I am thinking for those who wants to hold bitcoin, this is the perfect opportunity to acquire bitcoin without having to buy it on your own. Lessens the steps to be taken but I see your point because after all, you would not be using all your salary to buy bitcoin so at least half has got to be converted to fiat.
They don't have to directly buy bitcoins but receiving it from their companies in salary. It saves time, trading and withdrawal fees on exchanges as well as gives them very good tool to do Dollar Cost Averaging for their Bitcoin investment. They don't have to find good prices for entries but just simply accumulate more bitcoins each week or month when salary payment is proceeded by their companies.
If I remember correctly, you once gave this spending formula in this order: Necessary expenses→Emergency fund→Savings→Investments. This is a great spending formula, we need to prioritize more important things first. But when you accept bitcoin payments, you are doing the opposite of your own ideals.
When receiving salary from companies, people can have to do this financial management too. Depends on their contracts and agreements in payment processing with their companies, they will need to have different proper strategies on financial management. They must do it well enough for achieving effortless investment in Bitcoin and oppositely with bad management, their investment will be dangerous.
That move shows that the CEO supports Bitcoin and wants them to know that he's also ready to receive it as payment. Such a moveeven if the CEO wants to make a conversion by selling the Bitcoinhe will think twice because the wallet will be under watch since the wallet will be sent to the financial team to drop the payment, but that's all the decision of the CEO to make, as the money belongs to him.
The CEO can be a role model for many workers, staffs in that company but the rich and the poor will have different finance and management of their finance and life. I believe that the CEO only gave a chance for his workers and staffs, and the remaining task belongs to those people. Whether they are able to take advantage of this policy, it depends on themselves, not the CEO.