That's a telegram sticker if I am not mistaken, that is, the sticker can be used on telegram, you can send it to your loved ones as gift for whatever occasion that it suits, or just for fun...

Pavel Durov (the CEO of Telegram) sometime last year announced that the chat messenger is coming to an era where anyone will be able to convert and mint their telegram stickers as nfts which they can hold in their wallet or sell in the nft market to other sticker lovers and traders.

Basically though, I have not seen any real world use for this, other than for internet fun and sensation, you can choose to keep it or sell it off, up to you.

I completely agree with you, of course. Negative tagging should and may only happen if the fraud is clearly proven.
In such a case, however, the tag is definitely justified. I would not enter into a trade with someone who openly cheats in such games, as there would also be a high probability of being cheated.

---

As others have already said: The sticker is most likely only applicable in Telegram and can be used there in chats.

One Livestream, one opportunity...

🔥 11 UTC - Eli Russ and Purple Cat

 Join the livestream in:
🔥 Whalesocials 🔥 Twitch 🔥 Kick

Don't miss out!💸

I also agree if someone cheats in such contests then a negative tag is good option to stop such cheaters but I also agree that it's not right to tag someone before it's proven that they have cheated in the contest. Well, still if someone does something like that then at least such a person should get a warning that if they are found with cheating then they will get a negative tag.

If the user is suspected doing that I guess neutral tag must be serve while investigation is ongoing. It maybe remove if the person involve is been cleared for cheating or either the tag will be raised to negative if proven cheating.

But for sure there are ways to know if the user is cheating and people who lead this contest would provably knows it.

That's why its not good for anyone to do this and take advantage on the situation then cheat since they cannot come up clean since for sure that those illegal action they made will immediately busted.

I don't think cheating itself will be much of an issue as long as you only have people with accounts of a certain rank/merit count/... and not newbie accounts. Nobody will cheat with a higher ranked account for a few dollars and destroy it with a negative tag.

But otherwise I agree with you: a tag is of course only justified if fraud is definitely proven. Whale certainly has the means to do this.

I've been meaning to ask this question here, I've been playing on whale casino for several months now, particularly on or through their telegram mini app since I am very active on telegram and find using their mini app more easy and convenient for me, but recently, i decided to login to my account through their web site, I selected telegram login in their login options and successfully logged in, but ever since then, the mini app stopped working for me, each time I try to open the mini app, I get the error message just as shown in the screenshot below



I don't know what happened but does this mean once one uses his or her whale account on the mini app to login on the site, access to the same account on the mini app is automatically denied? Not just access to the account alone but the mini app entirely?
Or does this mean the casino has terminated their telegram mini app?
Will indeed appreciate any useful information or insight on this.

Recently, a new signature campaign dedicated to the Whale casino appeared on a neighboring forum Altcoinstalks. I am very glad that this casino is scaling up its advertising and becoming more recognizable. I wanted to say that similar contests, like those that are regularly held on behalf of the Whale casino here on Bitcointalk, would also be extremely interesting and in demand also there, in Altcoinstalks. I will look forward to being able to participate there too. Good luck, Whale 🐳

Lol, very funny game, City didn't have any desire to win the game, they were just passing the ball around the field with no real threat at Liverpool's goal. As City passed around the field, Liverpool managed the game very well, hence no yellow card, who would have thought about that outcome. I've gone through the contest thread and nobody went for 0 card, lol.