Yeah, that's a really strange comparison. Using an exchange service as a mixer by swapping one way and then back again could lead to a situation where you first exchange Bitcoin for Monero, pay a 1% fee, then swap Monero back to Bitcoin, pay another 1% fee, and end up receiving the exact same Bitcoins you originally sent. After all, the whole point of an exchange isn't to get the same cryptocurrency back.

You really surprised everybody by reducing the swap fee. When I saw your post about the new fee, I compared it with some mixer platforms and exchanges around and honestly, b1exch platform has created one of the cheapest ways to swap now. I’m also a regular user of b1exch exchange, seeing the (XMR) fee reduced to just (1%) really made me happy.
It has given me a better chance to do more swaps here anytime. From my personal side, this low fee opportunity really helps me exchange with less stress and better value.

B1exch is a swap platform and it's not a mixer because it doesn't allow BTC to BTC swapping and that's what mixers do. I believe such low fees are blessings for the ones who want to use no KYC exchanges like B1exch because they can now exchange huge amounts without any fear of KYC details and for very low fees. Thanks B1exch for such low fees, I believe in future we might have even lower fees than 1% as B1exch grows.

The exchange already had quite competitive fees for the service its offering, it's a KYC-free exchange, people could be expected to pay more for their privacy. Although I haven't used and probably won't use any of the XMR trading pairs, it's extremely positive to see a further reduction in the already low fees. Congratulations to the b1exch team, I was really surprised from this move!

If you have to go through a centralised exchange again, then it's hard to protect your privacy for the transaction. As you preferred a non-KYC exchange, it'd be hard to find a reputable one. Because we have been seeing how exchanges implement their KYC policy, and anytime they could ask for documents. They might stand with some accused, like suspicious transactions, etc.

Probably you can't get both, like protect privacy and save swap fees. Because traders often use instant exchange to avoid hassle, but of course the swap or instant exchange should be trusted, like b1exch already gained trust. If you're really concerned about the privacy, then you shouldn't think much about the swap fees. But also b1exch should think about minimising the swap fees as well.

I think b1exch should reconsider the swap fees to encourage more users on their platform. Unless users satisfied with the swap fees then swapping would be lower.

It's been a while since I've last traded on the exchange but if I'm not mistaken smaller amounts, below $50 for instance had higher fees. Has this changed into a flat rate? If so, then it's understandable to be frustrated for a $3 fee on a <$30 order (that's almost 10%).

I also tried exchanging right now, Bitcoin to Litecoin, mistakenly I forgot to input the amount in BTC and it automatically submitted 1 Bitcoin for trading, when I cancelled the order and returned to the main page, the initial trading pairs had switched to XMR to BTC(not exactly sure?) and no matter how many times I tried, it wouldn't change till the website displayed an error. Refreshing also didn't work and had to return to the main page.

I most definitely used a destination address, it has been saved on Google Chrome's cache/auto-complete, and it's the only LTC address I use. Anyway, I use the clearnet link in most cases unless there's an ongoing issue and have to access through Tor, it's not a significant issue that disrupts the exchange's functionality, although, I'm glad to hear that you're working on a fix and it'll be resolved soon enough.

It's very good to witness this from the beginning (when they first appeared on the forum). We're practically beta testers, but it's wonderful to see these platforms mature and each follow its own path, offering differential according to its one's philosophy.

In the case of b1eXch, offering low fees without outsourcing its liquidity, if I'm not mistaken, the platform you mentioned handles its own liquidity in the most important/sought-after pairs or something like that, but both services are very good.

As you can see above, it seems we'll soon have another reduction in fees.

If a coin's pair reserve drops and there'snt enough reserve trade to refill them, the fee that is applied, what actually will it do?
Will the fee get liquidity from another coin with good reserve and convert it to the intended coins to be swapped?
I mean it isn't the users fault that reserves are low for some certain coins.
I acknowledge the fact that you guys will work on it but I do not think that the explanation really added up here.

I posted this before, but your reply seems to be making sense to my question above.