haha ^^
great to see you in this thread! 

As long as you keep repeating that you expect FB and Whatstheapp like numbers I'll keep repeating you won't so people aren't tricked into thinking they just bought 10% of FB. NXTTY IS a good comparison to see how well a chat crypto currency might catch on. A few weeks ago they were saying they were going to gets millions of downloads but they haven't managed past 5,000. Just keeping a balanced head and keeping it real as the usual ICO delirium sets in.

Dude you got their apps on your website as your target under the heading 'Value'  


And if you want to start defending your app, defend this. How do you expect an app to succeed these days where their are hundreds of chat apps with new ones coming everyday when you don't even have photo sharing! Cause photo sharing will be painfully slow?

I dont know why fulcare keeps repeating himself, nxtty is absoluttely horrible, fulcare is such a noob in understanding business models. No app exists that is innovative like gems

The advantage is that we are building a social messaging app based on attention economy with a built in wallet. This allows anyone to have a public hashtag but the spam is still under control. This opens a lot of interesting use cases for users wanting your attention and are willing to pay you directly. (With LinkedIn you pay the company to send unsolicited messages to users. In Tinder you can’t send unsolicited messages to girls you like even if you wanted to. In Instagram you can’t get the celebrities attention because their hashtag is being “spammed”. In Gems you will be able to do all these things if you pay the right price in gems. The cost to send such an unsolicited
message is dependent on the relative popularity of the recipient using a bidding system commonly employed by Google.

We are in alpha development, we will have photo sharing and it will be super fast

I'm in,
Just the koinify.com does not load smoothly!  

There are two main concerns with a centralized system.

The first concern is anonymity and privacy of Gems users. Centralized systems are more prone to be monitored by external entities - for example, a government agency with a warrant for access to our servers. This concern is actually not specific to centralized systems and a good security policy assumes that all traffic is always being monitored by external entities - even if the network is completely decentralized.

The Gems network operates under this assumption. Secure messages via Gems are encrypted client-client. This means that these messages cannot be monitored by anyone except the two members of the conversation. This includes anyone listening in on the traffic transmitted by the mobile devices and this even includes the server itself. In other words, this means that the servers cannot decrypt the content of these messages. In any case, the encrypted messages are only held by the server in the short time until delivery, so history of the entire (encrypted) conversation is never stored anywhere except on the mobile device itself.

The second concern is robustness of the network and the ability to freely and openly scale the network in the hands of third parties. In the Gems ecosystem, this means third parties will be able to add their own server nodes. Since server nodes can't access the content of secure messages, there is no security concern with adding nodes. This can roughly be compared to how third party routers in the Internet route your traffic to its destination.

The Gems message routing protocol is based on an open source framework (SignalR). It was designed to support multiple distributed nodes in order to support massive scale (a single server will never be able to support millions of users). We plan to open source the Gems message routing protocol and allow third parties to add new server nodes to the network. Mobile clients will be able to connect to these nodes and send messages through them just like with the original Gems servers.

Done. Thanks for the reminder!

Better you leave when you don't understand what is difference between high quality product and a junky app.