I have another problem. When I issue a number of property tokens for a new project and would like to join them to the main aggregated token when actual construction is completed it looks like M&A process for two companies. Therefore I need to decrease CCR to provide the same price.
Not sure I understood your concern, anything you'd like to see clarified on Bancor's pricing algorithm?
That is a naive position to take, unless the team actually delivers on the decentralized part. How many times do they need to be reminded that third-parties are security loopholes? Does the team still think having a 'master key' is the right approach? Where is the public statement admitting they were wrong, apologizing, and updating their contracts so that such incidents cannot happen in the future?
This is not about supporting the project or not. This is about doing the right thing. Clearly the Bancor team isn't doing that, unless I missed an announcement somewhere. This hack would not be possible if the team took Security 101 precautions in their smart contracts and not have the ability for a single address to change literally everything.
What's the post mortem for how the keys were compromised?
We can assure you that the Team does take security seriously and that they're actively looking regarding what has happened. Soon enough, once there's more information, you'll hear further.
