I have an even better faith than your god's BADecker.. I did'nt just hack your bible to shred's, folks want a new, more secure book, one that force's NOTHING, lest I come get it, just to destroy it, so I can rebuild it again, to rub your nose in it.. please, if all life was extinct whilst noah sailed, how did he get TWO Sequoia tree's on his boat?

Edit: You realise, of course, he did'nt. because america was'nt discovered until columbus.. me, I dont believe this, but by definition of your claim'(s), this is what actually happened.. not..

Come on BADecker, bow to Sequoia!!

What will you say when scientists look at Pinus longaeva when it dies, and there is NO proof of any flood previous to it's currently 5064 year old life?

Nowt, cause you know not to.

Oi, BADecker.. not speaking anymore?

To scared to admit I got ya?

By the baws, baw bag, now screeeeeeeam for your god.. you fuckin need him now huh?

Just out of curiosity, how come I dont believe in god, but by your definition, he helped me to defeat those false prophet's like you?

No? I guess your away picking on weaker, more gullable fools.. people that dont know not to get you started. Please, someone write to the vatican for an explanation of these tree's that are alive today, yet older than the oldest biblical personage..

BADecker, your credibility is now officially absolute 0.. all you do now is look a bigger fool than you did a second ago, and continue to do so. Why?

Lack of evidence.

It's not you I feel sorry for.. it's the billions that will suffer due to YOUR ignorance of the FACT's around you, keeping in mind, you are all in it together yeah?


More proof of life: http://www.livescience.com/41191-ancient-microbe-fossils-found.html

3.5 BILLION years old.. please, die very FUCKIN QUICK.

Well? People avoid talking about all kinds of things all the time. There isn't enough time in one's life to talk about half of the things that one could talk about. Trees are nice.

Keep in mind that he spent about 10 posts rejecting the idea that the fallacy of induction also applies to him, and then I find out that he thinks I'm talking about fucking electrical superconductors.

Yes but, the proof for the existence of God can be found at https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, induction or no induction. Wanna talk induction? Why not start an induction thread? The proof at the link is dynamic proof. It doesn't have anything to do with induction. A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.

Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

How many times have your posted your false proof link? Must be around 20 times now. You got a bee in your bonnet over something. That isn't normal behaviour is it.

Lol make a thread about induction?

By citing evidence as certain proof, you are using inductive reasoning.  Inductive reasoning *by definition* cannot possibly yield certain proof.  How can you not understand this simple sentence?  You can't inductively conclude God exists because inductive reasoning doesn't allow you to.  It's.  Not.  Possible.

You could have 1,000,000 pages of evidence, or 1,000,000,000, or even 1,000,000,000,000...and it would still be impossible.

People keep asking the question about proof for God. Which would you rather have? My link? Or the whole post? It's is up to you to click the link or not, or accept the proof or not.