If bitcoin gets into million(s) and most of WO regulars are still around, i think the best bang for the money would be to seek life extension procedures.
More years = more chances to develop Alzheimer's.
No thanks.They really need to solve that one first.
You don't need to fight Alzheimer's if it never develops.
In other words-organs and tissues that are rejuvenated (less age functionally than the clock shows) are less prone to disease.
Aging is a fundamental condition, Alzheimer's is a consequence of an aged brain tissue (typically).
When I was talking about fighting aging, I was not talking about being 80 perpetually. That would be nonsensical.
How about 40 or even earlier?
Its feasible for a 20 year old rich person to age slower. and I would say it is worthwhile.
But at 65 I am looking to age backwards not slower.
Of course, but this is what would make such potential treatment
insanely valuable.
As far as bitcoin is concerned, I am a bit alarmed that M. Saylor keeps getting deeper in debt to buy bitcoin.
He should have done it earlier, imho.
Leverage would make his ownership more tenuous and potentially prone to margin calls at the inopportune time.
