Actually, I didn't mention any data. I am aware that the results of the game are fair in a completely random and provably fair.
But my observation was a different claim that users were more likely to be busted when they do a high amount of betting.
There are different statements.
If it's random it can't be busting some users more often than others. Or are you playing captain obvious by saying that low probability bets are less likely to win?
No, I'm not playing Mr.Smart or Mr. Open-Eyed.
This is just my observation. I don't play every time, but instead of this, I only watch the games sometimes. This observation is not a proven data or statistic.
I just wanted to leave here a comment, that's all
So, what is your observation exactly? We may not really understand what you were trying to say. On one hand you are saying that results are random and provably fair, on another you are saying people are more inclined to lose when they bet higher. So which one is it, is it random? Or is it when people gamble a lot?
What you should accept is that when you say "the odds are when people gamble higher amounts they end up losing" doesn't really sound "random" and "provably fair" like you claim.
We all agree that it is definitely random and provably fair, you do agree on that as well but you insist that people lose when they gamble high amounts. If you could explain to us how a game could be both provably fair and still make people lose when they bet more, I am sure we could understand you better.
