Don't tell me you used Safepal hardware wallet or some other closed source crap like Tangem?
Trezor wallet is much better, with open source code, and it has coin control that can be use with Trezor Suite or with Electrum wallet.
In 2026 I would not use any wallet with coin control.

It is good to see that some of the suggestions have already been implemented.

Since no one complained, that's fine, but the reason for the high AML of my transaction was that the address had many inputs/outputs. AML risk can be reduced by sending coins through many intermediate addresses.

In the case of losing your ID, can you add the deposit address or deposit txid + receiving address? Revealing the ID from the deposit address alone will greatly reduce privacy.

What's the next thing on your list?

Friends, we're happy to announce that we've added USDT (ERC20).

Regarding the recent comments - like we said, AML is just an bullshit and it is not real , and we have personally also checked the coins for AML reports and they were accepted without any issues. And we have also new address sendings and stuff etc . and if you talk about aml, 50-70% of coins are all marked as High risk AML coins , the only valid option is that the exchanges can block any coins they want if they don't have an proper SOF.

As for the tracking with deposit id or address, there are countless transactions in the blockchain and this feature does not reduces your privacy, you are the same person asking to use an no-kyc exchange and then using an regulated exchange (that's irony), if they want privacy, they know how to not use CEXs. and this option is only applicable for the first 24 hours of the exchange , after that it is not impossible, I cannot just like make changes on individual requests and concerns , I need to take the whole user base context and those earlier comments about losing the swap id, gave us this idea to add it.

If you are very careful, you will move your USDT on ERC20 to different wallets, and can use low tier exchanges for it, before using your USDT on ERC20 as funding your destinating account on a Tier 1 centralized exchange. It will takes time and it will also take more transaction fees by moving your USDT around but if you prioritize safety of your fund, it's worth to do some extra transactions.

I also considered that possibility, because most of the popular hardware wallets out there have coin_control feature in their native software. In any case, they're probably compatible with Electrum, which has advanced features like coin_control where you can "freeze" the address/utxo (to avoid accidentally spending from that address). So, if the native software of these wallets doesn't have coin_control, you can simply connect it to Electrum (or Sparrow).

---

Regarding the high AML scores for some, it's something I expect from freekyc services. Most times I've used no-KYC exchanges, I've received UTXOs with scores of 50-60%. There's not much we can do, the way is try your luck or use another service to exchange coins for the same ones with lower AML (like mixer) if you're afraid of them being blocked. We might think AML is all bullshit, but unfortunately, our coins can get blocked on centralized platforms for any reason their AML software indicates. Unfortunately, this is a reality that many cannot ignore. I also think this whole AML issue is bullshit and shouldn't exist.

It's worth remembering that I've received coins with considerably high AML scores of 50-60% from licensed exchanges as well, which makes me think that if you do AML checks on UTXOs received from licensed exchanges, at least some of your UTXOs will show a high AML percentage, and you'll be afraid to spend those UTXOs. So yes, you can receive coins with high AML even from licensed exchanges.

Regarding b1exch.io (or simply black exchange), the name, similar to a well-known similar service in this community, already triggered nostalgia, happiness, and sadness at the same time (remembering that such a service no longer exists due to persecution). I welcome you, I really liked the website's interface and the detailed information at the time of the exchange. I will be happy to test the exchange sometime soon. I'm very happy that several similar services are emerging, after the shutdown of eXch, we were orphaned from this for a long time.

Oh, and congrats on starting your sig campaign! I hope you build your name and a large community on Bitcointalk. Do you also have a thread on altcoinstalks?

I tried accessing two b1ack Exchange website links using different devices:

https://b1exch.io/ via Firefox Focus (smartphone), and
http://blckexcrpdmau6y7teqxmf6yiyg7xn7qlphjeaxgyimxokz623w4tmqd.onion/ via Tor Browser (desktop PC).

Unfortunately, the clearweb link seems to be experiencing an issue (host error) when I tried to access it.



On the other hand, the Tor mirror was accessible after completing two CAPTCHA tasks.

Below are some impressions I had while using b1ack Exchange, along with a few questions and requests that the b1ack Exchange development team might want to consider.

◌ Honestly, I feel that the font size used on the b1ack Exchange website is a bit too small. The layout seems more optimized for smartphones and feels less comfortable on desktop PCs. That said, the overall instructions and menus are still fairly clear.
◌ The number of crypto assets available for swapping is still quite limited. However, for me personally, as a BTC and Monero user, it’s already more than sufficient.
◌ When the coin selection list is open, it would be more intuitive if it automatically minimized when clicking anywhere else on the page, rather than requiring the user to click the menu again to close it.
◌ The fee information is presented clearly and transparently.
◌ The refund address feature is also very helpful. However, when a swap fails and the BTC deposit address and the BTC refund address are different, I initially wondered whether this mechanism would resemble a mixer.
◌ As is well known, Monero addresses are quite long, are there any plans to add a feature that allows users to scan addresses via QR code?

I recently swapped BTC for Monero. The process requires three blockchain confirmations before the swap is processed. My transaction took approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes from the first confirmation to the moment the Monero arrived in my wallet.





Overall, I am satisfied with the outcome. The only drawback is the length of the waiting period, due to the requirement for three Bitcoin confirmations, plus the time needed to send Monero to the wallet.

Just looking for some clarification.

b1exch advertises no logs and no js, but the site seems to be using Cloudflare.

Since CF usually logs basic connection data (IP, timestamps, request info) for security, how does this align with the "no logs" claim? Is it meant as "no internal logs" only?

Also, does the site stay fully usable without js if CF challenges are triggered?

Btw, i really like the very simple black design of the site.

It’s a very simple site I’ll give it that much but, a little something I find a bit unease is how the site keeps opening a new page for every click you do on the platform. That isn’t really nice from the developers and I’m assuming I’m not just the only one experiencing this.

Like, having to click the menu and click on swap, rather than redirecting right back to the home page where you have all that, it opens a new page entirely on your browser.

A refunded coin hasn't tangled with the privacy system, it's just like returning your deposit back to you.