I am lamenting the emission cut did not pass a year ago. Currently we just get loads and loads of cheap XMR on top of what we have, and when the value is realized in the wider audience, it feels almost as bad as a premine, with great concentrations of coin in the hands of people who already were rich and smart and forward-looking.
The intention is not to punish from such qualities, but now the reward is so excessive it makes me blush

"Equal opportunity" loses some of its allure when nobody is using it (and then complain afterwards, same as with
BTC)
I beg to disagree here. People overestimate how high the emission rate actually is. Furthermore, changing the emission rate would have broken the social contract and would probably look way more sketchy from the outside than the fast emission rate. I also agree with wachtwoord on this matter.
Well, we all agree with the argument about breaking the social contract and eventually reached 100% consensus on the matter. But we can still feel sad about the things we can't change.
In keeping with my post above, I believe the emission is important sometimes and unimportant at other times. But if we look at different altcoins with varying inflation, it does not seem that supply inflation of coins has been significant in recent history:
By the end of 2015, LTC's supply inflation will be about 33%. Dogecoin's supply inflation for 2015 will be about 5.26%. Monero's supply inflation in 2015 will be even higher than Litecoin's. Peercoin's supply inflation for 2015 is slightly lower than Dogecoin's. This is a huge range. But when we look at the LTC, XMR, PPC, and DOGE charts, do we really see much of a difference?
Larger macroeconomic effects (namely, an extended post-bubble bear market) has hammered all the altcoins into the ground regardless of their individual supply inflation schedules. So in the end, I think emission has basically been a nonfactor over the past year.
Let's crunch some estimate numbers just for fun.
Monero has been alive for roughly 550 days and has a supply of 9.8m XMR - and a total market cap of 4.4m$
When Bitcoin was 550 days old (roughly) it had a supply of roughly 4m BTC and a total market cap of 300kusd. The price at that time was 0.08$ (after a moons-shot).
If BTC had the same price as XMR around 550 days we would be looking at more than a magnitude more than it was. Around 0.9usd$ - correlated for total emission).
So all we have to do and it is very easy is to extrapolate those numbers into the future. BTC had its biggest bubble after 4 years and 11 months with supply being around 12mio and price peaking around 1100. That means comparing the 4 years and 11 months in XMR the date is early 2019, where the supply is 17mio. Thusly - a price of 800$/XMR in early 2019.
But wuuuaaaiiitt.....wait a little - it was shown before that xmr prices were
a magnitude above btc prices compared with time. So that's 8000$/XMR in 2019.
Heck. why not just make it 10,000$ in 2019. That's an even number.
There you go that was easy. Speculation indeed.