Bustabit credits deposits after a single confirmation. If you're really itching to play, increase the network fee when sending BTC to the site in order to get an expedited deposit timeframe.

I believe that you can also pay a small fee to precredit an unconfirmed deposit if you forgot to send with a high fee.

This is a nice calculator to determine the chance of a losing streak of certain length over a number of games.

As soon as you decide to put a large bet on a small cash-out value, there will certainly be a red value that is less than what you thought. Maybe this is a psychological attitude I do not know.

I know that an each bet does not depend on another

If an event  (in this case, a bust at 90x) does not occur during the time during it usually took place, then the chance that the event will occur will increases.

Yes, bustabit is very conservative when deciding which transactions it allows the user to precredit but that should come with no surprise. And almost everyone else waits for at least 1 confirmation anyway.

I have one problem with the site. After some indefinite time after loading (reloading) the page it is just gray, while gray fill can be seen that in the background the site managed to load. Clearing the cache helps, but script settings fly along with it. Is there any way to avoid this? I use the Google browser.

I don't get how people can't wait for just one confirmation, this doesn't really take that long after all it is just 1 confirmation.

If you feel like you are not sure about gambling after half an hour maybe you should not gamble to begin with. If this was a complaint from investors I would totally get it because investors would want people to gamble with some hype right away and lose all their money instead of waiting half an hour or an hour to gamble so they wouldn't think about it too long and give up and decide not to gamble, investors want people to lose money after all.

But, when you are a gambler who is telling people you can't gamble fast enough because it requires confirmation then I am sorry but there is two possibilities, either you are an addict or you want to double spend.

as i said before this game rigged when they saw to many players win they update new patch also when btc goes high they update the site so rigged

If your invested funds were only used for lots of low-risk bets, then Daniel would have absolutely no reason to even take your money Pretty much the only reason that bankroll investing even exists is because the site owner doesn't want to take the risk/variance themselves, so they give it to investors in exchange for some of the EV.

Unfortunately there's no free-lunch, and the sites that promise such (e.g. "bitcoin doublers") tend to be scams. But I think you did the right thing by divesting.

I think the good rule of thumb for bankroll investing, is never put more in than you're comfortable losing. It's been a long time since i've done it, but with a full-kelly of risk, my "angry whale" simulations show that the vast majority (like 80%???) of times an angry whale (someone with a lot more money than the site itself has, and determined to fuck the site) will be able to cause the site to lose >50% of the bankroll (the other 20% of the time, investors do extraordinarily well though ).

But yeah, the part that's quite unfortunate is that there's not always so much action. So you kind of get used to (and expect) the low volatility, and then a whale comes and drastically alters everything.

I tried it in the Opera, for about half a day it worked fine, then again a gray page on top of the site. Internet searches do not help. The same thing happened on the phone, only for some reason it worked longer (maybe because I came in less often).
https://imgur.com/a/ipoIjna

No high volume ones, i don't think. I'd just check out bustabit.com/license.txt and go through sites listed there and see if any of them look interesting.


The bonus system was kind of neat, but the state-of-the-art bonus-bots just became so good, that it was really impossible for a casual player (or coder!) to really compete against.

--

On a side note, it sounds pretty lame -- but one thing I think could be fun for pvp gambling would be large series of rock-paper-scissors against a single opponent. The only non-exploitable strategy in rock-paper-scissors is by playing purely randomly, but that is guaranteed to have no expected profit for either player. (So if someone is being lame and playing randomly, you could detect that and stop playing with them after a while). I think it could potentially be a fun pvp game, where the complexity is such it's be accessible both people and bots.   (Although really hard to know without having built such a thing to try it out)