@b1ack I just read an article online from the MEX that you can read it here - https://www.mexc.com/news/1053686

THORChain is being flagged as a key route for hackers to move stolen funds, hacker from the kelpdao now move their money into thorchain and like my previous case with bybit I do believe this gonna have further action. So is b1exch gonna affected by this? If so, do you have plant to move the liqudity from Thorchain to your own smart contract address?

About THORChain:

Yeah, THORChain is easy - we could just stream swaps through them. But there are problems:

Privacy issues: • THORChain transactions are completely transparent • Everything can be tracked - amounts, addresses, everything • Destroys anonymity • We're a privacy exchange - routing through transparent DEX makes no sense
Performance problems: • Big swaps take forever on THORChain • Slippage is brutal on larger amounts • Lots of incomplete swaps (users send funds, get partial amounts back) • Random refunds • Unpredictable
We don't control it: • Once swap is on THORChain, we can't fix issues • At their mercy
Development uncertainty: • THORChain devs handing off to new team • Red flag • Uncertain future
So we moved to own liquidity only.

Current pools:
Under 20kreserves:Max20kreserves:Max50k per pool Above 20kreserves:Max20kreserves:Max100k per pool
We'll add more based on demand. No point pouring massive liquidity everywhere when it's not needed.
This update is new - monitoring for bugs. Growing carefully.
THORChain was for launch. Own liquidity is the real plan.

Also working on:
Enhanced privacy features for 100% anonymity. No other swap has done this.
Details coming. v

A month ago, the official position on Thorchain was explained. I believe it has been implemented so far.
Obviously, b1exch was aware of all the pros & cons of using Thorchain

Perhaps this has already been discussed, but if I remember correctly, at the beginning the balance b1exch was much larger than what it shows on the website now. I'm not sure what's at stake, but it's possible that everything was transferred to its own liquidity.

We'll add more based on demand. No point pouring massive liquidity everywhere when it's not needed.

Don't use THORChain if coins get marked as high AML. If funds are locked in exchanges because of THORChain connections it will make users disappointed with the service website. Users will have confidence if they avoid third party liquidity including THORChain because of being flagged.

Recently, eXch was targeted, today it is Thorchain, tomorrow someone else. Free trade options are being severely curtailed.
One more thing is noticeable, it is no longer enough just to come to an exchange and do a swap. More analysis is needed, such as feedback, real reviews, whether it uses its own liquidity funds, whether it uses Thorchain, and whether there are sanctions on addresses. It seems to me that it is too complicated for ordinary trade, especially for beginners

That’s exactly what I was about to tell you.

Someone who values privacy and therefore chooses exchanges like b1eXch for trading cryptocurrencies generally doesn’t use Google services either. Also, the target audience of people who want to use services like b1eXch and have to Google for them in the first place is probably negligible. The average exchange user is more than satisfied with Binance and the like and doesn’t even consider that there might be privacy concerns here.

In short: If Google decides to block it, the damage caused will likely be very minimal.

So if using an exchange is too stressful with a lot of tasks for checking, and a lot of risk factors, who will use exchange?

I believe that majority of user don't care much about KYC issues, all they want is a useful service whether that's controlled by a centralized system or that works as no KYC services that doesn't need customers data to work. If there job gets done at any of those they become happy.

This will change the entire industry.

It's a certainty that the cost of specialized advertising per click will skyrocket by 3-5 times. Large exchanges will lose significant revenue but will survive because they have a brand and a loyal audience. But medium and small exchanges will suffer significant traffic losses and it will become even more difficult for new exchanges to build a reputation.