None of those products can defend against Spectre or Meltdown.

Hello everyone, i'm new on this miner dstm and i would like to know if everything is good on my config i have something like this :

GPU0  39C  Sol/s: 515.7  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 509.8  I/s: 272.9  Sh: 1.82   0.99 277
GPU2  32C  Sol/s: 515.1  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 508.4  I/s: 272.3  Sh: 1.93   0.98 286 +
GPU1  41C  Sol/s: 509.4  Sol/W: 4.04  Avg: 506.7  I/s: 271.4  Sh: 1.89   0.99 270
GPU4  47C  Sol/s: 515.4  Sol/W: 4.04  Avg: 507.6  I/s: 272.2  Sh: 1.94   0.99 284
GPU3  36C  Sol/s: 511.1  Sol/W: 4.05  Avg: 508.1  I/s: 272.9  Sh: 1.73   0.99 273
GPU5  42C  Sol/s: 514.0  Sol/W: 4.02  Avg: 504.0  I/s: 270.4  Sh: 1.71   0.98 298 +
GPU6  35C  Sol/s: 505.0  Sol/W: 4.02  Avg: 500.0  I/s: 270.4  Sh: 1.71   0.87 298
GPU7  48C  Sol/s: 513.0  Sol/W: 4.02  Avg: 503.0  I/s: 270.4  Sh: 1.71   0.94 298
========== Sol/s: 3080.7 Sol/W: 4.04  Avg: 3044.5 I/s: 1632.2 Sh: 11.03  0.99 281

(don't care about number its an example) but if i don't have this signe : " + " at each endline its not a problem?

Thank you

AMD version for this would be Fantastic

This is my first post on this forum, despite being interested in crypto coins practically since beginning of BTC, so Hi everyone.

I'm thinking about building rig that would be most efficient. Everyone is comparing Sol/s or Sol/W, but as dstm stated (went practically through whole thread yesterday ), performance should be measured by I/s.
Do you know if anyone performed comparison based on I/s per W and how it relates to Sol/s and Sol/W in long term (as those are probablistic) for specific card models, brands? Could I ask you to submit your data here in following format:


When adding yours, please include result posted by previous users and add yours at the end. Normally I would add link to some anonymous notepad like shrib under #nv_dstm_zcash_perf, so others can process and compare it as they wish, but unfortunately i can't post any links

24h runs averages would be best. If brand model name has been previously added by someone, use the same model brand name so in longer term we can easy compare between products and models by filtering only by them. If possible provide results without OC/Undervolting.

Thanks and keep up good work!

I'm about the last person to defend the devfees charged by some of these miners, because many of them are still beta or even alpha-level in functionality/reliability, but I suspect the explanation here is that the devfee shares are mined at a much lower difficulty to better ensure a share is earned during the short mining period allotted.

But this is just a theory on my part.

That doesn't look right for a 1060; I'm getting about 305 Sols/s and 2.9 Sols/W at ~1900 Core and 4200 Mem and 85% TDP for each of my Asus GTX 1060 3GB "white" cards (still working on the core/mem/tdp optimization, but I feel these are decent results right now).

yeah 4.5 sols/watt is pretty nice.

Hello DSTM,

I did an experiment months ago using a Radeon hd 4850 (I know it's an old AMD card, and your miner is for NVidia) with CGMiner's 3.7.2 Intensity, which  goes from 8 to 20, and each increased value doubles the amount of threads used. I found some very interesting results with it: when I overclocked the gpu, I could not use and intensity value higher than 10; when I did the oposite (underclocked the gpu to the lowest value), I could use intensity 14 and actually have better hashrate with 65°C!
I'm a noob on this matter, but if this is possible to implement in your miner, it could be awesome!

How do I make my miner start with 1 min delay after a boot up? What should I put in my .bat file?