Yes, that's what I felt before. Now I no longer feel that worry because the casinos I usually play at are very trustworthy and offer a wide selection, so if I ever win big, I'm no longer afraid of not getting paid.

Regarding KYC, if a casino has a very good reputation, I wouldn't hesitate to do it. I trust them to keep my personal data safe, even though there are no guarantees. But with a very good reputation, that's one of the things that makes me more confident.
[/quote]

You will not get worried to comply on the requirements asked especially if the casino is reputable and many people could vouch their legitimacy.

Also if they are delivering those huge rewards won by their gamblers. In the case of reputable casino we saw in Bitcointalk so far almost all of them are good gambling platform to use. Its good that we have some threads like this to discuss about any matters since we would know their status if they are truly providing good service to those people gamble in their platform. I only provide KYC if the casino is reputable in this platform and so far none of those casino fail me so far since they are still standing strong and manage to do good business here.

What i notice about some gamblers is that, they are two expectant of something that they even know that it is impossible, let's just say that this is individual mindset deceiving them, as a matter of fact there things a gambler or gamblers generally can't make to come to reality, I think it will be very nice for gamblers to let those things be, I have seen the reason why some gamblers prefer just gambling for fun so that they'll not be disturbed by any kind of misfeeling of losing a game by not putting much expectations and betting on game they are conversant with and also staking them with the amount they can allow to slide.

You are right, let's not imitate or imitate others who want to take back what they lost in their past gambling. We should only face what is in the present or to come
and just accept that we lost in our past games at casinos.

Because if we still look back at what was bad for us in terms of our gambling that the result was bad,
we will not be able to move forward then of course.

The Truth be told, gambling results are quietly unknown to us as a gambler regardless of the level of skills that you think you have developed over the time, you can't predict what the outcome of a game will be and that is why we need to do everything possible to remain in a position where we can acknowledge the place of luck in whatever games that we play.

It is no problem if we keep trying but we must remember that we will need limitations. We never know when luck comes and if you don't use limitation with the money, you will only lose more money without winning. The important thing is we must be responsible in gambling and not chase the win or the luck. We may win by predicting the match but we should remember that will depend on the luck is in our side or not. We can only guess and expect to win but we never know the result.

The word we should keep trying really sounds to me like encouraging to gamble for more then experience possible addiction in long run. I don't want to test out myself towards this and chase something since I know how casino works.

That's the reason I just don't give any damn towards those people saying that they have working strategy since after all every result is actually unpredictable. We might win on some of our prediction but for sure its not going to last long. That's why I'd manage to have limited budget and session so that I don't exceed on my limits then could recover easily if I experience bad luck.

Perhaps what is meant by "we must keep trying" is not to mean that we must continue gambling in a short period of time or to chase losses, but rather within a time frame that you have agreed upon (consistent and scheduled). For example, if you bet/gamble once or twice a week, you should always try at that time in the same context or game. Of course, this is not a reliable strategy, meaning it is impossible to always guarantee winning, but I am sure that as disciplined gamblers, they will schedule their playing time.

This is the display I am referring to, the image was taken from one of the well-known casinos on this forum. I hope that Rainbet representatives can read my feedback on this matter and hopefully we can see it implemented soon. Why is this important? Because some gamblers prefer and feel more comfortable betting with the fiat display. In addition to allowing gamblers to more easily check their balances, the addition of the fiat display also often attracts more gamblers to play.

Some of the larger casinos on this forum have already implemented this feature, so Rainbet may also need to consider it.
In dollars I can only bet a minimum of $0.2, but in fiat I can bet a minimum of $0.02.

You are correct, and Rainbet has indeed implemented it, but there is no IDR fiat currency as I mentioned earlier here https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5479271.msg65610232#msg65610232

Therefore, I hope Rainbet can offer more fiat currencies. Isn't it better to have more options?