31:10] LONGPOLL detected new block
    [2011-10-02 01:31:10] thread 0: 9738 hashes, [2011-10-02 101:31
    82 hashes, .12 khash/sec
    1.12 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:32:09] thread 0: 64920 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:32:12] thread 1: 68417 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:33:07] thread 0: 66020 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:33:10] thread 1: 66210 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:34:07] thread 0: 68296 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
    [2011-10-02 01:34:10] thread 1: 68493 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec

    LONGPOLLs mean that a new block has been created to the Tenebrix network rendering all your current work units void.
    Those hashing speeds mean how many times the miner has tried to find a match for that work unit before requesting a new one. Also explains why you get messages more frequently when you are solo mining, the miner requests new work units every five seconds when you are solo mining unlike pools.
    BTC : 1CcpmVDLvR7DgA5deFGScoNhiEtiJnh6H4 - LTC : LYTnoXAHNsemMB2jhCSi1znQqnfupdRkSy
    Bitcoin-otc
    BitBin - earn bitcoins with your pastes!

  • dishwara
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1855
    Merit: 1016



    View Profile
    October 01, 2011, 08:16:01 PM
     #413
    so how many seconds once i have to ask work unit for pool?

  • Matoking
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 352
    Merit: 250

    Firstbits: 1m8xa


    View Profile WWW
    October 01, 2011, 08:20:22 PM
     #414
    The Simplecoin pool seems to send new work units every minute instead of every five seconds. Since the pool has longpolling it reduces the chance of stale shares (shares that became invalid because they were sent after a new block was generated)

    And no, you don't have to do anything of that manually.
    BTC : 1CcpmVDLvR7DgA5deFGScoNhiEtiJnh6H4 - LTC : LYTnoXAHNsemMB2jhCSi1znQqnfupdRkSy
    Bitcoin-otc
    BitBin - earn bitcoins with your pastes!

  • Bobnova
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    October 02, 2011, 01:45:15 AM
    Last edit: October 02, 2011, 02:53:14 AM by Bobnova
     #415
    Finally got the (*@&%* minerd to compile in linux.
    It was worth the effort, close to double the hashes of running the windows one in linux.
    Too bad I didn't get it fixed during super low difficulty Sad

    Anyway, in case y'all have the same issue:
    Edit ./configure to not check the libcurl version.
    Edit the makefile and specify the path to libcurl in place of the @LIBCURL@ that is in there stock.
    Presto!
    (/usr/local/lib/libcurl.so is the path)

    EDIT:
    Do I get development funds for finding and finding a workaround for an issue that caused problems for multiple people? Cheesy
    BTC:  1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP

  • ama
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 10


    View Profile WWW
    October 02, 2011, 02:38:32 AM
     #416
    Thanks to ArtForz, who helped finding the problem and jtobey, who has fixed the bug causing the problem in is software, the block explorer at

    http://blockexplorer.sytes.net/

    is now up to the current block for TBX!

    Sorry for the inconveniences caused by this for the last 36 hours or so.

    And if you find the explorer useful, please consider donating to the http://blockexplorer.sytes.net/ donation addresses and/or to the author of the Abe software (links to his donation addresses at the bottom of my site).

  • demkd
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 242
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    October 02, 2011, 02:42:40 AM
    Last edit: October 02, 2011, 03:17:48 AM by demkd
     #417
    Where can I find sources of modified minerd?
    And what's wrong with the pool? Mined over hour at ~10Khs but...
    TBX Estimate: 0.14274062 TBX Unconfirmed: 0.00000000 TBX Balance: 0.00000000 TBX
    Wrong stats?

  • ama
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 112
    Merit: 10


    View Profile WWW
    October 02, 2011, 02:52:03 AM
     #418
    Quote from: demkd on October 02, 2011, 02:42:40 AM
    And what's wrong with the pool? Mined over hour at ~10Khz but...
    TBX Estimate: 0.14274062 TBX Unconfirmed: 0.00000000 TBX Balance: 0.00000000 TBX

    I don't know, but I'm back to mining cents of I0coin with my tiny mining power (CPU and an old Nvidia) after shortly trying the pool and getting nothing.    Grin

  • Moray
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 143
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    October 02, 2011, 06:18:59 AM
     #419
    After about 10 hours of mining in the pool- my estimates are 0.19xx. Switched to solo, and 10 minutes later I found a block. There's something really wrong in the balance stats of the pool...

  • kjlimo
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2142
    Merit: 1037


    View Profile WWW
    October 02, 2011, 07:52:00 AM
     #420
    Quote from: Moray on October 02, 2011, 06:18:59 AM
    After about 10 hours of mining in the pool- my estimates are 0.19xx. Switched to solo, and 10 minutes later I found a block. There's something really wrong in the balance stats of the pool...

    Ya, seems like it's still in test mode or something?
    Coinbase for selling BTCs
    Fold for spending BTCs
    PM me with any questions on these sites/apps! 



    RIP: http://www.montybitcoin.com


    or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
    CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
      Print  
Page 20
Viewing Page: 21

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com