Steph Curry is on a roll, he is doing a wonderful job but that is also showing the weakness of Spurs at the same time. While Wemby is great, they do not have a good enough perimeter defense and any team with a good three point shooter could defeat them.
While Step is not just "any good shooter" he is literally the guy with the most three points made, that still doesn't change the fact that if you have a good three point shooter, you will cause trouble for Spurs. If they want to win a title with Wemby somehow, then they need to focus on making perimeter better. This is also their first ever year without Gregg Pop, which will be hard, even though he is around, he is not the head coach anymore, which means there will be some time to adjust.
Chef scored 46 points, and if he's close to 50, I don't think they'll lose that game. Yes, Wembley is changing the game right now and is very high-quality, but when Curry and his team start playing in these kinds of games, there's not much the opposition can do. While the Spurs have been playing brilliantly this season, they can't win every game; of course, they'll lose some. At least they lost against GSW, so that's not a big deal

With the West being so fierce, I can't predict where these teams will end up, both for San Antonio and GSW. GSW needs at least one, maybe two, very good role players. If this team makes the necessary additions, Curry will still have a two-year window for a championship. No matter which team they play in the playoffs, Curry will be the best player on the court. By best, I mean someone who can take control of the game and change its course. For example, it's perfectly possible and understandable to see Giannis as more valuable due to his two-way contributions, but if the Bucks and Warriors are playing Game 7, even if it's the Bucks as a team, the game is still up for grabs because of Curry. They proved this against Spurs imo. It was hell of a game.