This is a very good initiative that will work for Bitcoin and for the increase in the price of Bitcoin. The initiative that the CEO is taking seems to be very experienced about Bitcoin and he has probably invested in Bitcoin. The CEO of a company has a lot of money, his money has no end, he can convert his money into Bitcoin if he wants and hold it for a long time, but in an organization there are different classes of people like rich, middle class and poor. The rich may not have any problem with their salary because if they keep their salary in Bitcoin, they can keep it in Bitcoin because they may not need that salary very much and may not have to sell it immediately because they can hold their Bitcoin for a long time, but the middle class and the poor will have to sell Bitcoin if the price increases to pay their salary and if the price decreases a little, their salary will decrease in the main part and they will have to wait until the price normalizes.  However, there will be many advantages in terms of transactions because the transactions will be very fast and there will be no risk to the money.

You have same thoughts process  like me. Instead of treating bitcoin as a currency to spend on a regular basis, I rather hold it to grow on value. Due to the volatility that bitcoin market comes with, it has become almost impossible to use it like the fiat in buying your daily goods and services. Bitcoin is already a highly valued digital currency that has been performing quite awesomely over the years now, so I don't expect it to take a new direction now, I.e, as strong as the gold bar in the market, yet the gold bar isn't used for everyday transactions too.

OP: It is in a certain way positive, ofc, but let's say that the news is that an ordinary person does it, I think that the news of a CEO taking his income or salary in bitcoin, is burned news,so, the focus today is on ordinary people, imo, and that is happening, still at a very slow pace, but that is the real debate today, or better to say, the "new" news.

when it comes to receiving payment that comes in the form of salary in bitcoin, regardless of bullish you are about bitcoin, if you are do not have alternative funds somewhere else that stands as a backup to your salary, you don't have a choice than always converting it to cash immediately you are being paid. for the CEO, it is most likely that he is earning a decent amount that is enough to carter for most of his needs even without selling off his salary that is being paid in bitcoin. if instead of that everything he is earning is directly coming in through bitcoin, then there is no just way that he will not sell off his holding.
 

When most companies shy away from the practical implementation of a decentralized financial system and buy Bitcoin only as a profitable asset, it undermines the original purpose of Bitcoin and is counterproductive to increasing people's credibility and acceptance. But even in such a situation, when a CEO starts using Bitcoin personally, especially for important matters like receiving a salary, it sends a strong message that "Bitcoin is not just for holding, but also for using". Takashi Tashiro's move seems very positive to us and this bold initiative can play a significant role in the crypto world. Takashi Tashiro's name will be at the forefront of the brave in the real progress of Bitcoin. So let's use Bitcoin not only on the valence sheet but also in real life to improve the modern and digital economic blockchain system.

Their company should give different options for their employees to decide what payment methods they want to have and if they want Bitcoin, it can be 100% salary paid in bitcoin or something else. Just like 50% in bitcoin, 50% in fiat currency or any other percentages that are decided by employees. The company and financial team only are responsible to proceed salary payments to employees based on chosen payment methods and percentages.

Employees know what they have, and what they need, so they can choose a best salary payment method for them as well as which percentage of bitcoin in total salary they receive from the company.

That would be nice, and yeah, there wouldn't be a need to convert everybody to BTC right away - it could be started just from those who want and partially..

If you don't have to buy bitcoins, you will not have to pay for trading fee, withdrawal fee from centralized exchanges or price difference from in-person trades. So theoretically it is very good to receive bitcoin directly from your company and it is more helpful if they allow you to provide them a receiving address from your non-custodial wallet.

Above are advantages, but there are also disadvantages that certainly affect you if you don't have reserved fund to use and still need to use your monthly salary payment. If you have such need, you will have to sell your bitcoin, and it costs you on-chain transaction fee, trading fee but more possible important thing is volatile price change of Bitcoin.

I respect such a CEO. If you want to promote Bitcoin, you must first believe in it. People won't believe what you say about Bitcoin if you refuse to receive your salary in Bitcoin.

If we assume that the CEO of this company refuses to receive his salary in Bitcoin, how will employees believe in the option of receiving his salary in Bitcoin? How will shareholders believe in Bitcoin?

This is the kind of leader I admire. I don't like the leader who enthusiastically calls his soldiers to battle and then hides behind trees. A true leader is one who leads his soldiers into battle, and then they will believe in him.

Because there is reason behind this. The reason they pay CEO in BTC is not just to create a trend of paying salaries in bitcoin, that is not the main purpose. Remixpoint's primary goal is to establish its brand, attract the attention of the media and the global cryptocurrency community. The second reason is internal strategy, paying the CEO in bitcoin to commit and align the interests between shareholders and the company, increasing shareholders' confidence in the company's strategy. Because the company's stock price is closely correlated with bitcoin.

They never mentioned the idea of ​​employees or the entire company being paid in bitcoin. It's not bias, they clearly do it for their own benefit, not for the popularity or future of bitcoin.