You have done amazing job! Nn nvidia front there are many good miners like zenemy, cryptodredge, t-rex. Theres not much on team red side - cryptonight and ethash algos only basically. With very few exceptions. I am happy that i could mine lyra2z and now phi2 with your miner on my amd rigs. Still with little, but profit.
Thank you!

After cnv8 whats next planned algo?

I already gave "the best miner ever" title to teamredminer...no doubt about it.
It is great that you intend to implement cn v8 in the miner but I think that you should focus on some other algos unless you're sure that your v8 miner will provide significantly better hashrate. There are already a lot of great cn miners with a lot of builtin features (watchdogs,api,customscripts support,multi-cn algo switch fast/v8/heavy/haven etc.). It's your call of cores, but I think that you should focus on upcoming Zcoin hardfork new mining algo : https://zcoin.io/mtp-hard-fork-what-you-need-to-know/ and possibly to new upcoming Ethereum Prog-Pow.
It's so frustrating that nvidia miners always have mining software ready just on time and we with amd need to wait for several months after launch.

We know our hashrates for CNv8 now, only miner work left. Imho it was time well spent, but we should be announcing shortly and everyone can decide for themselves. However, one of our main goals with this miner was to shoot down the stupid "truths" that some algos are for Nvidia only, and I can agree that working on CNv8 doesn't really fit that profile - it's rather already an AMD only algo .

Me and todxx will decide what to focus on next shortly, we have quite a few options. Adding all CN variants and the Heavy family is one thing. Going for Zcoin MTP or x16r is another, just to take a few examples. We might also branch out and do parallel work between us. ZCoin's MTP is a mess though, they have killed the normal stratum protocol for a pool/miner, it really is a shame. I wish they could have tweaked a few design decisions and mining would continue to work as usual, but no. Miners now need to send large proofs (> 150kb or something) for every share to the pool. We did provide our point-of-view to the Zcoin team, but to little avail.

was version 0.3.3 re-released?... github says it was released 2 days ago, however, i got it from github nine days ago.

Team Red Miner version 0.3.3
[2018-10-27 17:33:43] Failed to initialize device number 0.


with 2 vega 56 under windows, latest drivers

Confirmed working with Awesome Miner and MinerStats. What is your command line, and do you connect from the same computer or some other machine on the network?

Any idea when you expect the CNv8 release?

Have you tested it on Linux with multiple Vegas?

New release v0.3.4 posted!

This version now includes cryptonight v8 support!
Also better reporting of GPU hashrates and reporting of submitted/accepted/rejected shares.
Please note that we have changed how we report GPU hashrates.  Hashrates reported by the miner are now the full GPU hashrates.  Previously hashrates reported were after dev fee deduction.

Since we expect a lot of questions and comments about cryptonight v8, we have created a new thread for it here.
Please post any cryptonight v8 related comments and questions in that thread.

Try adding --platform=1 to your bat file.

That is surprising really, we haven't touched those kernels at all, should be exactly the same. On my Windows box, running the v0.3.2 vs 0.3.4 for a few mins with a 580+560+Vega 64, I get the following:

v0.3.2

[2018-10-30 13:10:12] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 4.919Mh/s (4.320Mh/s)
[2018-10-30 13:10:12] Stats GPU 1 - phi2: 2.034Mh/s (1.834Mh/s)
[2018-10-30 13:10:12] Stats GPU 2 - phi2: 9.880Mh/s (8.948Mh/s)
[2018-10-30 13:10:12] Stats Total - phi2: 16.832Mh/s (15.103Mh/s)


vs

v0.3.4

[2018-10-30 13:05:52] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 5.076Mh/s, avg 5.073Mh/s, pool 5.089Mh/s 27/0
[2018-10-30 13:05:52] Stats GPU 1 - phi2: 2.087Mh/s, avg 2.114Mh/s, pool 1.926Mh/s 8/0
[2018-10-30 13:05:52] Stats GPU 2 - phi2: 10.18Mh/s, avg 10.18Mh/s, pool 12.08Mh/s 55/0
[2018-10-30 13:05:52] Stats Total - phi2: 17.34Mh/s, avg 17.36Mh/s, pool 19.10Mh/s


In v0.3.2 we displayed the net user hashrate (3% dev fee subtracted), this has changed in 0.3.4, we now display the raw hashrate. Adjusting for that change: 17.36 * 0.97 = 16.84, close enough to 16.832. So, I don't see a regression bug on my Windows box at least.

Can you give a quick description of your setup (os/driver/gpus) and what you're seeing?

Cheers, K