<<  >> (p.294)
    Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2145112 times)

    • ikicha
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 788
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 12:40:23 PM
     #5861
    New version v.11.3 is work perfectly, thanks for your update dev! and now, claymore cryptonight is completely free!

  • mx100
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 49
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 02:10:39 PM
     #5862
    Hi guys,
    What software does NVidia use? Huh

  • Crate Mayne
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 95
    Merit: 11


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 03:36:28 PM
     #5863
    Quote from: mx100 on April 04, 2018, 02:10:39 PM
    Hi guys,
    What software does NVidia use? Huh

    None in an ideal world, because pointing Nvidia's at Cryptonight is a waste of your time and money. I have some $70 2GB RX 550s that outpace 1060 6GBs, and 4GB RX 570s that do the same to 1080TIs.

    Grab your profits from algos your cards are actually good at = more profits  Smiley

    But to answer your question, i know at least XMR-Stak does, probably a bunch others too.

  • gazu
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 19
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 04:18:52 PM
     #5864
    Quote from: Claymore on March 30, 2018, 04:16:06 PM
    Quote from: air133 on March 30, 2018, 01:09:35 PM
    When new versions with v7 algo support???

    In a few days.

    Hi, Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v9.7 with v7 algo support? Never?

  • Call_Me_Bambi
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 574
    Merit: 261


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 06:05:54 PM
     #5865
    Is this version capable of mining the up-and-coming TurtleCoin fork which will use the "Cyrptonight-Lite Variant 1" . I know Claymore will mine "Cyrptonight-Lite" but will it work with this variant ?

  • BSAlex
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 239
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 07:45:34 PM
     #5866
    Quote from: monroexbtc on April 03, 2018, 11:11:46 AM


    Do you mean XMR stak is 20% faster than Claymore?

    Yes. Read my previous comments and links.
    [/quote]

    No, XMR-STAK do NOT outperform CCNM by 20%. At least not with Terascale GPUs. It is not easy even to get comparable performance. The problem is that CCNM wil not use Terascale any more after v7 fork.

  • hexing110
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 6
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 07:50:19 PM
     #5867
    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post;topic=638915.6000;num_replies=6012
    Hi, Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v9.7 with v7 algo support?
    Accustomed to using Claymore's 9.7 version
    Can you add the V7 and XHV algorithms to the 9.7 version? thank you very much

  • The Crazy Miner
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 33
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 07:54:27 PM
     #5868
    claymore cryptonote gives me 820hs per rx 580. I am trying to mine Haven coin though and the claymore cryptonote miner doesn't work. I downloaded the xmr stak haven miner and its a pile of crap

  • dougyfresh
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 21
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 08:27:13 PM
     #5869
    Quote from: gazu on April 04, 2018, 04:18:52 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on March 30, 2018, 04:16:06 PM
    Quote from: air133 on March 30, 2018, 01:09:35 PM
    When new versions with v7 algo support???

    In a few days.

    Hi, Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v9.7 with v7 algo support? Never?

    Ditto.. I have an old 6950 that works with v9.7 and... It would be awesome to be able to put it to use on Pow7...just for fun...in my room

  • monroexbtc
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 8
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 10:00:57 PM
     #5870
    Quote from: BSAlex on April 04, 2018, 07:45:34 PM
    Quote from: monroexbtc on April 03, 2018, 11:11:46 AM


    Do you mean XMR stak is 20% faster than Claymore?

    Yes. Read my previous comments and links.

    No, XMR-STAK do NOT outperform CCNM by 20%. At least not with Terascale GPUs. It is not easy even to get comparable performance. The problem is that CCNM wil not use Terascale any more after v7 fork.

    [/quote]

    Again, read my previous comments and links. You can achieve parity with XMR stak and even outperform CCNM precisely on TeraScale. It depends if you find the right intensity and worksize. Also the main problem with STAK and TeraScale was that it only detected 384mb of memory which limited every single card, now that has been addressed in this issue through my help and the help of other contributors https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak/issues/472

    I got 6990s doing ~395-400h/s per core, ~800h/s per gpu total on stak, vs 374 per core or ~ 750h/s on CCNM. Core clock and memory clocks identical in both cases.

    It's no problem that CCNM will not support terascale anymore, problem is people are too lazy to work out a solution for themselves.

  • pskhv
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 11:00:15 PM
     #5871
    CaperVerde and Bonaire/Tobago not support now? Before hardfork i'm used version 9.7.
    Claymore, add this adapters or add pow7 to 9.7 please.

    Code:
    ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
    ║           Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3            ║
    ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

    AMD Cards available: 2
    GPU #0: Capeverde (AMD Radeon R7 200 Series), 1024 MB available, 10 compute unit
    s (pci bus 2:0:0)
    GPU #1: Bonaire (AMD Radeon R7 200 Series), 2048 MB available, 14 compute units
    (pci bus 3:0:0)
    POOL version
    No ASM binary found for GPU 0
    No ASM binary found for GPU 1
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 320, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 656MB)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 1836MB)
    Total cards: 2

    . . .

    XMR - Total Speed: 0 H/s, Total Shares: 0(0+0), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
    XMR: GPU0 0 H/s, GPU1 0 H/s
    Incorrect XMR shares: none
    1 minute average XMR total speed: 0 H/s

  • Littlegrand
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 104
    Merit: 5


    View Profile
    April 04, 2018, 11:30:36 PM
     #5872
    Any word if Claymore is going to add Cryponote-Heavy to the miner?

    Thanks,
    --J

  • MadSilence
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 37
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 06:38:05 AM
     #5873
    Hi man!

    I really love your miner! I use both the monero and ZEC version.

    I was wondering if by any chance you could include the amd 6xxx line in the next update. I have many rigs running 6xxx cards still and after the fork they will be totally useless!!!!! :O  I can donate some crypto your way if it helps!

    My old 6990 is still hashing pretty good!=)

    Thanks for your good work on the miner!!!=)

  • micax1
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 708
    Merit: 502


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 08:01:40 AM
     #5874
    Just tried 11.3 on nicehash cryptonightv7 - getting 100% rejects with : "Shareabovetarget" error,
    Anyone knows if its just nicehash testnet or miner settings problem?
    Thanks!

  • Atomicc
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 301
    Merit: 31


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 08:34:29 AM
     #5875
    Is there any option to mine Cryptonight Heavy algo (Haven, Stellite...), with this latest version?
    Thank You for an answer...

  • The Hitman
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 17
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 10:10:07 AM
     #5876
    Quote from: Atomicc on April 05, 2018, 08:34:29 AM
    Is there any option to mine Cryptonight Heavy algo (Haven, Stellite...), with this latest version?
    Thank You for an answer...

    Same question. Im so used to Claymore for SUMOKOIN. I hope they have time to add CN-Heavy support, coz they will be so busy making new versions every 6 months for XMR

  • JuanHungLo
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 935
    Merit: 1001


    I don't always drink...


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 12:03:30 PM
     #5877
    I wanting to find out if anyone else is, or has, experienced this problem detailed below:

    Win 7-64 with Robinhood's AMD drivers (22.19.659.1).

    I have an interesting problem in 2 of my rigs that use 2 Rx 470 8GB Sapphires (Samsung):
    Here is batch:

    set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=1
    set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
    set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
    set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
    set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

    NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool stratum+tcp://78.46.85.142:5223 -xwal <address> -xpsw x -di 01 -h 0 -dmem 1 -tt 80 -tstop 90 -cclock 1150 -mclock 1900 -allpools 1

    If I use version, 11.0, 11.1, or 11.2, they run fine and get about 0.934 Kh/s
    If I use version 11.3, the first GPU reports 0.934 but the second one ALWAYS reports 0.235 whether I reboot or run as admin

    Even more interesting, all my other rigs with 5 of the same GPUs are ALL reporting about 0.934 per GPU as expected

    Please let me know if you have experienced this and what you did to fix it.
    I have tried reducing -h, turning off -dmem, lowering clocks, lowering mem, uninstalling Trixx, uninstalling GPU-z, uninstalling ASUS GPU, CCleaning system, reboots - all to no avail.
    Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton

  • 4ward
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 473
    Merit: 18


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 12:47:58 PM
     #5878
    something has changed for Aeon between 11.2 and 11.3

    same with the same options:
    Code:
    NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool stratum+tcp://mine.aeon-pool.com:5555 -xwal xxx -xpsw x -lite 1

    11.2 correctly submits shares:
    Code:
    ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
    ║           Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.2            ║
    ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

    CryptoNight-Lite mining mode is enabled
    AEO: 1 pool is specified
    Main Aeon pool is mine.aeon-pool.com:5555
    At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
    Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
    Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
    Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools
    OpenCL initializing...
    AMD Cards available: 1
    GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
    GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
    POOL version
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 2304, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 4722MB)
    Total cards: 1
    AEO: Stratum - connecting to 'mine.aeon-pool.com' <136.243.64.181> port 5555 (unsecure)
    AEO: Stratum - Connected (mine.aeon-pool.com:5555) (unsecure)
    "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
    Watchdog enabled
    Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 4028

    AEO: 04/05/18-15:35:02 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0; share value 0x0005b43a)
    Share accepted (47 ms)!
    AEO: 04/05/18-15:35:04 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0; share value 0x000555ec)
    Share accepted (63 ms)!
    AEO: 04/05/18-15:35:06 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0; share value 0x0005e479)
    Share accepted (47 ms)!

    11.3 all shares incorrect:
    Code:
    ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
    ║           Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3            ║
    ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

    CryptoNight-Lite mining mode is enabled
    AEO: 1 pool is specified
    Main Aeon pool is mine.aeon-pool.com:5555
    At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
    Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
    Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
    Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools
    OpenCL initializing...
    AMD Cards available: 1
    GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
    GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
    POOL version
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 2304, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 4722MB)
    Total cards: 1
    AEO: Stratum - connecting to 'mine.aeon-pool.com' <136.243.64.181> port 5555 (unsecure)
    AEO: Stratum - Connected (mine.aeon-pool.com:5555) (unsecure)
    "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
    Watchdog enabled
    Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 4028

    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
    GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.

    "-dmem 0" or reducing -h doesn't help
    Forager - MultiPool profit switching multi-miner with MSI Afterburner integration

  • Littlegrand
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 104
    Merit: 5


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 01:16:13 PM
     #5879
    I have 2 asus rx 580s that about 70% of the time will report a dropped hashrate at either 60% or 90% lower than the others. I just keep turning those cards off and on until it corrects(num key). Once I get a normal hashrate, it stays that way unless miner reboots. It can take 20+ tries.

    Not sure if its the same problem. Happens on Eth Claymore miner for me as well but never happened until 11.3 on CN.

    ***edit***
    And also never started happening until Claymore 11.? on Eth, not sure if that means anything.  Was thinking of changing bios but haven't gotten around to it.

    --J

  • Nassim
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 5
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    April 05, 2018, 01:18:13 PM
     #5880
    Quote from: pskhv on April 04, 2018, 11:00:15 PM
    CaperVerde and Bonaire/Tobago not support now? Before hardfork i'm used version 9.7.
    Claymore, add this adapters or add pow7 to 9.7 please.

    Code:
    ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
    ║           Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3            ║
    ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

    AMD Cards available: 2
    GPU #0: Capeverde (AMD Radeon R7 200 Series), 1024 MB available, 10 compute unit
    s (pci bus 2:0:0)
    GPU #1: Bonaire (AMD Radeon R7 200 Series), 2048 MB available, 14 compute units
    (pci bus 3:0:0)
    POOL version
    No ASM binary found for GPU 0
    No ASM binary found for GPU 1
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 320, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 656MB)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 1836MB)
    Total cards: 2

    . . .

    XMR - Total Speed: 0 H/s, Total Shares: 0(0+0), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
    XMR: GPU0 0 H/s, GPU1 0 H/s
    Incorrect XMR shares: none
    1 minute average XMR total speed: 0 H/s

    Yep, Capeverde GPU not supported with the latest version.
    I don't think that is intended. a compile error maybe?
    Pages: « 1 ... 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 [294] 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 »
      Print  
Page 293
Viewing Page: 294

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com