We all seem to focus on the how holding bitcoin will be of advantage or disadvantage to bitcoin investors. My questions is what if all Bitcoin were sold what will be the faith of those who have been holding for quite some time now?
Also what if no one wants to buy at the price that was set, definitely the price would go down drastically. and if no one wanted to buy even after the order was placed, then the price would go down even more. till there will be no trade.

Bitcoin is just a decade old, and has done a $1trilliom market capitalization in the past which is proof of the potentiality of Bitcoin, compared to other assets in its class such as gold, even though gold has been in existence for several decades it it still doesn't match up to Bitcoin in all sense of it being an investment, although Bitcoin can still be regarded as a un matured investment due to it space of time in existence if comparing bitcoin to other assets like gold which have been seen and taken as a matured investments for several decades, this have been the only point we can point to that make gold to be above Bitcoin which is a time of existence of both assets.
All that will change in the coming years and Bitcoin will become a full flesh replacers of gold in it digital form and providing liqudities that will keep bitcoin investors at an advantage over other of it forks in that category.

I am ONLY talking about bitcoin.  Fuck shitcoins and the vague and non-specific idea of cryptocurrencies.. whatever that is supposed to mean.

If you do not make it clear that you are talking about bitcoin, then some people are going to think that you are talking about shitcoins, especially if you are mixing up your terms and making vague references to cryptocurriencies, in which an overwhelming majority (if not all of them) are either scams at worse or just deserve a presumption of being a scam, at best.

In other words, presume all projects that have its own coin/token that is not bitcoin to be a scam.... there might be some limited reasons to invest (or gamble with shitcoins), but hopefully it is less than 10% of the size of your bitcoin holdings that you would use to fuck around with any shitcoin.


That's true... even people who are in bitcoin might not really understand what bitcoin is, and surely shitcoiners are people involved in shitcoins/cryptocurrencies and those who use vague descriptions, such as "crypto" or "cryptocurrency" likely to not understand bitcoin enough in order to be more clear in their chosen language...and their chosen ways to make sure that they are being clear about bitcoin as compared to any reference(s) that they might want to make to shitcoins, if it is even relevant to the at-the-time discussion.


It does not hurt to talk about bitcoin from time to time and even mention it from time to time, even if many people who might be friends or relatives might not be interested in terms of hearing about bitcoin.. but sometimes, it might be helpful to mention bitcoin from time to time when it is relevant and even maybe saying.. bitcoin fixes this.. from time to time, as long as you are able to back up what you are saying in the even that they might ask any questions.


You may be caught up in Keynsian propagandistic ways of thinking in terms of believing that the money has to circulate in order to have value, but the fact of the matter is that Gresham's law is going to apply whether normies realize that they are doing it or not..... so people are going to tend to spend their least valuable money/assets prior to their more valuable assets/money, but it does not mean that they are not going to spend their bitcoin, especially if they have run out of other assets/money to spend and they need to eat or they need lodging or they want to have a new Iphone 15.

There are likely always going to be some people providing liquidity to the market, even if there might ONLY be 500k bitcoin circulating and 20.5 million in cold storage.... whatever circulating may well have to circulate a lot more... until the price goes up enough for the HODLers to decide to use it.. and yeah you are suggesting that there needs  to be incentives for sellers to even build infrastructure in order that someone will be able to sell their bitcoin in the event that they are wanting to sell their bitcoin.. ,so it won't do them any good if no one accepts bitcoin.. or there are no places to sell their bitcoin.


You make no sense Hewlet.

You seem to be talking about some kind of a shitcoin rather than bitcoin.

Sure you can hypothesize about extreme scenarios in which no one would want bitcoin and therefore the BTC price will go down, so even if what you are speculating about is possible it is not too likely to be the case, so why blabber out such nonsense as if bitcoin were some kind of a shitcoin when it is not.

Mostly likely you are typing such nonsense because you hardly have any clue in regards to what bitcoin is... so good luck with that.   Hopefully,  you bought some BTC just in case you are wrong about your fears of bitcoin's hypothesized downward spiral.

You sound a bit lost with your intermingling shitcoins into your discussion.

Maybe you want to reframe your question and try to focus on bitcoin, especially since this thread is about bitcoin.

Bitcoin is likely pretty close to inevitably going to continue to be volatile in the next 30 years, but surely if bitcoin's market cap continues to increase it will likely become less volatile with the passage of time.. but as you seem to hint 30 years is a long way to project out, so it does not have very much to do with the topic of this thread except maybe to the extent that your buying BTC (and even loading up on BTC) right now will give you a lot more options 20-30-40 years into the future, so maybe even slow accumulation now and in the next 4-10 years will then result in such BTC accumulating person to have a lot more options when it comes to 30 years down the road.. so long as s/he had not ended up losing the BTC along the way.. so one thing is accumulating BTC but another thing is actually making sure taht they are secure and periodically checking security and keeping up with the better ways to hold your BTC... whether that is going to change or not in the next 30 years seems to also be something that is hard to predict but seems likely since we are ONLY 14 years into bitcoin, as you mentioned.

Alright, man. It's quite simple. With $2000 in your bag, what you can purchase with that amount now will be higher than what you can purchase with it in the next five to seven years. Since the percentage of inflation gradually increases almost every year, it's more likely for you to increase your annual earning capacity. This way, you can slowly accumulate some amount of Bitcoin within 5 to 7 years, even if the price reaches $250k, using the Dollar-Cost Averaging approach.

I remember when people regretted not buying Bitcoin when the price was lower in 2014. But regardless, a lot of people are still buying now and holding, and even average individuals are investing in Bitcoin.

Yes, that's right, once the scarcity factor becomes bitcoin, the price will be even higher, especially with the bitcoin halving of course demand will increase. And the possibility of Bitcoin's price falling is quite low because its user base is very large and many are holding this bitcoin. The reason why the value of Bitcoin will continue to increase in the next few years is because the number of these bitcoins is limited. In addition, the widespread adoption of Bitcoin in several countries bodes well for Bitcoin's future.

So the smartest way to invest in bitcoin for us is to HODL and turn off your brain while the market does its thing. Or simply DCA into the portfolio every paycheck and throw in a little extra cash on big downturns. Most people make more money this way in the long run than by trading. However, it takes discipline.

DCA is a very well known strategy in the bitcoin investment world and it's easily used because the amount of risk involved is very small and every investor who has a small or huge capital can actually do because it very easy to carry out the only problem will be if the investor doesn't know what he or she is doing then actually yeild good results from the DCA strategy will be a problem.

There are so many investors that have planned to invest through DCA but have failed to meet up either by not properly planning it or going out of their plan and I think this is only problem that is faced with the DCA strategy.

There are still many people who know about Bitcoin but will refrain from investing in Bitcoin. They will be among the common penitents. Those who didn't buy Bitcoin before 2014 despite its dip now they regret. When the Bitcoin price reaches 250k it may be repeated that those who didn't buy Bitcoin before 2023. So this time should be utilized properly. By doing DCA, people of different income level can consider this small asset as an opportunity to gradually grow it into a large asset in the long term. For those who do not have sufficient money but can make some guess about the future of Bitcoin, applying DCA can be considered as an opportunity to grow the portfolio regularly and turn it into a long term asset.

Agreed and can attest to this. Faucets 8 years ago gave away some good amounts of bitcoins, like 1 bitcoin per click or so. It wasn't worth my time then but later regretted. Such an opportunity is rarely found now.  I wont be surprise that some set of persons still lack trust in Bitcoin regardless of how it has proven itself all these years. Because in 2014/2015 people never really believed in Bitcoin they dont believe how a digital currency could be outstanding and promise a revolutionary technology in it, they all felt its one of this internet scams then, but yet these people still trust the internet system.

There are good ways to accumulate Bitcoin, if such a person still lack trust or fear of investing now then h/she can buy some hardware, setup and start mining. Those who couldn't buy Bitcoin then should not miss their participation in accumulating now or might regret later for miss.