When I posted the maths of the magic squares, I showed that maths is the universal language, even though I knew others knew this. I am at least twice the age you estimate, and the Kybalion in my opinion is just one book that attempts to describe the events of the bible in simple scientific, provable facts barring one, which I refer folks to in the guis of hidden energies of the earth. I only quoted from the Kybalion, never used it.

If I had the skills I have, before churches were built, I'd be called more than an alchemist (i do know how to make an ever burning lamp, brass, bitumen (miss a few ingredients intentionally)) as I go on a set of decks and control THOUSANDS of minds at once, they know I do it, and they love it. They dance to it, and I get laid afterwards. My electrical knowledge leaves you standing, in this I am a scientist, so yeah, I guess I am an alchemist, since I know which chemicals NOT to blend.

Have I read the emerald tablets? At one point, every day like some read a bible, not only that, I've re-written it, and comes in the form of an audio book that I created for a blind friend. I have worked in esoteric fields, I have read every esoteric book available online, previous to the last few years, the older the better.. If ya wanna attack an aquarian in the age of aquarius keep in mind that the diety we seek evidence of is more likely to back me up for the next 26.000 years. Have you ever known an aquarian to toe the line, to do what they're told, to follow old, when they ARE the creators of origionality in ways you could not fathom? They are not only the ORIGIONATORS, and hence akin to a creator, something you are incapable of as you attack despite my evidence that god was required to feed his kid. But you only choose to see what you wanna see, you have to look with better eyes..

Edt: And when I seem to be attacking, keep in mind I am individual, here on my own, and back no-one up, since I have been, Am, and always will be on my own in this reality, and speak for myself using the plethora of information this planet can offer. As for knockin folks over the head with it, dont take my word for it, read a bit more like I did, from books, not the internet. I only react to percieved attacks. Have I attacked ?

The only reason I dont just lay it down is because I gotta be gentle with some o em pussyyyyyyy's...

Edit: The only reason folks find it difficult to twist me to their way of thinking is a very un-usual aquarian trait.. I never pick side's, I like to remain a man in the middle, like a peacekeeper. When my son asked what football team I support, I said Scotland, even though it's a crap team.. Why Scotland, dad, and not a scottish team? For then we are not devided, my son. So when one sect of religion gangs up on a soul son, they should prepare for more than war.. they should prepare for the age of aquarius, the only people clever enough to create the third choice of the two offered, and go that way.. cya..

Ps, incidently, I was born in '69 hahaha

That's not the point
The fact that everything has a cause (true or false) doesn't imply the fact that everything has a meaning/reason

Perhaps not, but these principles are analogous.

Try to understand what the author of that quote is saying; he is a profound and very objective thinker.

He said a lot of profound things, only a few of which are found here:
http://kevincarmody.com/math/goedel.html

So... The Superiority Complex emerges in it's full glory for all to see. Keep on keeping on brother. You're so much more than I.

Get it right dick (yup, another foreskin puller who dont believe, so attacks those who try to), I have no superior complex, and I'll bet you 100 btc right now that I have the actual answer the OP seeks, if you dont have 100 btc, fuck off back to school. YOU cant afford to have a conversation with me, especially when you refuse the evidence.

Where is YOUR scientific proof of god? If you dont believe, fuck off to the alcoholic pc section designed entirely for clueless cunts like you.

100btc for THE definative answer, the fee is a disclosure fee, take it or leave it.. bet you CANT (using the excuse you wont) pay for the answer you seek, or you would not be reading my junk, idiot!!!!!

And the reason I attack is cause your that dumb you think I'm your brother, stop LYING, and go get a fuckin brain.

Edit: remix of above sentence: The reason I attack you is your that dumb you believe that I am your brother, despite me writing in this thread my mother is dead, making me having a brother SCIENTIFICALLY impossible, stop trying to convince people of your delusions by lying in the hope your kindred will jump in to back YOU up, do I look like your brother? If so, forgive me.. now here's your straight jacket, there's the fuckin door, use it.

Oh, and if it appear's to you I have a superior complex, you are mistaken.. you were told to read books, NOT pdf's or html. It's not my fault I have a superior Scottish education to your fuckin tribal nonsense.. I bet the only reason you dance around the fire is cause you've yet to learn not to stand on hot embers.

Ps, that 100 btc for the definitive answer is offered to all, not that we need it.. but it's worth paying.

The first proof for the existence of God is the existence of the universe and everything therein.

The universe is a big machine. It is a highly complex machine. No machine ever existed without a Machine Maker. Whatever or Whoever the Machine Maker is, He is greater by far than mankind. By definition of the word "god," the Machine Maker is God.

----------

The second proof for the existence of God is, there is no pure random. Everything operates by cause and effect, action and reaction. A leaf blowing this way and that in the wind, does so according to the actions of wind molecules on it. The wind molecules act according to other wind molecules that are acting on them. All act according to the waves/particles of heat energy from the sun acting on them all.

Cause and effect goes all the way back to the beginning. Whatever was the Great First Cause was the only thing that had random in it. THAT random produced all the complexities of the universe that we see today, through the cause and effect, the action and reaction that followed.

The thing that people call random and probability is all based on the ignorance of the people. Nobody can follow all the actions of wind molecules on a leaf. People might be able to follow enough of the actions to make a good guess about how the leaf might move. This is the random that the people use. This is the only probability that exists. It is born of the ignorance of the people. There is no true, pure random.

The point is, whatever the Great First Cause is, be it the Big Bang, or be it the God of the Bible, or anything else, it is EXTREMELY God beyond anything we can envision God to be, simply because of the complexity it set up in the beginning, complexity that exists through cause and effect right down to the present.

----------

The third proof for the existence of God lies in the fact that there are billions of people around the world who believe there is a god. All science exists outside of the minds of scientists. A little of it resides in scientific languages (math and writing and speaking) within the minds of scientists. Because of the existence in the minds, the evidence for God in the minds of the people is as valid as any other proof. Even many scientists believe that God exists.

The longer the earth has existed, the longer God has existed in the minds of the people. God is there. He can't be removed from the minds of the people. He might be dulled somewhat, but He can't be removed. He exists.

But is there scientific proof that Satoshi exists?

Um, no.. that's like saying the cloud exists.. ffs, it's nowt more than someone else's hard-drive.

1) The "no machine without a maker" argument is plausible, but in my opinion it's a fairly weak argument on its own.  It certainly isn't proof.

2) Actually, his point here is fairly accurate.  Chance is essentially another word for unknown causation.  Randomness is practically meaningful to describe certain events, but hardly accurate.  For example, if I flip a coin, you might say there is a 50% chance the coin will land on tails.  In reality, there is 100% certainty that the coin will land on tails given certain conditions (e.g. Height of the flip, force used, wind currents, angle of the flip, slope of the landing surface, etc.  But, in a coin flip, there's no time to take into account all these factors to arrive at a conclusion.  So, practically speaking, we describe the result in terms of probabilities.

3) The Flying Spaghetti Monster argument is a priori invalid, and is a terrible argument against the existence of God.  This is obvious as the FSM is described as only having the characteristics of a polytheistic god and not a monotheistic one.  As a result, this argument is dead on arrival.  Atheists really do themselves a horrible disservice by wielding this argument because it essentially demonstrates that they did not think for themselves about this issue.  The FSM is a very bad, bandwagon argument against the existence of God.

I cant tell if you really are delusional, or trying to be sarcastic.  I cant take anything you say serious dude