I got really disappointed after all that I was hoping to see with France to the final stage. It was embarrassing how Spain humbled the French team with a cleansheet defeat of 2 goals which should have being 3 goals if it wasn't for an offside line that caught Yamal in that moment. There was nothing dreadful about France in that game and it was unlike anything about them in this World Cup. Unfortunately, anything about a repeat of the previous World Cup final is now out of the equation, sadly France would be playing for the third place.

With what quality of football the Spanish team displayed against France am tempted to put my bet on them to win when they go against Argentina in the final game.

Sometimes I see there are some reasonable points in such conspiracy theory, for example the foul of Messi against Spence after that Argentina scored a winning goal. I generally agree that Argentina played better and deserved to this win and even without that mild foul, that goal, they would have been able to score another goal and win this match. Because England played very cowardly, not humbly or carefully, in this semi final match.

However, why VAR did not check that situation is a big myth especially Spence shown his pain quickly after that foul. If it is not Messi and Argentina, perhaps VAR would have checked that situation and refused the goal already.

In as much as i don't want to believe that there is any sort of favoritism by FIFA for the 2026 tournament but if we can be very sincere with ourselves, you'll agree that, most f the Argentina games seemed almost not pure with some obvious irregularities but the truth is that, there is nothing anyone can do about it and i don't know why i'm really eager to watch the 3rd place match because i want to pay so much attentions to the match and see if any silly things will be observed but i also hope not and i wish any of the teams for the final best of luck because they are both very strong and i wouldn't be watching the game in support of any of the team but rather for the fun of the game and to support anyone playing a sweet and good game. 

Your words have enough logic and are convincing. But you have to admit that Argentina have a lot of advantages in several matches. I believe without a doubt, Argentina players play very well and can be called the best team now. But considering other teams not all teams can play well. Because this has been considered while scheduling the matches. And after coming to the round of 16, the strongest teams faced each other. Yes in this case the best two teams are in the final. But hopefully, what happened with Argentina, those bias issues won't happen in the finals through FIFA.

🔥 Today is an important date in Bitcoin history!


💲 On every historical date — go to the Rewards Center and claim a no-deposit bonus in SATS with no wagering.

In my opinion, we should look at the two issue separately. One is whether Argentina really deserved to win? And the other is how consistent the refereeing was. In my opinion Argentina came back as a worthy team. Because England became much more defensive after taking lead in the match. However I will strongly criticize Tuchel's tactical changes. In my opinion his tactics created pressure instead of trying to finish the match.

I admit that people are even asking question about Messi-Spence incident. Fierce debate that is going on at local and international level about that footage has become a huge topic of discussion. Many are wondering whether there was actually enough of a push to be a foul! And opinion on this are very different.

In my opinion the main criticism is not about whether the goal was legal or not. But rather about the fact that the VAR referee was not given the opportunity to review it on field despite this state of controversy. At the same time there is a lot of edited and AI generated image circulating on social media. Therefore we should be very careful before accepting any viral screenshot as accurate evidence or testimony.

You actually tried as you ended up securing the 50th position in the tournament, when I started the tournament I started with few SATS I accumulated and I secured 36 position from Tuesday, but before the tournament ended I think I was dropped 52 position and there's no any rewards for me, then I was out of SATS, so last week I decided to deposit a small amounts from my weekly pay through a Bitcoin lightening network, luckily I later secured 47th position and I recieved my reward. Which I promise myself this week to be among the top 20th or more......it's just a gradual process and I will advice every that's joining the tournament newly should start with a little big sats and play a game he know how to play in order to go far along the line.

There will always be sides that would claim corruption, that is just the way it is. If England won and Argentina lost, then we would have seen Argentinians and their fans would be claiming there were referee issues, because it was the reverse, there weren't. Plus, Argentina won last time, so there is an extra hatred towards them, not really something that would be all that complicated considering how we are dealing with all of this. It's very normal to see something like this, because they are winners.

It is quite hard to tell what is a real referee decision and what is just negative opinion from fans. Maybe it would be fairer to look at foul statistics in an objective way, not only feelings because almost every big tournament has a team accused of being favored by referees.
Messi always gets attention, win or lose. If Argentina becomes champion again, some fans might stay suspicious just because they dislike a team that keeps winning, not because something is really wrong.