Wouldn't there be conflict of interest between GEMZ holders and Magma in future?
How so? Magma gets an ownership stake in the Getgems company, which will get revenue from a cut of the advertisisng on the Gems network. At least presumably, the company won't pull in a lot of revenue unless GEMZ are bought by advertisers to advertise on the network. Advertisers have to buy GEMZ to advertise anything on the network.
What possible conflict of interest do you see?
For example, from GEMZ holders point of view, would'nt we want to see multiple advertising platforms to compete each other, not only advertising platform but also any future platforms like music, video distribution, etc, no? GEMS was supposed to be open sourced and decentralized, right? I know the future is not crystal clear but don't we want to know that the latest business model GEMS proposed to Magma?