Bitcoin's Lightning Labs Raises $70 Million, Announces Taro Stablecoin Protocol
https://decrypt.co/96921/bitcoin-lightning-labs-raises-70-million-taro-stablecoin-protocol

the noon wall report

dyor

ascending channel...not great
1h


or it could be we just haven't broke out of this bull flag
4h

stronghands

In several ways, I agree with points that you are making, but several of your points are phrased in ways that are confusing to me, because even though I consider incentives behind bitcoin mining to be a kind of moving dynamic – that will adjust to changes in technology, BTC price legislative factors and other factors such as number of other miners, I still find some of your explanation to be problematic because I cannot really tell if you are suggesting that miners are responding to BTC price or causing the BTC price to change, and also the part about legislators being able to control aspects of mining seems to be playing into what they want to do, but not so much describing what they are able to accomplish. 

Of course, I am not going to be saying anything that you do not know, but one of the interesting  dynamics of bitcoin is that it both assumes selfish behavior and it assumes bad actors, so in some sense bitcoin has some abilities to adjust to bad actors – including the difficulty adjustment, but also if legislators/governments put impediments onto bitcoin, then the mining and perhaps even use cases for bitcoin will likely move to less hostile jurisdictions, so part of the dynamics of having value imbedded into the coin would be that to engage in certain kinds of attacks against the network, the attacker has to engage in behavior that attacks himself….so I am bothered about whether that is fairly described as a “closed loop” or a self correction mechanism that you seem to be hinting at.. and for sure the dynamics are going to change and move in accordance with where some of the attacks might be made – and hopefully be able to survive in the end… so yeah, merely having a stake in the system is not enough to control the system, either… and maybe I am just bothered by a kind of seeming assumption that legislators might be able to be successful without having to gain widespread control in a variety of jurisdictions – which seems really difficult to achieve because some legislators are already getting on the bitcoin train and are likely to continue to get on the bitcoin train rather than attacking it (if they know what is for their own good)….

But one thing about bitcoin is that there is no coercion… Legislators, financial institutions, status quo rich, can each decide whether to jump on the bitcoin train, fight against bitcoin or to remain neutral, and with the passage of time, we will find out how their decisions are playing out, and even if they do not jump on board in 2014, or in 2018 or in 2021 or in 2025, there is nothing stopping them from jumping on board later, even if the train has gone further up the hill and they might have to jump on the more luxury version rather than the previously clunky version.

Ukraine’s General Staff: 18,500 Russian soldiers killed during invasion. Russian troops have also lost 676 tanks, 1,858 armored fighting vehicles, 332 artillery pieces, 107 multiple rocket launchers, 55 surface-to-air missiles, 150 jets, 134 helicopters, 7 ships, 76 fuel tanks, 94 drones, and 4 ballistic missile systems, the General Staff said on April 5.

A longer video of an ambush with Ukraines own Stugna-P.  They check out the column and when they see a TOS-1 Thermobaric artillery also known as  Borotino, they shoot. Apparently the first shot misses due to winds or something shaking the tripod, and the shooter gets, shall we say, a bit irritated, "suka pederasti blyat".
When the war is over  Stugna-P is gonna be a huge export succes me thinks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PfOwUp_dos&ab_channel=%23BABYLON%2713

Not everything is small infantry units ambushing, heres a short clip of classic tank warfare over open fields, Canadian volontaires participated. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=536050051278901&extid=CL-UNK-UNK-UNK-AN_GK0T-GK1C&ref=sharing

+1. Mining is the only way to secure the network which is active, passive being the code itself which is on blockchain.

Not at all. I wish for everybody the best - including the cuntonians.
But there are different levels of “love”. Allow me to elaborate.

I love nullius, Lauda and Torgue for example, and anyone else who does his own diligence, calls out the liars, and values uncensored free speech.
I can’t say the same for suchmoon (bitcointalk’s own “Fauci”) even if blame them both for human killing/genocide.
That doesn’t mean I would like to see Fauci hang in the Times square. On the contrary, I will defend his right to live as everybody else.
If that isn’t - indirect -  real love, then what is it?



True that. My swearing and insulting is not to condemn, but rather to try and balance things out.



Love is the most FORGOTTEN part of humanity, all thanks to TV and MSM propaganda.

---

Indeed, but that’s not what I said. Read it again you fuck.



It sucks to be you!



I will, can you fuck off for me now?

---

I guess you didn’t pick up my suggestion. Hmmm.
Why do you insist on telling us that? [ +2 BoD]



How about a divine human signal to start fucking off? [+3 BoD]

---

+1 WO’s merit.
Watching chart buddy post in his new avatar, absolutely gives me the giggles - every single time. Thank you for that.

---

+1 WO’s merit.
That said, it does remind me of the NFT fuckery, only on Bitcoin instead of the prime shitcoin.
Will have to look into it further.

---

You can have the cup, I want the sweetie.
+1 WO’s merit.

---

Goodnight, good morning and good evening.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2euqyXXjmAo

I understand (...i think), which let's me see many of your posts here in a slighty different light now.
To your question: It's respect for life, at least. To keep it short and not make it a love-only discussion: Love doesn't value. Hate, fear, grudge and the likes are just examples for states defined by complete absence of love.
Can't say too much about credibility or authenticity of (long-time) forum members, but it's not that important to me either, because i'm mainly here to discuss, gather and share knowledge, as well as not to forget the fun. I always hated to debate with Nully, as you might have noticed sometimes, but he seemed to be quite noble and trustworthy. One of the few i'd enjoy to read again from in these here parts.


Still seems a lil unbalanced to me, i mean quantitatively*. Does it make you feel good? If not, why keep doing it?
(*does this term even exist? But you know what i mean, no?)


I recon we are both right in this point.
MSM drives fear, massively. I gave up watching TV a good decade ago. For reasons.


I wonder if i was the only one thinking the same. Most certainly not