Sorry nothing of that is evidence. As I said itcan be explained thru evolution and biologi
A supreme being that creates universes is much more complex than anything in nature.
If a creature like that can pop up from nothing surley the universe can

So many technically useless points regarding GOD.. hmm..

"Let me get this right. You're searching for scientific evidence of a hypothesis that cannot be tested. -
That's incredibly naive."

I would reply: GOD is not hypothetical, the fact we speak of him wether alive or dead, past or present, is evidence of the image of the diety existing. We all create 'that' image of whatever it is we are talking about, sharing the same reality, with each other, proving (if he exists lol) he does.

Yes you are indeed..

God IS hypothetical.

Granted; god is a hypothesis shared by many, but it's a hypothesis nonetheless.

Also you refer to god as "he", so I feel you are succumbing to gender bias and anthropomorphism (you allude to god being a person, a male one at that). If this hypothetical god were to exist then I think the correct description would be "it" or simply stop at "god".

Dry debate talk aside, here's some music I hobby wrote some years back, your writings on sound and vibration reminded me of it, the track is called "cymatics":

https://www.cortex7.net/music/cymatics.mp3

The track uses a voice sample of Dr Peter Guy Manners:
http://www.drpeterguymanners.com/

You are sooo good (capable and understanding).

Thermite is wonderful stuff. Many of the various alloys had their start in people playing with thermite with small amounts of other metals mixed in.

Yet, if you want proof that thermite is wonderful, you better mix the aluminum powder and rust powder in the proper ratios. If you don't, you just might wind up in the hospital (if you live, that is). Would that be proof enough for you (not you, Decksperiment, those others who are doubters)?


In the strict sense, God is hypothetical to people who haven't met Him, or to people who don't recognize that they have met Him.

Evidence is NOT proof. That's why we need faith. Same as the evolutionists need faith to believe that something as impossible as evolution might even have a chance of existing.

ALL people live by faith to some extent. Much (most?) of the time faith produces good results. The people of Hiroshima in WWII overextended their faith, and then they were gone, something that their faith hadn't taken into account.

Consider the stranger you meet in the bar (or wherever). How do you know that this stranger isn't going to harm you? You don't in the strict sense. You take him/her on faith, simply by sitting down to buy your drink.

BITCOINtalk.org or WHATEVERtalk.org?

I believe in God, science or not cience, proof or not proof.

Somewhere in this thread there IS evidence of god, and it outways the need for scientific proof.

The closest you'll come to it where a lab experiment can be conducted in order to prove the results, is the story of the hat. No scientific instruments required, since the 'proof ' would become the EVIDENCE you receive upon completion of the 'lab experiment'

Now if you'd like to pay me to show you in any laboratory of your choice, I will gladly prove that this 'diety' or false idol of higher intelligence.. nah..

I can prove god exists. You cant.

Now let's say you could afford to pay me to prove the existance of what people will accept as proof of god, would you?

I was actually trying to be friendly in a roundabout way.

But at least you entertained me, and probably others:

LAUGH1:
You thought I was calling you gay because I used the term "gender bias"

LAUGH2:(not certain but probable)
You dont know what anthropomorphism means

LAUGH3:
You read "allude" as "allure", is the Scottish dictionary like a travel version of the English one or are you just stupid?

LAUGH4:
You assume I could gain control of your system through an MP3 file, you are full of fear and ignorance. Perhaps if you pray to your Scottish god then he will fix it. (don't hold your breath)

Just the sex bit I would imagine.