<<  >> (p.14)
    Author Topic: Pollard's kangaroo ECDLP solver  (Read 62388 times)

    • WanderingPhilospher
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1386
    Merit: 269

    Shooters Shoot...


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 05:25:14 PM
     #261
    Quote from: WhyMe on May 23, 2020, 05:20:21 PM
    Doing some tests with a 1070ti.
    Why playing with OC does not affect hashrate ?


    I'm not sure but I noticed the same thing...I normally adjust volts, etc. and it seemed to decrease the MKey rate a small percentage.

  • WhyMe
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 658
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 05:32:14 PM
     #262
    Did some other tests :
    1070 : 284MKs
    1070ti : 291MKs
    1080 : 306MKs
    Why so less difference ?

    All 3 cards are on 1x riser, but I tested 1070ti on 16x and there's no difference with 1x

  • Etar
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 654
    Merit: 316


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 05:36:17 PM
     #263
    Quote from: WhyMe on May 23, 2020, 05:32:14 PM
    Did some other tests :
    1070 : 284MKs
    1070ti : 291MKs
    1080 : 306MKs
    Why so less difference ?

    All 3 cards are on 1x riser, but I tested 1070ti on 16x and there's no difference with 1x
    6x1070 1697Mkey/s, but it is no good idea used 1000 series in calculations.
    Huge amount of power and result little bit more as 1 rtx 2080ti, best card for calculation power/mkeys 2000 series

  • WhyMe
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 658
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 05:40:13 PM
     #264
    I'm testing with what I already have Smiley
    Have some numbers on 2000 series ?

  • Etar
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 654
    Merit: 316


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 05:43:10 PM
     #265
    Quote from: WhyMe on May 23, 2020, 05:40:13 PM
    I'm testing with what I already have Smiley
    Have some numbers on 2000 series ?
    5x1066=1050mkeys
    6x1070=1690mkeys
    10x1080ti=4200mkeys
    6x2070 = 4900mkeys
    8x2080ti = 9000mkeys
    4xV100 = 7200mkeys
    that what i tested

  • WhyMe
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 658
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 05:48:35 PM
     #266
    Thanks

  • WhyMe
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 658
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 05:56:02 PM
     #267
    With prices I see here, 1MKs on 2080ti is 200% of 1MKs on 2070 !

  • Etar
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 654
    Merit: 316


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 06:01:48 PM
     #268
    Quote from: WhyMe on May 23, 2020, 05:56:02 PM
    With prices I see here, 1MKs on 2080ti is 200% of 1MKs on 2070 !
    i agree with you that 2070 is the best card to calculation and mining in 2000series by criterion cost/hashrate/power

  • WanderingPhilospher
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1386
    Merit: 269

    Shooters Shoot...


    View Profile
    May 23, 2020, 06:13:16 PM
     #269
    Quote from: alek76 on May 23, 2020, 06:01:40 PM
    Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on May 23, 2020, 09:19:16 AM
    Ok, I figured out how to see the difference; my NB_JUMP has to be 32 or less and I can then see about a 2^7 difference in avg jumps at 40 bit range. Will test and compare later today.
    Do not forget to put the seed before the table and after.
    You can check this:
    Code:
    by Pollard (.. The best choice of m (mean jump size: 2^27) is w^(1/2)/2 ..)
    Create Jump Table (size: 32) Max Jump: 2^28
    Jump: 0 Distance: 1
    Jump: 1 Distance: 2
    Jump: 2 Distance: 4
    Jump: 3 Distance: 8
    Jump: 4 Distance: 10
    Jump: 5 Distance: 20
    Jump: 6 Distance: 40
    Jump: 7 Distance: 80
    Jump: 8 Distance: 100
    Jump: 9 Distance: 200
    Jump: 10 Distance: 400
    Jump: 11 Distance: 800
    Jump: 12 Distance: 1000
    Jump: 13 Distance: 2000
    Jump: 14 Distance: 4000
    Jump: 15 Distance: 8000
    Jump: 16 Distance: 5FF2560
    Jump: 17 Distance: D25C0B2
    Jump: 18 Distance: 93C08DF
    Jump: 19 Distance: E01F5E3
    Jump: 20 Distance: BEE16A6
    Jump: 21 Distance: A3F7E94
    Jump: 22 Distance: B660AF2
    Jump: 23 Distance: D180EA
    Jump: 24 Distance: 36B8F2
    Jump: 25 Distance: 1976C19
    Jump: 26 Distance: B4BD788
    Jump: 27 Distance: A4193F8
    Jump: 28 Distance: C82D7F7
    Jump: 29 Distance: B42ABDF
    Jump: 30 Distance: 68FDB3B
    Jump: 31 Distance: 95F559
    Jump Avg distance: 2^26.03
    I do.

    My results:
    Code:
    Range width: 2^40
    Jump: 0 Distance: 1
    Jump: 1 Distance: 2
    Jump: 2 Distance: 4
    Jump: 3 Distance: 8
    Jump: 4 Distance: 10
    Jump: 5 Distance: 20
    Jump: 6 Distance: 40
    Jump: 7 Distance: 80
    Jump: 8 Distance: 100
    Jump: 9 Distance: 200
    Jump: 10 Distance: 400
    Jump: 11 Distance: 800
    Jump: 12 Distance: 1000
    Jump: 13 Distance: 2000
    Jump: 14 Distance: 4000
    Jump: 15 Distance: 8000
    Jump: 16 Distance: AAF37
    Jump: 17 Distance: 141FFB
    Jump: 18 Distance: D8795
    Jump: 19 Distance: 5100D
    Jump: 20 Distance: 96CE9
    Jump: 21 Distance: C66E9
    Jump: 22 Distance: 76A30
    Jump: 23 Distance: 1416AC
    Jump: 24 Distance: 18D
    Jump: 25 Distance: 1EB7B5
    Jump: 26 Distance: 45C0E
    Jump: 27 Distance: 1F48AA
    Jump: 28 Distance: 2E7AC
    Jump: 29 Distance: 7A66D
    Jump: 30 Distance: 179085
    Jump: 31 Distance: E4B99
    Jump Avg distance: 2^18.74

  • virus-cyber
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 26
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 07:15:28 AM
     #270
    zielar
    I hope you do not find you are greedy
    and they will be taken from you again

  • MrFreeDragon
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 443
    Merit: 350


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 07:57:28 AM
     #271
    Quote from: zielar on May 23, 2020, 01:36:32 PM
    Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
    Greetings !

    How much power are you going to use for this task?

  • Etar
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 654
    Merit: 316


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 09:20:26 AM
     #272
    @JeanLuc I have a suggestion regarding the server and client side.
    I think that it will not optimally support a constant client-server connection. Firstly, because if data is not transmitted to keep connection, you need to play ping ping from time to time.
    And Windows does not always work out the client shutdown correctly. If internet broken on client side, windows os on server side don`t know about this and keep this connection like live.
    And this can lead to errors in the socket when trying to send data to an already non-existent connection.
    In my opinion, it would be better if the client accumulated its DPs before some moment, and then sent them to the server at once.
    The amount of accumulated dp should be related to the size of dp bit.
    The second is that only the client should be the initiator of all messages, again to avoid errors in the socket.
    In this case, even if the server crashes, the clients will still continue job and accumulate their dp and after the server is online they will be sent.

  • zielar
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 282
    Merit: 115


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 12:37:40 PM
     #273
    Quote from: MrFreeDragon on May 24, 2020, 07:57:28 AM
    Quote from: zielar on May 23, 2020, 01:36:32 PM
    Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
    Greetings !

    How much power are you going to use for this task?

    I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
    #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 2^27.55]
    If you want - you can send me a donation to my BTC wallet address 31hgbukdkehcuxcedchkdbsrygegyefbvd

  • Elliptic23
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 22
    Merit: 3


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 01:37:23 PM
     #274
    Quote from: zielar on May 24, 2020, 12:37:40 PM
    Quote from: MrFreeDragon on May 24, 2020, 07:57:28 AM
    Quote from: zielar on May 23, 2020, 01:36:32 PM
    Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
    Greetings !

    How much power are you going to use for this task?

    I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
    #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 2^27.55]

    Why even bother with #110 with that kind of power? Now theres no point in anyone else even trying to solve it because it's almost certain you will.

  • arulbero
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2023
    Merit: 2267


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 01:45:21 PM
     #275
    Quote from: zielar on May 24, 2020, 12:37:40 PM
    I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
    #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 2^27.55]

    The Pollard's kangaroo ECDLP solver needs on average about 2*(2^(109/2)) = 2^55.5 steps to retrieve this private key, with a total power of 460000Mkeys/s =  2^38.8 steps/sec it would take 2^16.7 seconds, about 30 hours.

    With the same power, for the key #115 (114 bit) it would take 2^19.2 seconds,  about 170 hours (7 days).

  • dextronomous
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 105


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 02:05:47 PM
     #276
    so we all got no chance again,
    can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.

  • Etar
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 654
    Merit: 316


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 02:14:43 PM
     #277
    Quote from: dextronomous on May 24, 2020, 02:05:47 PM
    so we all got no chance again,
    can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.

    This topic is not about making money, but about the ability to cut a difficult task like finding the key to the puzzle 110.
    Which before that was extremely difficult to solve.
    Moreover, JeanLuc has a couple more tricks in the warehouse to improve his brainchild, I'm sure.
    After all, no one forbids joining in the search for a key. Why spend each separately a bunch of electricity and money, if you can combine work and do it much more efficiently.
    Can create a common pool and solve problems together, divide production in proportion to the work performed.

  • dextronomous
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 105


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 02:18:12 PM
     #278
    i know i am in jeanluc's house now,
    know that man, his software,
    difficult i know, meant to say, dang 460000,
    damn so that i almost forgot one 0. wtf,
    prolly you already got those moneyz. so wth.
    said nough, no joining the pool thanks.
    all good luck,. with not that much of those moneys,

  • MrFreeDragon
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 443
    Merit: 350


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 02:33:15 PM
     #279
    Quote from: dextronomous on May 24, 2020, 02:05:47 PM
    so we all got no chance again,
    can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.

    This message is just one big LOL  Grin
    What kind of chances did you expect without developing the solver and without enough power to solve?

    Jean_Luc made a great job developing the tool and making it available for the public. It also helped him to implement the improvements as he had the feedback. All other developers did not publish the code, but just were trying to sell it.

    Real life is not a fairy tale where one man grants the super fast code to you, and another man grants access to super high power.

  • MrFreeDragon
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 443
    Merit: 350


    View Profile
    May 24, 2020, 02:35:48 PM
     #280
    Quote from: zielar on May 24, 2020, 12:37:40 PM
    Quote from: MrFreeDragon on May 24, 2020, 07:57:28 AM
    Quote from: zielar on May 23, 2020, 01:36:32 PM
    Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
    Greetings !

    How much power are you going to use for this task?

    I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
    #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 2^27.55]

    This is really huge power! ) Is it like 300-400 cards Tesla V100 GTX 2080ti ?
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 146 »
      Print  
Page 13
Viewing Page: 14

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com