including when she said NFT should be used reasonably?
Isn't that as subjective as what is spam?
-I refer to her personal opinion, only in this small cut that I linked,>
.... and I don't find the rest of the video so interesting,.. not the professional/official opinion where she acts, well, this type of opinion of hers appears to be personal and not official opinion, she herself knows that there is no possibility of implementing it, even knowing that it solves the problems, just like those of this official opinion of hers that you mentioned..., no, I don't agree.
-========================#========================-
-I don't know that there is tralala, and so many other reasons, this reason for this note on October 10....
THIS IS AN ANNOUNCEMENT FOR THE MSCI GLOBAL STANDARD INDEXES
EXTENSION OF THE CONSULTATION ON DIGITAL ASSET TREASURY COMPANIES
MSCI announced today an extension of its ongoing consultation with the investment community on the appropriate treatment of companies whose primary business involves Bitcoin or other digital asset treasury activities - including cases where capital-raising activities are primarily used to fund digital asset accumulation - within the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes.
As part of the consultation so far, some market participants noted that such companies may exhibit characteristics similar to investment funds, which are currently not eligible for index inclusion. Accordingly, MSCI proposes to exclude from the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes companies whose digital asset holdings represent 50% or more of their total assets.
MSCI welcomes feedback from market participants on the eligibility of such companies and the proposed 50% asset-based threshold. MSCI also invites input on whether additional parameters should be considered - for example, whether a company defines itself as a digital asset treasury company or has raised capital primarily to accumulate digital assets, in addition to the asset-based criterion.
-The consultation will remain open until December 31, 2025, and the final conclusions will be announced by January 15, 2026. MSCI proposes that any resulting changes would be implemented as part of the February 2026 Index Review.
Based on an initial analysis of available data sources, MSCI is sharing a preliminary list of potentially impacted securities meeting the proposed criteria within the MSCI All Cap Index universe. MSCI will continue to review data sources and refine the impact assessment if warranted.
MSCI will continue to not implement increases to the Number of Shares (NOS), Foreign Inclusion Factor (FIF), or Domestic Inclusion Factor (DIF) for METAPLANET and CAPITAL B, and will defer the implementation of any size-segment migrations for these securities as part of the November 2025 Index Review. Such treatment will also apply to other index constituents included in the preliminary list of impacted securities.
Non-index constituents included on the impacted list will not be considered for inclusion in the MSCI All Cap Index as part of the November 2025 Index Review.
THIS IS AN ANNOUNCEMENT FOR THE MSCI GLOBAL STANDARD INDEXES
End of announcement.
Further announcements may occur as needed.
---
JPMorgan warns of MicroStrategy delisting risk from major equity indices
MicroStrategy (now Strategy), the worlds largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, is facing its most consequential structural risk since Michael Saylor began transforming the software firm into a leveraged Bitcoin vehicle five years ago.
The warning comes from a new JPMorgan note that says the company may be removed from major equity indices including the MSCI USA Index.
...
...in short, this JPMorgan gang, is tough!
