You're correct. That info is from the website, where they have some milestones

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.

If you seek a second opinion, it means you're not satisfied with the first one or want to confirm a diagnosis. You shouldn't blindly trust anybody, but rather take it with a grain of salt. The more opinions you hear, the better picture you'll have. And I'm sure eHealth will take care of its reputation and do a background check on doctors who will be on their platform.

Also if a doctor suggests a surgical procedure I think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary (which isn't quite often).

Usually machines are more likely to make less mistakes. Who knows maybe in healthcare it will develop the same way

Yes but you need to enter good parameters first. About diagnostic it is not easily done. Also, it is not that easy to people gives credit to a machine for an important diagnose.

I suppose that remote diagnostics will be a certain set of questions, such as a test, at each stage of which the neural network will cut unsuitable branches and approach the final diagnosis with some permissible error. Since without analyzing the patient, it is impossible to diagnose more accurately. But, for example, acute pain in pancreatitis, holicystitis and appendicitis can be very similar, and there it often happens that there is no time to argue, and an exact diagnose is already being made during the operation. For such emergency cases, of course, this platform is not suitable.

there will certainly be bugs at the beginning  , but those get iron out as time passes.

If you notice the first post. They are recruiting team and advisors . Looks to me like a one man army project