@MaNI, so if you consider yourself as part of the whole team. What's your opinion about the community members that feel like they are ignored and held back by the dev team?
I cannot speak about incidences that have happened before I have joined, however quite honestly I feel that the current complaints are completely unfounded for the most part, at least from the most vocal people, there may be less vocal people who have legitimate concerns but I wouldn't know as I have not heard from them.
I think that these people are still reacting based on things that have happened in the past, and not on what is happening now, I ask these people to let go of the past and focus on the present.
In this particular instance, an offer was made to the community at large, the overwhelming majority accepted it, one or two people did not.
One in particular (LTex) was very loud and vocal about it, and made a counter offer - the counter offer would have involved (a) Doing multiple things in a way that LTex prescribed (b) Taking money from only one person, something that is (at least in my opinion) far more prone to corruption as it lends power and influence to that individual.
Faced with the choice of going with the original plan - which the community at large accepted and was happy to fund with an overwhelmingly fast response - or going with a less desirable plan that came with various terms we were not happy with we took the first - this seems to me reasonable. Roel, on behalf of the team tried to address LTex's concerns on the forum as much as reasonable, however the team cannot and will not be beholden to a small minority of the community, no decision of any importance will ever have 100% backing of everybody.
I can assure you that had the response from the *community at large* been negative and not so overwhelmingly positive, then it would have been a completely different story.
How do you as a team plan to improve that? The discussion about IPO for the iOS app is just one example, the problem is (and long time has been) bigger than that.
I'm sure we will continue to discuss as a team what we can improve and where as well as continuing to take pointers from the community at large. However, and this is important, for any decision there will always be people who do *not* get there way, and we simply cannot control how those people feel or react to this.
And don't use the open source of the wallet as an excuse for guarantee that everything will be fine, you should know better that that is a false excuse.
I know no such thing. Nobody can 'own' open source code, especially if they are not even the people working on it.
Ask Oracle how 'owning' OpenOffice or various other open source products worked out for them, the second they bought it the developers all fled, eventually out of desperation they gave OpenOffice away to Apache but still it is a has been with a completely new fork LibreOffice rising in its place.
MaNi, I never tried to dictate my opinion on this IPO in any way. I only argued I had concerns about the path chosen and offered an alternative. Both the concerns and the alternative have been ignored completely by the dev team (you take part in and are rightfully trying to defend here). I have tried again and again to get a decent conversation going on this, to me, important step.
It's absolutely untrue that I have tried to manipulate the outcome of any democratic process here. That would be impossible for there has never been any democratic process! My later offer to privately help Roel and Patrick out to fund their BV (Limited) has nothing to do with my rightful doubts about the decision to use that BV for the OIS wallets. I just wanted to offer my donation to help them out to become more professional then they already were. But in all fairness, I surely would have liked to at least get a decent answer to my serious questions. It was totally founded and respectful until the total ignorance of your dev team became shameless!
And one person donating (not eating up premine) funds to help Gulden get forward is bad? I haven't asked for shares or any other compensation, I just wanted to help things move on fast without any obstacles.
You talk about community at large funding and approving this, but can you support that with figures? Because by my counts only 5 persons were involved in this IPO. If that represents the majority of your community, I must be posting in the wrong thread here
