This is the kind of move that sets a real example. It’s one thing to talk about Bitcoin, but actually choosing to be paid in it shows real belief in the system. Tashiro’s decision might seem small, but it could inspire others to think differently not just CEOs, but regular people too. And from my viewpoint it’s also beneficial, so why not.

And it should be regulated, in this case - and you probably would have less BTC than you could of by the same amount put through buying BTC at all.

Would we even know where his BTC would go afterward?

We probably never would know that for sure...

We'll never know if the CEO immediately sold his Bitcoin after receiving it in his wallet. However, this move demonstrates that, as a leader, he accepts Bitcoin directly as payment for his salary. This indirectly shows his employees and the public that Bitcoin is a valuable asset that can be used as a means of payment. Whether he was simply seeking publicity or not, we don't know for sure, but his actions are a positive step in promoting Bitcoin to a wider range of people

Doesnt matter on what are their intents since from the start on why they had made out such step specially in the talks about accepting Bitcoin as your salary but cant be able to deny that when it comes into that known very common reason on why people tend to deal up with it just because of the potential profits that it could give out when the time comes but of course not all people would be that wary or being that too sensible about into the possibilities of losing up the amount too and thats why some people cant be able to bare up with the risks involved into it and would be that wanting to stick up with those traditional ones and wont be trying out to deal up or handle up crypto or Bitcoin itself when it comes into their salary or whatever possible engagement that they could be able to deal on with. In general, having these kind of news always turned out to be that good or positive because this do pertains about adoption and recognition.

It is just that people cant be able to avoid not to think about those hidden intents but actually we are all that sharing up the same target with it on which we are here to make money or profits on long term approach.
It doesnt matter on what or which ways that we are that dealing into on which its none other business on whatever the decisions that we are that taking.

It could be that the CEO is receiving a salary in bitcoins partly for his long-term profit and partly for his living... We are just speculating here.

Takashi may have believed that receiving a salary in bitcoin would be better and if kept longer it would continue to increase than fiat, he may be a longtime bitcoin investor so agreed to receive a salary in BTC.

Maybe only a few people receive salaries (BTC) from large companies, because we know most of them remain fiat which many companies use to pay their salaries.

He must have thought of it, how is every company wanting to hold bitcoin and he has the opportunity to do same using his salary, maybe he thought this way and decided to use bitcoin to receive his salary to keep stacking up bitcoin. With this he wouldn't be finding it hard to accumulate as he will just be holding his salary instead, with this good move I don't think he would even be thinking of selling now as he must want to be in profit with his salary, it's the best move any CEO could do, must of the well known companies buying bitcoin don't really want bitcoin but as for the company it will help generate more money in future that's the only reason they are there.

The proposal is interesting, but I don't think it's feasible to receive my monthly salary in BTC. Even with the cryptocurrency's continued appreciation, it still experiences high volatility, which is much more influenced by external factors than fiat currency.

I provide translation services, and I receive a good portion in BTC/ETH, with most preferring to pay in USDT. I generally use these payments for daily expenses (it's my "salary," after all); in practice, I can't keep much of what I receive. So, in the end, what's the advantage for the recipient, since it's more worthwhile to keep than to spend?

In this case, I think it's better to receive in fiat currency and invest in Bitcoin or another worthwhile cryptocurrency.

Why are only the CEOs receiving their salary to be paid in bitcoin and not the workers in general, I personally think this is biased and cheating on the workers entirely, the opinion would been open for everyone as an option to choose the preferred means of receiving payment, Fiat or Bitcoin.

They are definitely the first CEO to start receiving payment in Bitcoin in Japan, at least they start history.