heh managed to sign up for the site in the above FAQ link..it states submit an online form to be considered....seems the link for the online form is not coming
up in IE or Firefox....this is hardly encouraging....name and password work...go to this page and fill out form and nada
AND their contact email address (info at kncclassaction.com) is not operational. Are these people serious at all??
I have dealt with lawyers not much. Only one decent sized case. But I can tell you if a law firm did all this then decided they need more info and a new form this far in I would be scared. I mean did they even look at case till just now realize how big of variety of problems there are?
So the lawyers are just now looking into it... just now noticing "Holy crap there are a lot of different situations". And they want paid up front, not doing on a percentage. Not to mention I don't think they said how much you could owe if you lose.
I wish all well that do this but it would scare the heck out of me.
yeah this is where I got stuck in the mud.....
1) The fact that the Swedish authorities can get a 'bond' from you in advance along with the fact I do not see any answer from them on how deep a hole you could
be in if you lose to KNC as unlikely as that seems to be I admit......and/or can say if KNC wins can they counter sue you/group action back if they were to win in court
on their reputation (I'm sure they have all my 'lovely' little posts of my 'viewpoint' on their forums)
2) The fact from what I can tell they can only give enough info to form a decent opinion on if suing KNC is a wise move or not (ie they have some kinda case/strategy) until
AFTER you pay them the retainer ...take the above risks.....in order to look at it all and then in 20/20 hindsight go 'uh oh' that is my cost on a LOSS (faints)
3) The fact I have contacted them 3 times on my Titan 1st batch order on the grounds of 1) Late delivery Nov 6th 2) firmware did not do alts as advertised first couple
months on top of the titan being late and the FUD they put out after the fact changing www pages and keeping old dates to say it was ORIGINALLY ONLY to be
an LTC miner so the above firmware issue did not apply 3) the usual no refund even thou should have got one argument everyone will use 4) The fact that in my
particular case have 2 cubes with 2 dead die each that they refused to RMA saying it was good enough 5) Their admission form day one that the first batch of Titan asic chips were 'not up to par and substandard' but the risk was our own ..the consumers in that it was 'experimental equipment'
Again.....not feeling a lot of love at the Titan end of things with this...at least in a preliminary give me some info on what is what sense.
Still think with SOME of the above applied to Neptunes with the added fact that Neptune owners really got played like a fiddle by KNC ..in that they stalled their
equip to fill their data hall...the long stall on bonus neputunes till worthless and more ...the Neptune owners in my view have a much better shot then my Titan
in this case
and again from what I know the cases are grouped together but again from what I understand each case within the class action is INDIVIDUAL under swedish law
which brings me back to my last concern that the class action will work find for Neptune owners...but with only say 50 cases in the class action you really think
the other side is not gonna 'cherry pick" cases .....ie my case is not as good..ie could i still LOSE even thou others in the class action with different equipment win?
anyway don't jump on me too hard but hard to know what is what IF THEY NEVER REPLY WITH AN EMAIL even one that says to call them directly which I would do
so my take so far is that they have read my emails and the Titan orders as they exist above just don't have enough 'weight' for them to pursue us to join
whatever hopefully I am incorrect on the above and someone here who HAS gotten a reply and IS a Titan order can set me straight
