I know, I know. You just simply need to express something. But why here? You could start your own thread, you know. Oh that's right. Nobody would ever look at it if you did that.

Since you can't seem to get on-topic, like with info similar to what is listed here https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what's the use of even reading your stuff, even on the off-chance that you did stay on-topic one time?

1) BADecker admits that he is cruelly retarding the human race in its search for the God of Light and Love which Messengers of all time (like Emmanuel/Jesus) have described!

2) The proof of God will come from within for God dwells within the temple that IS YOU.


You don't need to read "my" stuff since apparently we are already in agreement! You have agreed with me on point number one:

Are you retarded? Do you have Alzheimers where you forget everything you read? Are you trolling? So then how can you not see that there has been a mountain of information/evidence against your beliefs, yet you continue to ignore them and trout your nonsensical, illogical beliefs as correct?

Sorry if it sounds harsh, but you are the absolute dumbest person I've ever met on the internet.

Are you trolling? Are you simply ignorant? Can't you see that simply saying that there is a mountain of evidence without showing the evidence doesn't mean that there is necessarily any evidence at all?

Perhaps you have evidence that refutes the universe full of evidence shown at https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. As Mr. Universe said in Serenity, "No problem; Bring it on; Bring it on; Bring it on. From here to the eyes and ears of the 'verse. That's my motto, or, might be, if I started having a motto."

You like posting that link don't you. Here, I'll refute all of the nonsensical claims you make there. First off, I'll disprove the bible and since I'm lazy and you're too stupid, I'll repost quotes of paragraphs I previously typed to you in response to your nonsensical bullcrap.

1) The earth is much older than 6,000 years ago. The very Genesis portion of the bible is incorrect, as the Gregorian Calendar came around in the 1500s(500 years ago), and the bible was supposedly written close to 2,000 years ago. This means that the text saying God created the world in 6 days, is wrong, because there were no 24 hour days back then when the bible was written. The entire Genesis portion of the bible is believed to be symbolic by even fellow christian scholars. Either symbolic or edited(It's obviously fake). So your arguement of the earth being 6,000 years old BADecker is wrong. Go do your research.

2) In this link, https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you talk about Cause and Effect, of which you are again, wrong. On a subatomic level, particles are known to react differently. For example, cause can follow effect instead of effect following cause. Also, as I told you before, a new quantum theory supports the idea that the universe is Eternal, meaning it never had a beginning and will never have an end. The Big Bang theory is inherently flawed, so again, there goes your chance of saying the universe was even created by God in the first place, for if this theory is even marginally "correct", then you might as well throw your bible out the window cause everything there is inherently wrong.

3) Homosexuality has been found and recorded in over 500 species, with our closest relatives(such as Bonobos, etc) displaying a large array of homosexual behavior. Studies since the 1960s during Kinsey's time have shown that males are indeed born homosexual, as even straight males when subjected to erotic homosexual porn, were not "turned on" and vice versa, indicating that homosexuality in males in determined prior to birth and cannot be changed. Studies done on female sexuality show that women have a "flexible sexuality", as shown by Dr Meredith Chivers, women have been equally attracted to males and other women, even those who self identified as straight or lesbian, were still aroused at both sexes in erotic positions i.e erect penis, naked women's body, etc. Homosexuality is 100% natural as Heterosexuality, and btw, if you went to school, you'd know that sex is not for 1 thing only(The making of babies), it's not. If that was so, then women who have went through menopause would also be a crime in your book, since they can't make children naturally anymore. That would mean that your mother, grandma, practically every woman above age 50 is going to hell for having lived to age 50 and not being able to make children through sex anymore. Nice logic BADecker.

4) The bible has been edited, have passages taken in, taken out, since the early christian era right after Christ's supposed assention into Heaven. The romans have edited the bible, the monarchs of England have edited the bible, and the Church has edited the bible, numerous times.

5) The bible displays some of the most hideous and appaling things in all "holy books". The god of the bible promotes the killing of innocent people and animals, the raping of female children and women, and the general destruction of humankind. Feel free to throgoughly scan through your own bible and witness the atrocities in it, commanded by your "God".

You know what, I'll post you a little of the pure evil promoted by the christian God:

Heres a website that shows you the many horrors commanded by God in the bible, feel free to double check in your own bible: http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.html

The christian god simply does not exist. Every, single, one of your bullshit claims has been refuted many, many times over throughout the course of this thread. Also, it'd do you well to not cherrypick and "interpret"/basically lie about what's said in the bible. You can't say things like, "these laws were intended for the Israelites only"...I thought the bible was created by god? So then why is he including the promotion of murder and etc that were intended for the Israelites at the time, in a book that's supposedly meant to be for "all times"? Oh yea, cause he doesn't exist.

Hi BADecker,

Check this out; simple instructions on finding the evidence that I have posted:



If you have any interest, you can check out my posts by looking at them on my profile; I mainly post in this thread nowadays.


BADecker, you had posted that you were mainly talking about the Christian God of the Bible. Now I am confronting you on your claim that there is a God of the Bible (ONE BEING--God of Light and Love) who is also a God of wrath. I do not think that you have proven or even evidenced such a god as you claim because wrath and love is a contradiction. I am qualifying the type of god that is available to be proven; could you kindly explain why God would show wrath if He is in fact God of Love?

"The faulty thinking in this idea lies in the fact that the point in your statement was caused to exist that way (if indeed it is actually the truth). In other words, cause caused the effect of effects preceding causes in some parts of the subatomic structure. Because of this, at best, there is a stalemate in using cause and effect to prove the existence of God.", this entire statement you just made shows just how dumb you really are. That made no sense. The behavior of particles that are unseen to the naked eye can't be compared to my actions, do you even think about what you write?...Besides that, you've contradicted yourself which goes to show how really clueless you are, since in your link you made it out to be that you believed cause and effect was a proof for God, now you're saying it isn't and that it's effectively a "stalemate". Nice one.

And you've said nothing to counter anything I've said, not that I blame you, since the things said can't be countered. Nice to see you post that faulty link to illogical, nonsensical "information". Damn you're dumb, I'm not even gonna hold back the feelings of sheer shamefulness and irritation replying to someone as illogical like yourself.

What you've said, "If causes truly come before effects in some actions of subatomic particles, and if it is simply not a dimensional misinterpretation of cause and effect, what is the cause that caused/causes the subatomic particles to act backwards regarding cause and effect... so that the backwards action of subatomic particles is the effect?"  made no sense, again. Please read up on what I'm talking about before responding with illogical bullcrap, thanks...

http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/self-accelerating-particles-0120

Everything in your link has been refuted. Scroll up, it's funny that you continue to deny that you have don't have a clue what you're talking about. Everything you've said can be refuted by a 5th grader, you're That dumb. You've actually contradicted yourself numerous times, if you bothered to think before you type you might have not, but oh well, you're That dumb. I should really just unpin this thread from the "Show new replies to your posts" list, because you're downright stupidity is just too irritating. When you go to school and get an education, or simply google these basic things up, or even just read your own bible(Because I know you haven't) and see the horrible inconsistencies presented in there, and appalling contradictions present, then speak to me. As the fictional character Red Forman would say, " You're a dumbass".

I really hope someone else is seeing just how dumb, inconsistent, and contradictive you are. This is what you said a few messages up:
Now you're saying, " Since you are unwilling or unable to bring up points that refute the existence of God in the light of the things found here https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, and since you are only willing to SAY that you have refuted the existence of God, and since you try to prove the non-existence of God with all kinds of things that only talk about God in a light that He has been proven to exist... ", so there you previously made the claim yourself that the things you posted may arguebaly be false or true. Now you're saying with certainty that you think they're true.

You just contradicted yourself, for the 9,999th time. Also, as I've said a million times, I've refuted every one of your "statements" about the legitimacy of the existence of the christian god(He doesn't exist), scroll up. You sir, are a dumbass. Honestly, it's hard to differentiate whether you're trolling or just that stupid.

Also, did you even read the link lol?, http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/self-accelerating-particles-0120, the particles are experiencing the effect before the cause, therefore "nothing" is "causing" them to accelerate. You're like a child arguing  that 5+5 is 55 and not 10.

"Let's say that the info in the link is 100% true. There is a backward action among some subatomic actions. This backward action is that the effect happens before the cause. I am simply giving it a name when I call it a backward action. Let's even call it by a more formalized name. Let's call it Subatomic Backward Action. We could name it anything that we wanted. But, humor me in this that I named it "Subatomic Backward Action."

"Now here is the question. What causes Subatomic Backward Action to exist? Subatomic Backward Action is itself an effect of some cause. Perhaps the cause is the particle accelerator manipulation of the subatomic particles. Whatever it is, something causes them to act this way, a backward way, a way we named Subatomic Backward Action."

Just as you incorrectly, previously stated that Atheism was a religion, so are you incorrectly stating this also., " Now here is the question. What causes Subatomic Backward Action to exist? Subatomic Backward Action is itself an effect of some cause. Perhaps the cause is the particle accelerator manipulation of the subatomic particles. Whatever it is, something causes them to act this way, a backward way, a way we named Subatomic Backward Action.". In that quote you said that something must "cause" it to act that way, when in actuality, effect came before cause, and you also said you didn't read the article, so then who are you to even type on the matter, when you have No Clue about the subject?.

"Cause and effect is still in play, and in correct order". Do you see how dumb you are now? I stated that the effect came before the cause, yet you're insisting that cause still comes into play, which isn't true. And what's even worse, is that you're saying that, " Cause and effect is still in play, and in correct order", when the exact opposite is true. Effect can come before Cause, and not in a linear order.

Is anyone else reading this? Please tell me someone else is reading this. This guy is just too frigging stupid.