Finally I tested b1exch.to and everything were done smoothly for my first experience with this exchange. It's impressive.
No registration required.
No email.
No KYC.
Nothing, just go to the exchange, and do your trade with BTC to different altcoins and vice versa.
It is possible to use with Tor, that's great.
I choose to swap BTC to XMR, and the fee is 4% ($5.91 in my case) that is quite high in my opinion. I did not test with other altcoins yet, but in some posts above and hopefully they will give cheaper fees.
Most of steps are detected automatic like my deposit, to processing of the exchange.
Rate seems to be update about 8 minutes. I did not notice it when I start the trade but a few time later, I looked and see the countdown timer was already less than 8 minutes.
With my trade, the processing time for BTC to XMR is slow. At starting of the output processing, the timer is 16 minutes.
It is a quite long waiting time with XMR but I found this with b1exch's FAQ.
https://b1exch.to/FaqWhy is my Monero order taking so long?
We use a single wallet for all Monero transactions. Due to protocol limitations requiring 10 confirmations before UTXOs are spendable, multiple Monero orders may cause delays. We use multiple pools to speed this up, but significant amounts may take time.
After all, it was done after about 25 minutes.
Thank you for your review but I want to ask , where else do you get such fees with no kyc and that too for xmr ?
Running an no kyc and having xmr is tough.
If you can get 5 m$ monero for 1 % , please let us know .
We will gladly buy from you.
Even if not 5m$ , atleast 200k$ ?
Let's forget about it.
Can you share us links to other exchanges that offer's same level of privacy and liquidity but lower fees.
Hi
b1ack .. How could this happen? Now I am using Tor, even I haven't closed the transaction yet, while I will censor the list of wallets, if you ask for further evidence such as videos or other data I will send you.
According to this data, isn't this a loss? Please explain how this happened?
This was an UI bug that was fixed immediately.
Please also do mention that you received your whole amount.
Not just half narrative.
Yes, I was mistaken earlier when looking at the SOL Pool section.
I don't think they use a fixed SOL Pool address, and that address will change, there's no point in relying on it to find out about the reserve.
Solana has been added and is currently in beta.
You can swap small amounts while we monitor the trades .
We are fixing alot of stuff in the backend.
If a swap fails , you can always get refunded.
I had another issue with SOL.
I tried doing SOL -> LTC, sent around $200 in SOL.
After the confirmations, it shows "refund required", but there is no input for the refund address and it says "No funds available. [R004]". Basically, the funds are stuck now.
Might be better to disable Solana until everything is fixed.
small amounts will work fine.
We won't just allow big swaps yet.
Wait for us to complete the testing and when everything seems fine , liquidity will be added.
This actually sounds great for Marketing. May I ask however, why become an Affiliate only by application and not make it available to everybody? Is it to avoid people abusing the system by referring themselves?
I think you've answered your own question.
In the swaps niche, abusing affiliate programs is common practice.
If the goal is to prevent abuse, how exactly does requiring an application help filter out abusers? In my view, submitting an application is hardly a barrier for someone who seriously intends to exploit the affiliate program.
On the other hand, it is a barrier for people who don't really care about affiliate payouts in the first place. If every customer automatically had a referral link or code, even someone who might earn just a couple of cents in their lifetime could end up using it. Those few cents obviously make no real difference to them, but the service would still have to spend time and resources processing a huge number of tiny, essentially meaningless payouts.
So IMO this is probably less about preventing abuse and more about reducing administrative overhead.
The applications are just an part of the hurdles.
We will instantly findout if someone is abusing the system. We cannot share much details but we will know if you are abusing.
I get the picture now. Anyway in 15 more days , we will be able to transfer the domain and get .io back.
Im not really sure how that could be possible but from what you said it gives a bit of hope. Still, normally you should try to stay careful because many scammers may demand a large amount of money just to take advantage of the situation. So be careful.
Anyway, you mentioned that within another 15 days the domain can be transferred to (.io). How were you able to be so sure about this? It would be helpful if you could share a little more detail about it.
Please read our old comments.
Not just some part of it.
We spoke with njalla and they will let us transfer the domains and new domains have an lock for 60 days.
So we are waiting for that period.
b1ack don't be too small to store Liquidy SOL, what is it written that it is available for just a few seconds it will run out. Some questions from other users about Liquidity SOL you did not answer above.
I see that for a few days now, SOL is available. but don't have adequate Liquidity, I said before that your Liquidity in USDT (ERC20) is very much why not replenish it to SOL and USDT (TRC20) to balance the Liquidity of USDT (ERC20).
The comparison is like heaven and earth, too far away.
We just don't see much volume in USDT-TRC 20 yet.
If a swap is placed.
Our backup reserves will kick in.
This is done to safeguard us from having heavy liquidity and in case there any attacks , there should be minimum financial loss.
We are not eXch.
We don't have the luxury of crypto boom.
