What isn't clear to you? Next to each option, there’s a small circle with a letter in it, an info icon. Just hover your cursor over it, and you’ll see that USDT with the red logo is TRC20, while the one with the gray logo is ERC20. Simply select the network you need and make your deposit.

I would go with Sabalenka’s opponent even if she looks almost unstoppable right now. For the other game, I’m still going with Coco Gauff because of her consistency. Rybakina has already been announced as the new WTA No. 1, and that will certainly inspire her even more, but I still wouldn’t let that stop me from fading her here.

I also don’t really like the H2H stats for Sabalenka vs Pegula since Sabalenka leads by a huge margin, **9–4 overall**, but I still like fading Sabalenka in this match.

A casino having a scam accusation is not a problem, both legit casinos are going to have accusation threads against them, the problem is how these accusations are handled, some casinos don't bother responding, while some try to twist the rules to avoid paying when guilty of the accusation, kind of behavior that warrants a negative tag on the casino's reputation.

A casino trying to maintain its reputation will eventually dig deep into the accusation, conduct investigations, and accept its wrong, while we should also note that not everyone creating accusation threads is on the right, some gamblers make the wrong call.

🎵 Could You Recognize Your Favorite Slot With Your Eyes Closed?

Every slot has its own atmosphere, but sometimes it’s the music that makes a game stick in your memory.
A calm soundtrack during regular spins, the tension building when the second scatter lands, and that sudden change in music when the bonus round finally kicks in. Sometimes, before anything even appears on the screen, you already know from the sound alone: something’s happening. 🎰
And then there are those slots whose music gets stuck in your head for the rest of the day. 😄

Do you usually play with the sound on, or do you mute it and put on your own music instead? 🎧👇

I don't frankly see it the way you do. Guess any casino outlaw your account.
That doesn't mean you can merely accept they have adequately reviewed all your data and that their conclusion is undoubtedly accurate.

It is not as simple as assuming casino is at fault and its reputation will suffer just because any random player lodges complaint. I first want to see exactly which rule they are invoking and whether there is sufficient evidence to support their claim. Often, decision might be made by provider, in which case casino is not necessarily held accountable. If player consider decision made by casino or provider to be incorrect then it must be determined whether he was given opportunity to challenge it.

Because mistake could lie with casino, or it could be player's fault. Therefore it is not right to reach any conclusion based solely on casino's reputation.

What many people consider before deciding to finally bet a game is the odd. The odd for Arsenal winning that match was extremely low and many people will not consider it to be worth the risk hence the reason people explore other other options that gives higher odds like Totals, first half result and others that have better odds. Those that played Totals yesterday lost because Arsenal couldn't score many goals in that match and that was a little disappointing.  Napoli knew that if they come out to play Arsenal, they would concede so many goals so they rather play defensive game which was the reason there was only one goal in the match.

I don't think he is actually saying that the reports collected by a reputed member here in the forum is inaccurate.  The main issue here is not to accept all reports as the final result, but rather it is about reading the details behind each of the reports.

Even with a well organised report there may be information which must be understood in its correct context.  I believe it's helpful to read the actual evidence, and also to see how the casino answered each of the mentioned problems, rather than simply believing or dismissing the whole report.

Thanks didn't notice that ⓘ so i wasn't sure if it was the right thing. I mean Almost deposit on the wrong thing since I usually see the green logo on TRC20. Good thing I asked! Thanks again!



I always getting this error everytime I loging using my email, but I still able to login on the account even though there was an error being shown.



Yeah, Thanks wasn't able to see the  ⓘ , so I wasn't sure of it. I mean, there was no harm in asking. Just like what I said, I almost made the wrong deposit, so good thing I asked first. 

Did anyone noticed this on the login screen? I find it funny haha!



Sabalenka might dominate on this one but, I've picked Pegula with that over 11.5 games. I don't want to bet on the match winner, it's hard to decide if I'd go with the winner but, this is what I have chosen. Good luck to both of them.

Unfortunately, Sabalenka won in just 2 sets against Pegula. Perhaps it was extra motivation for her to win and try to get back number 1 set. No fading this time for Sabalenka, as he is focus on this game scores were 7-5, 6.2.

@bhadz - Pegula was only able to score 7 points in this match. She was truly outclassed and dominated by Sabalenka.

On the other semis, Coco Gauff leads, 1 set, they are playing in the second set and this time, it's looks very close as Rybakina needs this one to stay alive. 4-4, Rybakina serving.