Lol, so which suggestions you can propose to identify someone who are not spammer?  
Your words are likely merit-begging ones.

More importantly, not spammers don't mean that those ones are constructive users.
The main purposes of merit system are letting spammers stucked at low ranks, and motivate users in the forum be more constructive because due to effects of the system, mostly constructive users can rank up when collecting enough merits through their constructive works.

It seems as though the generosity of giving out merits have died down quite a bit.  I don't know if it's cause those that are already holding high ranks don't care for the system or feel it's not worth their time to give out merits.  It is a very difficult task to earn merits these days, just like solo mining bitcoins. 

I think the merit system has to be changed. If not some people never gets merit points.

The fact that some people will never get Merit points is one of its great successes. Looking at your post history you are the type of user that should never rank up.

yeah. Thats definitely the reason behind merits. Legendary members cospiration to grab most bounties and signature campaigns money for themselves.

/sarc.

There is no way to earn merit under the current system.  Stop deluding yourselves.  The merit system here works EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE HIGH RANKING members.  Most of the senior members here are somewhat jaded and do not have time to look around for interesting posts, because hardly anything interests these people more - except maybe another bounty announcement where Senior members get 1000% more than Jr. Members, for example.

To make giving out merit an optional thing provides zero motivation for current members to give it out, and leaves the system in a state where no one ever advances.  The proof is in the pudding.  It's become a farce.

This leads to a small group of folks in control over a large group, incentivizing the hoarders to remain hoarders, particularly when the trend in airdrops and bounties is to reward higher members with such lopsided rewards compared to Jr. Members.

Like it or not, the merit system here is in no way egalitarian, and fosters a divide amongst the majority against a small minority.

There is the distinct air of superiority coming from most of the higher up members here and nothing you can say will change that.  Most members above the Jr. rank act like their shit doesn't stink simply because you got some merit colluding with other members.

Just the fact the Bitcointalk.org membership is swollen with Jr. Members says it all.  I personally do not care one way or another but think it is a riot that senior members around here are so spiteful of members below their ranks and go to great lengths to defend their lopsided position.

Granted, there are many spam accounts and other nefarious things going on, but the forum is ignoring a vast pool of knowledgable Jr. Members with it's merit system.  This is an unsustainable path to take for long-term growth.

Don't take my word for it.  Just keep doing what you are doing.  Other forums will come along and supplant this one, because this one is becoming more like an exclusive club for a small percentage of its members rather than an idea to promote the next paradigm in currencies.

Change your ways, Bitcointalk.

Edit:  And this post is a good post worthy of at least one merit point - the points are clearly stated, and it is similar to the opinion of thousands of Jr. Members.  My point is I won't receive any merit for this post because it attacks the ones responsible for delivering merit points.  Thus proving the merit system here is not about rewarding intelligent posts, but instead to keep Jr. Members in their places.  LOL!

Great analysis again, seems like the meirt distribution is following the bitcoin price
People, HODL BTCs not sMerits!

I agree with you that the post is well substantiated, and has decent arguments, but it has so many absolutes in it, seemingly reverse psychology and so much threatening that I cannot bring myself to merit it... and so far, I have dished out over 500 merits, so in the sending merits, I am not afraid to merit posts, and I don't even require a very high standard as long as I believe that there is some kind of meaningful contribution in the post or the poster.. but I have a hard time meriting posts when posters can't find some balance beyond seeming to whine for the sake of it, or their seemingly self-obsessed focus.

Edit:

I believe that I attempted to explain that I don't think that my merit sending standards are high, and I suppose that my failure/refusal to merit that post demonstrates that sending merits could be whimsical and there is a decent amount of subjectivity in merit sending.. which such subjective discretion is not likely to go away any time soon...  and even some luck of timing could make a difference in whether a post receives merit, too...

It is interesting to see users joined topics in Meta, including this one, to complain about merit system unfairness months after the lauch day of merit system.