Cof...cof...new ATH 
http://178.254.23.111/~pub/masternode_count.png

Bitwala has the same exchange rate of Spectrocoin, as they stated on the web, so seems expensive too.

Anyone know the wirex one?

Thats a big move.

I kind of agree here:- cost too high because of high exchange charges ect,
however the platform (as advertised/used) is very mainstream and usefull

But from what I see the Max upper usage limit on this and i expect others similar is low for the "unverified" user (UK Max lifetime load£2500)
these guys and others need to look at raising that upper limit ,,,

Does'nt mean I would'nt use this

EDIT
[Do you recon they are locked down on that Max by Govevment stuff]

Are they supporting InstandSend for Debit Card top-ups then ?

Correct me if I'm wrong here. Doesn't the recent compliance integration disqualify Dash as an anonymous crypto?

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/interview-dash-and-coinfirm-on-digital-currency-compliance-partnership-1475867943

There's no value in making crypto complaint when the principal design is peer-to-peer. This goes against the core fundamentals on which bitcoin was founded. Why would someone want to use crypto that is compliant when they can use fiat currency that is far more stable as a measure of value and accepted in more places.. Bitcoin adoption and cryptocurrency in general is a movement to replace the existing system with a crypto economy not comply with regulations made for financial institutions. The goal is to get merchants and customers using crypto not some regulated fiat replacement or card that interfaces with existing clearing house infrastructure. Apparently the people working on this coin didn't read the first sentence of Satoshi's white paper..

"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution."

- Satoshi Nakamoto,
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Let me correct you by quoting from the very article you are referring to   : https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/interview-dash-and-coinfirm-on-digital-currency-compliance-partnership-1475867943



Basicly it opens the door for more mainstream business customers while still providing privacy services to those customers that need it. The reason Dash can make this work is because Dash privacy elements that are integrated at core protocol are of optional nature. Users choose to have privacy with Dash or not.    

Crypto doesn't need to be propelled into anything.. Slow and steady wins the race. Every day more and more people are being introduced to cryptocurrency. Bank card integration is a step backwards because it deals with clearing houses and third parties when the principal is peer-to-peer. If you think that debit cards are a step forward then you are sadly mistaken. One cannot be anonymous and still comply with AML/KYC. It's an oxymoron. "KYC" is Know your Customer.. That is the completely contradictory to being anonymous. It's like walking into a store to buy something with cash and the clerk asks for ID. Therefore this cannot be digital cash more like KYC coin.

The direction Dash is a far cry from its initial design. Keep going down the road of compliance and risk disqualify it as a peer-to-peer currency, let alone an anonymous one.


Name one major vendor that requires compliance by a government to integrate a cryptocurrency.


Opens the door for what mainstream businesses? Microsoft and countless other mainstream businesses accept bitcoin and do not have to comply with anything other than tax reporting for their profits and losses.

What this does "open the door" to is unnecessary regulation of cryptocurrencies. Not mandated by any government to date. It's a slippery slope Dash is traveling and one that investors should think twice before supporting. But I digress, I leave you to complying with vapor compliance.

Every banking institution in the US?