Iskander wins? C'mon dude, even in such poor quality video it's clearly visible that they missed. There was no direct hit from missile to Patriot. But if Russian propaganda isselling as a win, they can do it.
It's likely that some damage was made, but it doesn't looks that they destroyed it.

It is largely irrelevant - war is war and material and equipment is lost because that is exactly how  is supposed to happen. Regarding Iskander and Patriots, my guess is that is a numbers game, purely a question of statistics. There have been multiple videos of Ruzzian S-300 hit by a variety of missiles, and I guess it is not impossible that a Patriot launcher is hit - as simple as doing it while in transit, etc...

But if you want to brag about the air capabilities of Ruzzia, you may need to start explaining why Ukraine is hitting multi-billion facilities using simply unsophisticated drones. And it has not been a one-off, it has been over and over. If you wait another week, I will probably have another one for you to explain, etc...

Read up on imperialism and dump the conspiracy theories, and all will become crystal clear.

Russia is just doing the same thing they've been doing for the last 500 odd years.
Same thing, just the faces change that's all.

Russian troops have slowed down a lot, resources are scarce, as well as equipment. They'll be up by winter, I'm sure.

What's new there guys? Are the Russians stopped? I'm not really watching.

Problem is those "troops" are only good at killing unarmed civilians. A++++ star grade for that. Top of excellence. The crème de la crème. Pride of Russia.

However, when challenged against a real army, with weapons, the wheels quickly fall off.

Well, she said not much different thing that I posted - damaged Patriot. There is no talk about critical damaged. But in general, I wouldn't call Bezuhla as reliable source - she is spreading so much bullshit that sometimes looks that she works in favour of Russia.

Yup, war is war, such things happens. But I was talking just about this specific case, where Brank tried to sell it as Iskander win.

What makes you to think so?

'What the hell you wanna go fuck around with that Kursk region for?'

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4r9jLXvnKk



The reason I continue to favor (very strongly) the Russians is that while they took off the ridiculously soft kid-gloves a while ago, they continue to demonstrate a high degree of military professionalism in the overall conduct of this thing.  I have seen credible evidence of isolated war crimes by Russian forces on the battlefield.  The question is, how are these handled within the military?  I lack the visibility to know, and have no contacts who would.

Maybe the individual Russian soldiers who commit war crimes on the ground, or officers who do targeting in a criminal manner, are given honorable discharges and turned loose among the Russian people...like SPC Green https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmudiyah_rape_and_killings was from the U.S. military?  I cannot rule it out, but my current perception of Putin's military leads me to believe that it isn't the standard operating procedure.

Russia is currently fighting in regions of Ukraine where the population supports them fairly strongly.  That's probably part of the reason why they are mopping the floor with the ZioNazis...and, unfortunately, their hapless conscripts as well.  I would not expect the professionalism displayed by the Russians to persist when the front-lines move across the Dnieper.

Strawman argument + whataboutism.

When you combine all the Internet websites that show the number of deaths and injured in this war, it's over a million.

Russian aggression is at the forefront because the media doesn't show how sneaky the West has been in promoting the aggression FIRST.

If the US had not started the war in 2014 by pressuring Ukraine to do it, and if they had not funded the war throughout this whole time, there would be over a million troops that would not be troops, and could be at home for joy in this coming Christmas.