their next target will be to meet 1 million Bitcoins by buying Bitcoin step by step.
If they keep buying Bitcoin step by step, they will definitely be able to reach the highest level through Bitcoin holding.
Lol where are they going to see it? And even if they do get up to a million it wouldn't be easy with all the competitions from different market.
The point is that the more companies will race to buy bitcoins, the better for Microstrategy.
The more the competition, the higher the price for a single bitcoin, the better the situation for Strategy, that will post massive EPS due to rising valuations of thei stash.
This is pure marketing genius.
Yet dangerous game. It seems to me that it appears dangerous, but it really is not as dangerous as it seems.. that is part of what makes it additionally genius.
Accordingly, MSTR has been playing this and largely showing their hands the whole time, and surely there may be some products that are more risky than others, but overall, Saylor and MSTR has been playing in ways that keep their debt in control.. pumping bitcoin using other people's money and then when the debt converts, then MSTR owns the bitcoin (and sure, whichever shareholders they have), which Saylor is the biggest shareholder, even though he has been allowing some of his position to dilute..
The point is that the more companies will race to buy bitcoins, the better for Microstrategy.
The more the competition, the higher the price for a single bitcoin, the better the situation for Strategy, that will post massive EPS due to rising valuations of thei stash.
This is pure marketing genius.
Yet dangerous game.
My thoughts too. They are making other firms experience FOMO to have a share before it flies off
While they reap the benefits of getting at lower average price and quantity.
I believe the companies know they are at a disadvantage hence why twenty one plans on touching a niche MSTR isn't focusing on
If they can't be number one, they can atleast fight for number two. If whatever XXI is doing is better than MSTR, then MSTR will just include that approach to the extent that it might be actually superior... which I have my doubts about any new techniques that are even meaningfully superior rather than just perhaps a little bit superior, here and there.