It is always great to hear good things about a casino out of nowhere. You see a lot of bad complaints about casinos and people do not hold back while they are complaining about a website, sometimes they even complain about something when its their own fault and casino did nothing wrong and the casino is forced to defend themselves for something they did not commit at all.

It is easy to spread rumor about how horrible a casino is and just leave, as long as you leave that stain it will be there no matter how much you wash it off. People who love a casino doesn't usually come in and just say "yeah this website is doing exactly what it suppose to do" because lets be honest being a good casino means not doing anything out of what you promise to do, nothing shady, no scamming, no withdraw issues, no bet cancelling, no stealing of funds, these are all things you would expect from a casino anyway so they do not come in and talk about it but at this day and age when all other casinos have issues and there are only few decent ones left we really need this type of good reviews as well.

I personally love playing here as well and NEVER had any issue, not just big, never had small tiny issues neither, always been perfect.

I have temporarily paused games on bustabit because of a potential security vulnerability. All users' funds are safe and if the vulnerability is confirmed then bankroll investors will be reimbursed for any losses.

Good thing that you able to spot it out directly and hopefully that vulnerability didnt cause any loss amount into its investors.When this thing do happen?

betking are announcing unconfirmed amount of 100 BTC being hacked at Bustabit

What are you talking about? When he said it on his website, the information was already in this thread.

@JollyGood, you literally created like 4 threads to complain about BetKing. Please don't turn this into a 5th.



Looking at: https://dicesites.com/bustabit  it looks like a hit of ~119 bitcoin in the last day. Assuming this was the result of a security problem, Daniels has already promised to cover this out of his own pocket, so investors should be pretty relieved.

Fortunately 119 bitcoin is pretty manageable compared to the site's bankroll, or profits (for both investors and commissions). But going forward I think I'd like to see a more explicit outline between Daniel and investors about how security issues like this are dealt with. The site bankroll is a massive 3.2k bitcoin at the moment, so that represents a pretty huge liability (e.g. imagine if a lucky whale won half, then turns out they weren't actually lucky) so I think it's worth dealing with.