Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Smells like crap(to).

A controversial opinion in VERY broad strokes:

POTUS is gearing up to drop taxes (maybe to zero) on couples earning less than $200K.
Who usually has de minimis taxes? Answer: poor people.

To me, this indicates, as incredible as this thought is, that you would need to earn >$200K/year as a family to be "not poor" soon.
Where is bitcoin when this happens: perhaps no less than $300k/btc or even more.

Conclusion...if you cannot make sure that you are earning >$200k/year within the next 12-24mo, buy bitcoin as much as you can, perhaps. Albeit, this is not an investment advice.

We are in the middle of a gigantic experiment: a vast decrease in all taxes on the current middle class (except sales taxes) with simultaneous increase in sales taxes plus a presumed significant decrease in government assistance: medicaid, Section 8, etc, etc.

EDIT: DXY had peaked at 110 in jan. Now, it's at 99.25 (10% decrease). In 2008 and 2011, DXY bottomed at about 71-72. It's entirely possible that this is where we are going aka another 25-30% down, which should be super bullish for btc.
W.Buffett hinted that Berkshire would think of diversifying their $$ to other currencies.

With all the OP_return talk around the community, I have to wonder a bit if developers aren’t trying to recreate the Bitcoin Cash fork as a dividend for Bitcoin holders to help pump the price like in 2017. Sounds crazy and it probably is, but maybe certain core developers are just pretending to be dishonest and incompetent right now to help a possible fork materialize to pump the market with free airdropped money?

I'm pretty sure that the vast majority of couples of every western (or, indeed, any) European country would be classified as "poor" by the above definition.

FOMC Meeting

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

You talk about NOW, not 12-24 mo in the future.
You have to skate where the "puck" will be, not where it is right now (some hockey great said it, maybe Gretzky).

The gist is in what you cut off  

You are certainly not poor now earning $200K/year, perhaps upper middle class.

However, POTUS thinks that you would be, and pretty soon, hence the need for no taxes on EVERYONE below 150-200K (depends on the day he or Lutnick talks about it).
Indeed, if $ drops 30% plus tariffs PLUS sales tax and voila..200K/year is not enough.
Phil was saying already that in NY area, you need 175K/year to be middle class..I hear the same about some places in CA.

Hence, perhaps look at your potential earnings and if you can't get to 200K pretty soon, try to accumulate assets , such as bitcoin, to get yourself some cushion.
i don't mean you specifically..btw

EDIT: I am talking about a family of 3-4, not an individual.