it turns challenges from something fun into a system where whoever makes more trades has a greater chance of winning. It would be more enjoyable if there were two competitions, one for traders and another with simple tasks where luck determines the winner, or alternate between the two.

---

I've given this topic a bump, let's see how long it will remain first.

I think that such lotteries are wrong, and the number of slots per participant should be limited.
The bonus should be received by those who use the project for exchange, and not by those who use the project for a guaranteed win.

Even you don't have a count and immediately say you won't make a profit. Use your common sense before posting.

---

If it's restricted, would you like to see the other lottery that is also posted by inspace here, although not restricted there are still very few participants.

Then why do you yourself, never take that slot? even CCECash has done it a few times, as a reminder inspace already posts it in this Thread every time there is a lottery.

This is not a raffle that does not involve fees, which should be limited. Unless raffles such as guess Price or guess the new score should be restricted.
If this kind of raffles are restricted, we will see fewer enthusiasts and it will probably take days to fill slots.

Thanks for the explanation man, next time I'll try to do that, it's not urgent and can be bypassed using a browser like Brave or Firefox.

From a marketing standpoint, it seems to be working, look at all the fokls, almost an entire page talking about these contests (and it's not the first time, lol), keeping the ANN topic frequently at the top of discussions (since I'm not a marketing expert, I don't know if these conversations have positive effects and bring more customers to ccecash).

But I put myself in your shoes and imagine it might not be cool to spend almost an entire page reading about the same subject. Most people who follow  this ANN like to see new things and more exciting topics, so to speak.

I hope to beat @AakZaki in the next raffle. 

🎉 The series of events continues! The latest raffle has just started — hurry up and secure your slot!

♻️ CCE.Cash 🎀 SWAP RAFFLE 🎀 $30 in BTC

➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ Publish proof - for every $100 exchanged, you receive 1 slot.



♻️ Stay tuned for the latest news.

Friends, the new tweet is already here! We'd love to hear from you!


With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

There's nothing wrong in such type of raffles, the ones who take more slots will have higher chance of winning and if someone is capable to occupy more slots by trading at the exchange then what's wrong in such approach?

Most members who apply in the raffle already use the exchange and if they win something by doing high value trades then there's nothing wrong in that approach I guess and that's why there are no such rules to limit a member who participate in such raffle.

Yes, that's true, the ones who take one slot will always have same chance of either winning or losing even if rest of the 29 or in case of these raffles 49 spots are occupied by someone else. I believe the ones who put effort and trade $5k worth to occupy most slots deserve that because they haven't broken any rules, and it's their right to take the slots because they've traded $5k for that.

If there was a limit of no more than 5 or 7 slots per person, then the participant would have a better chance.

Forum member knuckey took 48 slots, although he could have taken 50
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5578967

Sr. Member knuckey took 48 slots, although he could have taken 50. Another participant still has a 4% chance of winning