Your skunk miner was so easy to compile in windows. so many users here did it, including me.
You will find here hundreds of sincere guys who can do that for you.

Does these people know what xevan algo coins have very shall hashrate? 200+ pcs gpus like gtx 1070 and profit almost gone

There are always people willing to compile something for Windows if you post it. He's currently getting his bounty out of Xevan and then can release it for the .5 bounty. Either way, once it's released it wont earn more then all the other algos at the moment. Too public, too popular, the new kids still don't know how difficulty works. Only reason it looks more profitable (and not by that much) is because one person is currently mining it.

Krlnx knows this and that's why he publicly announced it. It's no longer that profitable and he probably can scoop up quite a bit more from private offers in PMs.


Epsylon doesn't make ground up miners AFAIK. I've tried contacting multiple developers to get private miners made and most wont even talk about it despite willing to compensate them quite well. It's actually pretty ludicrous. You'd think Cryptos would have attracted a lot more talent then they have as far as programming goes.

Not sure what this means? There aren't developers because there is someone willing to pay more? You don't even know what 'more' is in this situation.

You don't know how much I'm paying. Despite leaving open ended amounts to those I wish to employ they don't even look to do business with you.

Mister Pruvot, I have a request for ccminer:please add a second benchmark mode -precise when I not use -a switch with benchmark and miner makes benchmarks for all algirithms in a bunch

For now benchmark mode is making a few seconds measurements and some are inaccurate (for example tribus benchark shows 20Mh, but with switch -a tribus it shows 40Mh). With this mode miner could in addition make power measurement for each algorithm during the test - we know, that some of algorithms are less power hungry and that measurement could help to better calculate profit. Now with those 2-5 seconds measurements when I try to observe power on GPU-Z it is imposible because when GPU-Z shows power, miner is going to switch to another algo.
That change should not be hard to do, but it should make benchmarking a lot easier and accurate.
My vision:

I don't quite get you... Actually any algo with large miners, surely the profit will be lesser...

Epsylon3,
If i need to start from a random extranonce2.......... should i just change in this line in ccminer.cpp
as    i = rand();   
or any other file change needed ?

Why must it be random? Regardless, your proposed change is way off base.
Take a look at util.cpp:stratum_notify for the start value.

bitcore trouble @ yiimp again...