That sounds interesting, never heard about that. I remember the time they sent that robot up one of the airshafts in a pyramid. It reached a dead end, with copper rods sticking out the blocking stone and they drilled through.
Oh, and don't mention carbon dating with BADecker in the room. Epic sore subject.

I don't see the difference between people that believe in God and those that are so proud of their faith in science.

One group of people trust Holy men to read tea leaves-- ponder and meet one with another and share their insights-- create holy script that lays forth the foundation and framework for mankind's moral and ethical dilemmas.

The other group of people believe in God. What is the difference?

"Created by chance" is a contradiction.  "Created" is causal, "random" is acausal.

To stay consistent in your assertion would require "randomness" to be defined in terms of a concrete, causal probability function of randomness.  This removes any internal inconsistency in the claim.

Think about this one for a moment: the only thing giving the government "the right to do anything" is the people's ignorance; that is to say, the people are ignorant of the Bible's true message regarding LAW, and they do not read law dictionaries.

Similarly, it is ignorance that prevents one from seeing the truth about God and our genetics.

Seems to me when it boils down to it, that since the universe is mental, then we are nothing but mere thought.. made of a rib? No. Of star's? No, but we live on one.. Science is NOT a faith, it is a tool that can be used to reach general consensus that something either is, or is not. I do not need faith to work with science, I need intelligence to figure the yet unknown. If I could prove god, would you accept it? BADecker fails to realise his book is a book of allegory, a book designed to make you believe in something from nothing. We are taught you cant get something from nothing. Me, I look at the rain, and say, um.. ? If I had proof, would you want it? No, because like BADecker, some have been alive too long to move from that single tracked brain they show the world they are stuck on.

You'd think for a minute, that it would take a scientist to prove god, because folks like BADecker would tarnish whatever evidence so as to suit his needs. It cannot take a BADecker to prove god, since shite is not considered as proof.

Ironically, for scientific proof of god, we need scientifically minded (in BADeckers opinion, athiest's) people, not brainwashed fools.

Someone please drop a postit in BADeckers inbox which reads:

The bible is not SCIENTIFIC PROOF.

Argue anything else, but this fact remains the same.

See? The universe is mental.

There are three parts to being a human, physical, yeah, we're here, astral, yup, we are 'apparently' made of stars, and mental. We thought ourselve's here. And here we are. Your earliest memory is of you constructing your body inside another universe, that being your mother. When you first saw the light, you were being born. between born and 3, you were more astral and mental whilst your body adapted to take on board these other two passengers. Where are you in all this? YOU dont exist as a single entity. And never will.

Away get laid you, surely it's gotta be better than arguing from a book that, by your definition, is the ONLY evidence?

Care to explain your god without using anything the bible has to offer, or any work's by other people?

What, you dont have the power of creation at your finger tip's?

Must be me

The Bible absolutely is not scientific proof for God!

Proof, no matter what it may be, is a judgmental thing. It is a personal thing. One can be confronted with all the evidence of the whole universe, scientific evidence and otherwise, and still not accept it as proof.

The reason that certain people are all upset with me (as shown by their comments and posts) since I started pushing the stuff listed here https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is, people are generally reasonably honest. (The reason for their general honesty is another topic.) My reasoning is hitting too close to their honesty. They are starting to convince themselves, from the evidence, that God actually might be real after all. And nobody likes being wrong, especially when it is himself/herself that is telling them that they are wrong.

Science, that is, the accumulation and organization of knowledge, is showing more and more that God exists - https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. The funny thing that is happening as this continues is, God is becoming more of scientific reality, and less of religion.

The problem for religious people when this happens is, they don't have as much room for faith, because the faith space in their minds and souls is taken up by knowing and knowledge - science. Yet God, Himself, says in the Bible (and most of the gods of the other religions indicate or say the same) that you must live by faith.

Too much of the knowledge about God can actually destroy faith... destroy the person who holds the knowledge.

Faith in "science" and faith in God are merging into reality.