What is the black sun lmao.

Varying Star Constellations:
This observation was originally made by Aristotle (384-322 BCE), who declared the Earth was round judging from the different constellations one sees while moving away from the equator.



After returning from a trip to Egypt, Aristotle noted that “there are stars seen in Egypt and […] Cyprus which are not seen in the northerly regions.” This phenomenon can only be explained with a round surface, and Aristotle continued and claimed that the sphere of the Earth is “of no great size, for otherwise the effect of so slight a change of place would not be quickly apparent.” (De caelo, 298a2-10)

The farther you go from the equator, the farther the ‘known’ constellations go towards the horizon, and are replaced by different stars. This would not have happened if the world was flat:



Standing in a flat plateau, you look ahead of you towards the horizon. You strain your eyes, then take out your favorite binoculars and stare through them, as far as your eyes (with the help of the binocular lenses) can see.

Then, you climb up the closest tree – the higher the better, just be careful not to drop those binoculars and break their lenses. You then look again, strain your eyes, stare through the binoculars out to the horizon.

The higher up you are the farther you will see. Usually, we tend to relate this to Earthly obstacles, like the fact we have houses or other trees obstructing our vision on the ground, and climbing upwards we have a clear view, but that’s not the true reason. Even if you would have a completely clear plateau with no obstacles between you and the horizon, you would see much farther from greater height than you would on the ground.

This phenomena is caused by the curvature of the Earth as well, and would not happen if the Earth was flat:



The Earth is different from other planets, that much is true. After all, we have life, and we haven’t found any other planets with life (yet). However, there are certain characteristics all planets have, and it will be quite logical to assume that if all planets behave a certain way, or show certain characteristics – specifically if those planets are in different places or were created under different circumstances – our planet is the same.

In other words: If so many planets that were created in different locations and under different circumstances show the same property, it’s likely that our own planet has the same property as well. All of our observations show planets are spherical (and since we know how they’re created, it’s also obvious why they are taking this shape). Unless we have a very good reason to think otherwise (which we don’t), our planet is very likely the same.

In 1610, Galileo Galilei observed the moons of Jupiter rotating around it (click here to see a beautiful video reconstruction of his observations). He described them as small planets orbiting a larger planet – a description (and observation) that was very difficult for the church to accept as it followed a geocentric model where everything was supposed to revolve around the Earth. This observation also showed that the planets (Jupiter, Neptune, and later Venus was observed too) are all spherical, and all orbit the sun.

A flat planet (ours or any other planet) would be such an incredible observation that it would pretty much go against everything we know about how planets form and behave. It would not only change everything we know about planet formation, but also about star formation (as our sun would have to behave quite differently to accustom a “flat earth” theory), what we know of speeds and movements in space (like planets orbits, and the effects of gravity, etc). In short, we don’t just suspect that our planet is spherical. We know it.


The time in New York, at the moment these words are written, is 12:00pm. The sun is in the middle of the sky (though it’s hard to see with the current cloud coverage). In Beijing, where Michael Phelps is likely getting ready for yet another gold medal, it’s 12:00am, midnight, and the sun is nowhere to be found.

In Adelaide, Australia, it is 1:30am. More than 13 hours ahead. There, the sunset is long gone – so much so, that it’s soon going to rise up again in the beginning of a new day. Here’s a list showing what time it is around the world when it is 12:00pm in New York city.



This can only be explained if the world is round, and rotating around its own axis. At a certain point when the sun is shining on one part of the Earth, the opposite side is dark, and vise versa. That allows for time differences and timezones, specifically ones that are larger than 12 hours.

Another point concerning timezones, the sun and flat/spherical Earth: If the sun was a “spotlight” (very directionally located so that light only shines on a specific location) and the world was flat, we would have seen the sun even if it didn’t shine on top of us (as you can see in the drawing below). The same way you can see the light coming out of a spotlight on a stage in the theater, even though you – the crowd – are in the dark. The only way to create two distinctly separate timezones, where there is complete darkness in one while there’s light in the other, is if the world is spherical.

There’s an interesting fact about mass: it attracts things to it. The force of attraction (gravity) between two objects depends on their mass and the distance between them. Simply said, gravity will pull toward the center of mass of the objects. To find the center of mass, you have to examine the object.

Consider a sphere. Since a sphere has a consistent shape, no matter where on it you stand, you have exactly the same amount of sphere under you. Imagine an ant (perhaps the same one from the previous point) walking around on a crystal ball. Assuming the crystal ball is polished, the ant’s only indication of movement would be the fact it’s moving its feet. The scenery (and shape of the surface) would not change at all.



Consider a flat plane. The center of mass of a flat plane is in its center (more or less – if you want to be more accurate, feel free to do the entire [shriek] integration [shriek] process), and the force of gravity will pull a person toward the middle of the plain. That means that if you stand on the edge of the plane, gravity will be pulling you toward the middle, not straight down like you usually experience.

I am quite positive that even for Australians an apple falls downwards, but if you have your doubts, I urge you to try it out – just make sure it’s nothing that can break or hurt you. Just in case gravity is consistent after all.



Further reading about the center of mass and about distribution of mass can be found here. And if you are brave enough to handle some equations (not involving integration), you can learn some more about Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation.

More Methods Throughout History

Abu Rayhan Biruni (sometimes known as “The Father of Geodesy“), has managed to calculate the circumference of the Earth using complex triangulation equations. I couldn’t find the actual calculation, or the method, so I can’t judge it this as a relatively easy “DIY” way to do it, but it’s still worth mentioning. If anyone has any more information about the method used, do post in the comments.
Bedford Level Experiment: At the Bedford river in Norfolk, England. The experiments were done initially in order to prove that the Earth is flat. Though the first results of this experiment seemed to agree with the flat-earth contention, later attempts to repeat this experiment agreed with the fact that the Earth is, in fact, spherical.


Who figured out the Earth is round?
http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question54.html
Earth from Space (from NASA)
http://earth.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/efs/
First Photo from Space 1946: http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exploration/FEATURE-FirstPhoto.html
History Channel’s “History of Space Exploration” interactive website (with Videos):
http://www.history.com/minisite.do?content_type=Minisite_Generic&content_type_id=51655&display_order=5&mini_id=1438
Non stop flight around the world: http://www.didyouknow.cd/aroundtheworld/flight.htm
Foucault Pendulum (in Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
Galileo Galilei (in Wikipedia): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
Galileo’s Observations and Inventions: http://www.2020site.org/galileo/observations.html
Spherical Earth (in Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Earth
The Flat Earth: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/flat/flateart.htm
Lunar Eclipse (in Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_eclipse
History of Geodesy (in Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy

1.Prove it

3.No it's not

4.Prove it

5.Perspective cant limit the distance of sunlight.

6.Prove it

7.Irrelevant

8.No they don't

9.Prove it

Daaamn, you found 2 broken links I guess that destroys my whole argument somehow, right?

I'm willing to bet It's not even your fucking argument, you're just copy-pasting whatever the faggots feed you.

Sourced from: http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za29.htm

During intense solar flairs storms from the sun, NASA re-positions its satellites so that they don't fry. The problem is now solved with these little boogers ...


... which won't need to be re-positioned during storms due to their size - too small for plasma to detect so to raise havoc on the devices.

Fucking goof.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22+black+sun

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22+no+planets

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22+nazi+nasa+lies

Finally, some response from #teamglobe. I was beginning to think the Earth was flat.

Now, a question for #teamflat.

If we accept the rules of perspective, that things look smaller the further away they are, how does the sun work?

I'm wondering about this whole thing:



How come the sun looks the same size, no matter how far away it is, perspectively speaking?

NASA lies.

However, that's proof of nothing. They could be lying about lying, so that later we'd be like "oh, they lied!" but in actual fact the first thing they said was the truth. In that kind of double bluff, we'd eventually end up believing a real lie.

What if NASA is guarding the truth of the globe Earth for that sole reason?  Now that everyone distrusts NASA and globe Earth theory, we're looking for alternatives. We could look forever - are they hiding the truth in plain sight?